Energy Improvement in the Building Sector: An Economic Analysis Relating to the most Common Italian Masonry

Abstract:

The construction sector is a major contributor to total energy consumption, therefore, it is crucial to adopt energy efficiency strategies capable of reducing energy impact in buildings. Among these strategies, exterior wall insulation is one of the most cost-effective options to achieve energy savings for both newly constructed and renovated buildings. In this paper, based on an economic analysis, we aim to determine the economically optimal thickness of insulation material to be used for retrofit interventions of masonry structures. The study analyzes 10 different insulating materials and 5 masonry structures widespread in Italy. The results show that each masonry structure requires a careful evaluation of the thickness of the insulating material to be applied in retrofit operations. Moreover, varying the type of insulating material used, even if applied to the same wall structure, there are different levels of thickness to be applied in order to optimize the performance of the structure.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 919)
• Pages: 236-247
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-52403f
• Online since: May 2022
• Authors: Valeria Annibaldi, Federica Cucchiella, Idiano D'Adamo, Massimo Gastaldi, Marianna Rotilio*
• Keywords: Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Optimum Insulation Thickness, Retrofit, Thermal Insulation

References

[1] M. Sovetova, S.A. Memon, J. Kim, Thermal performance and energy efficiency of building integrated with PCMs in hot desert climate region, Sol. Energy. 189 (2019) 357–371.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.067

[2] A. Credo, A. Cristofari, S. Lucidi, F. Rinaldi, F. Romito, M. Santececca, M. Villani, Design Optimization of Synchronous Reluctance Motor for Low Torque Ripple BT - A View of Operations Research Applications in Italy, 2018, in: M. Dell'Amico, M. Gaudioso, G. Stecca (Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019: p.53–69.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25842-9_5

[3] W. Zhu, Z. Zhang, X. Li, W. Feng, J. Li, Assessing the effects of technological progress on energy efficiency in the construction industry: A case of China, J. Clean. Prod. 238 (2019) 117908.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117908

[4] B.-E. Benzar, M. Park, H.-S. Lee, I. Yoon, J. Cho, Determining retrofit technologies for building energy performance, J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 19 (2020) 367–383.

DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2020.1748037

[5] R.D. Muddu, D.M. Gowda, A.J. Robinson, A. Byrne, Optimisation of retrofit wall insulation: An Irish case study, Energy Build. 235 (2021) 110720.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110720

[6] M. Kameni Nematchoua, P. Ricciardi, S. Reiter, A. Yvon, A comparative study on optimum insulation thickness of walls and energy savings in equatorial and tropical climate, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6 (2017) 170–182.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.001

[7] D. D'Agostino, F. de' Rossi, M. Marigliano, C. Marino, F. Minichiello, Evaluation of the optimal thermal insulation thickness for an office building in different climates by means of the basic and modified cost-optimal, methodology, J. Build. Eng. 24 (2019) 100743.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100743

[8] A. Bolattürk, Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Appl. Therm. Eng. 26 (2006) 1301–1309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.10.019

[9] V. Annibaldi, F. Cucchiella, M. Rotilio, A Sustainable Solution for Energy Efficiency in Italian Climatic Contexts, Energies. 13 (2020) 2817.

DOI: 10.3390/en13112817

[10] M.F. Alsayed, R.A. Tayeh, Life cycle cost analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness in Palestinian buildings, J. Build. Eng. 22 (2019) 101–112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.018

[11] V. Annibaldi, F. Cucchiella, P. De Berardinis, M. Rotilio, V. Stornelli, Environmental and economic benefits of optimal insulation thickness: A life-cycle cost analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 116 (2019) 109441.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109441

[12] N. Sisman, E. Kahya, N. Aras, H. Aras, Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey's different degree-day regions, Energy Policy. 35 (2007) 5151–5155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.037

[13] J. Yu, C. Yang, L. Tian, D. Liao, A study on optimum insulation thicknesses of external walls in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Appl. Energy. 86 (2009) 2520–2529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.010

[14] Ö.A. Dombaycı, The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings, Build. Environ. 42 (2007) 3855–3859.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.054

[15] K. Çomaklı, B. Yüksel, Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in buildings, Appl. Therm. Eng. 24 (2004) 933–940.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.020

[16] T.M.I. Mahlia, A. Iqbal, Cost benefits analysis and emission reductions of optimum thickness and air gaps for selected insulation materials for building walls in Maldives, Energy. 35 (2010) 2242–2250.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.011

[17] ISO 15686-5:2017, Buildings and constructed assets-Service-life planning. 5. Life-cycle costing, (2017).

DOI: 10.3403/30184346

[18] UNI/TR 11552:2014, Opaque envelope components of buildings, (2014).

[19] UNI 10351:2015, Materiali e prodotti per edilizia - Proprietà termoigrometriche - Procedura per la scelta dei valori di progetto, (2015).

[20] ARERA, Prices, (2021). https://www.arera.it/it/index.htm.

[21] A. Kylili, P.A. Fokaides, Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review, Sustain. Cities Soc. 35 (2017) 280–288.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013

[22] R. Idchabani, A. Khyad, M. El Ganaoui, Optimizing insulation thickness of external walls in cold region of Morocco based on life cycle cost analysis, Energy Procedia. 139 (2017) 117–121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.183

[23] J. Yu, L. Tian, C. Yang, X. Xu, J. Wang, Optimum insulation thickness of residential roof with respect to solar-air degree-hours in hot summer and cold winter zone of china, Energy Build. 43 (2011) 2304–2313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.012

[24] O. Kaynakli, A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012) 415–425.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.006

[25] A. Appolloni, C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour, I. D'Adamo, M. Gastaldi, D. Settembre-Blundo, Green recovery in the mature manufacturing industry: The role of the green-circular premium and sustainability certification in innovative efforts, Ecol. Econ. 193 (2022) 107311.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107311

[26] F. Ascione, N. Bianco, G. Maria Mauro, D.F. Napolitano, Building envelope design: Multi-objective optimization to minimize energy consumption, global cost and thermal discomfort. Application to different Italian climatic zones, Energy. 174 (2019) 359–374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.182

[27] F.F. Cyrille Vincelas, T. Ghislain, The determination of the most economical combination between external wall and the optimum insulation material in Cameroonian's buildings, J. Build. Eng. 9 (2017) 155–163.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.12.008

[28] A. Appolloni, I. D'Adamo, M. Gastaldi, E.D.R. Santibanez-Gonzalez, D. Settembre-Blundo, Growing e-waste management risk awareness points towards new recycling scenarios: The view of the Big Four's youngest consultants, Environ. Technol. Innov. 23 (2021) 101716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101716

[29] M.S. Medina-Salgado, F.E. García-Muiña, M. Cucchi, D. Settembre-Blundo, Adaptive Life Cycle Costing (LCC) Modeling and Applying to Italy Ceramic Tile Manufacturing Sector: Its Implication of Open Innovation, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 7 (2021) 101.

DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7010101

[30] A.M. Ferrari, L. Volpi, D. Settembre-Blundo, F.E. García-Muiña, Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) integrating life cycle inventory (LCI) and Enterprise resource planning (ERP) in an industry 4.0 environment, J. Clean. Prod. 286 (2021) 125314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125314

[31] S. Alonso-Muñoz, R. González-Sánchez, C. Siligardi, F.E. García-Muiña, Building Exploitation Routines in the Circular Supply Chain to Obtain Radical Innovations, Resources. 10 (2021) 22.

DOI: 10.3390/resources10030022