Benefits and Opportunities of Reusing Waste Rotor Blades Materials from a Life Cycle Perspective

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) intends to investigate the environmental benefit of using natural fibres and/or recyclable epoxy resins for future manufacturing of small/medium wind turbine blades to handle thermoset polymer composites that are designed to be recyclable at the end of life”). LCA comparison of a modelled blade based on flax fibres reinforced recyclable epoxy resin and a traditional blade made of glass fibres and non recyclable epoxy resin is presented. In the production phase the environmental impacts of the flax fibre reinforced recyclable epoxy resin composite blade are higher than the blade based on glass fibre epoxy composite mainly due to the higher amount of epoxy resin necessary to satisfy the design criteria of the blade e.g. fatigue and deflection. The end of life is significative as the environmental impacts are reduced by the recycling and recovery of the fibres and the resin, being the resin more significative.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

270-277

Citation:

Online since:

May 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Schmidl, S. Hinrichs, Geocycle Provides Sustainable Recycling of Rotor Blades in Cement Plant, DEWI MAGAZIN NO. 36, February 2010, 6-14.

Google Scholar

[2] S.J. Pickering, Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials—current status, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Volume 37, Issue 8, (2006) 1206-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030

Google Scholar

[3] A. D. La Rosa, S. Greco, C. Tosto, G. Cicala. LCA and LCC of a chemical recycling process of waste CF-thermoset composites for the production of novel CF-thermoplastic composites. Open loop and closed loop scenarios, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 304, (2021), 127158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127158

Google Scholar

[4] P. Asokan, M. Osmani, A.D.F. Price, Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites, Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (2009) 821–829A.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.004

Google Scholar

[5] A. Yazdanbakhsh and L.C. Bank, A Critical Review of Research on Reuse of Mechanically Recycled FRP Production and End-of-Life Waste for Construction, Polymers 6 (2014) 1810-1826;.

DOI: 10.3390/polym6061810

Google Scholar

[6] C. Brazão Farinha, J. de Brito, R. Veiga, Assessment of glass fibre reinforced polymer waste reuse as filler in mortars, Journal of Cleaner Production, 210 (2019) 1579-1594. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.080.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.080

Google Scholar

[7] A.J. Nagle, E.L. Delaney, L.C. Bank, P.G. Leahy, A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment between landfilling and Co-Processing of waste from decommissioned Irish wind turbine blades, Journal of Cleaner Production, 277 (2020) 123321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123321.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123321

Google Scholar

[8] AD La Rosa, LCA of biopolymers in: Biopolymers and Biotech Admixtures for Eco-efficient Construction Materials, Woodhead Publishing Series, 12, 2016, Pages 57-78.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100214-8.00004-x

Google Scholar

[9] ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006a. 14040 – Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.

Google Scholar

[10] ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006b. 14044- Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines.

Google Scholar

[11] A. D. La Rosa, I.Blanco, D. R. Banatao, S. J. Pastine, A. Björklund, G. Cicala. Innovative Chemical Process for Recycling Thermosets Cured with Recyclamines® by Converting BioEpoxy Composites in Reusable Thermoplastic—An LCA Study. Materials, 11 (2018) 353.

DOI: 10.3390/ma11030353

Google Scholar

[12] L.P. Mikkelsen, A simplified model predicting the weight of the load carrying beam in a wind turbine blade, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 139 (2016) 012038.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/139/1/012038

Google Scholar

[13] J.P. Blasques, M. Stolpe, Multi-material topology optimization of laminated composite beam cross sections, Compos. Struct. 94 (2012) 3278-3289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.002

Google Scholar

[14] F. Bensadoun, K.A.M. Vallons, L.B. Lessard, I. Verpoest, A.W. Van Vuure, Fatigue behaviour assessment of flax–epoxy composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 82 (2016) 252-266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.003

Google Scholar

[15] J.M. Rinker, M.H. Hansen, T.J. Larsen, Calibrating a wind turbine model using diverse datasets, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1037 (2018) 062026.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/6/062026

Google Scholar