Sustainability in Building and Construction: LCA of 21 Mural Paints

Abstract:

Sustainability and environmental impact assessment are essential to orient new generation of materials for building and construction. In this study, life cycle assessment was applied to a set of 21 mural paints produced by a paint factory in Italy. Data collection covered upstream processes (i.e., raw materials extraction and supply), the core process (i.e., paint manufacture and packaging) and downstream processes (i.e., transport to retailers). Material and energy inputs and outputs for the main components employed in paint manufacturing (e.g., antifoaming agents, dispersants, coalescing agents, additives, biocides and similar) were gathered from primary and secondary data sources. Life cycle impact assessment results were estimated for global warming potential (on average, 1.03 ± 0.60 kg CO₂/kg paint), photochemical oxidation (0.60 ± 0.46 g C₂H₄/kg paint), abiotic depletion (1.94 ± 1.58 g Sb/kg paint), acidification (6.80 ± 6.64 g SO₂/kg paint), and eutrophication (1.96 ± 1.47 g PO₄/kg paint). Overall, upstream processes are responsible for the greatest environmental impact (on average, more than 70% for global warming potential), with titanium rutile from sulfates being the most impacting raw material. The results informed decision makers and provided a basis for achieving improvement and greener production strategies in paint manufacturing.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 919)
• Pages: 227-235
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-yd1rz1
• Online since: May 2022
• Authors: Luca Ciacci*, Ivano Vassura, Fabrizio Catalano, Alice Simoncelli, Fabrizio Moretti, Fabrizio Passarini
• Keywords: Carbon Footprint, Environmental Sustainability, EPD, Life Cycle Assessment, Titanium Dioxide

References

[1] United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, 2021. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (Accessed on June 2021).

[2] UNEP – United Nations Environment Programme, 2020 Global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Nairobi, (2020).

[3] ISO – International Standard Organisation, ISO 14040:2006 – Environmental management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and framework. International Standard Organisation, Switzerland, (2006).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2005.03.001

[4] A. Paiano, T. Gallucci, A. Pontrandolfo, G. Lagioia, P. Piccinno, A. Lacalamita, Sustainable options for paints through a life cycle assessment method, Journal of Cleaner Production 295 (2020) 126464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126464

[5] E. Shittu, V. Stojceska, P. Gratton, M. Kolokotroni, Environmental impact of cool roof paint: case-study of house retrofit in two hot islands, Energy & Buildings 217 (2020) 110007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110007

[6] I. Merta, A. Mladenovič, J. Turk, A. Šajna, A. Mauko Pranjić, Life cycle assessment of natural fibre reinforced cementitious composites, Key Engineering Materials 761 (2018) 204–209.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.761.204

[7] S.P. Wang, W.J. Chen, Z.H. Wang, X.Z. Gong, C.Z. Zhao, L.P. Ma, life cycle assessment of PVC-U plastic window production, Key Engineering Materials 599 (2014) 319–323.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.599.319

[8] C.W. Scheuer, G.A. Keoleian, P. Reppe, Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications. Energy and Buildings 35 (2003) 1049-1064.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7788(03)00066-5

[9] Hischier, R., Nowack, B., Gottschalk, F. et al. Life cycle assessment of façade coating systems containing manufactured nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 17, 68 (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-2881-0

[10] Bonoli, A., Franzoni, E. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis of renders and paints for the restoration of historical buildings. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 296, 012022 (2019).

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012022

[11] Paiano, A., Gallucci, T., Pontrandolfo, A., Lagioia, G., Piccinno, P., Lacalamita, A., Sustainable options for paints through a life cycle assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126464 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126464

[12] Van Stijn, A., Malabi Eberhardt, L.C., Wouterszoon Jansen, B., Meijer, A. A Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment (CE-LCA) model for building components. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, 105683 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105683

[13] Cerved-Databank. Pitture e vernici per l'edilizia – Produzione Italia.

[14] ISO – International Standard Organisation. ISO 14044:2006/A1:2018 – Environmental management, Life cycle assessment, Requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organisation, Switzerland, (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30290345

[15] International EPD System, Product Category Rules (PCR) – Construction products and construction services, (2019).

[16] EPDLA – European Polymer Dispersion & Latex Association, Life cycle inventory of polymer dispersions, Personal communication, (2019).

[17] Dorfner, Life cycle analysis data for kaolin/clay products, Personal communication, (2019).

[18] G. Wernet, C. Bauer, B. Steubing, J. Reinhard, E. Moreno-Ruiz, B. Weidema, The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21 (2016) 1218–1230.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

[19] ANFIA – Associazione Nazionale Filiera Industria Automobilistica, Dossier trasporto merci su strada in Unione Europea e in Italia, pp.1-57, 2019. Available at: https://www.anfia.it/it/pubblicazioni-dossier (Accessed on June 2021). [in Italian].

[20] Mapei SpA, Dichiarazione ambientale di prodotto – Colorite Matt, Dursilite, Dusrsilite Matt, Dursilite Plus, Dursilite Gloss, The International EPD System, (2017).

[21] San Marco Group SpA, Dichiarazione ambientale di prodotto – Sistema Marcotherm Acrisyl, The International EPD System, (2019).