Impact of CNC Milling Parameters on Temperature, Surface Roughness, and Chip Formation of General Purpose PMMA

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study evaluates the impacts of machining parameters on the milling of general-purpose poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with respect to cutting point temperature, maximum machining temperature, and surface roughness. The machining parameters used in the analysis are spindle speed (rpm), depth of cut (mm), and feed rate (mm/min). The extreme ranges of the machining parameters for the material are obtained from trial experiments. From these experiments, four values of each parameter are adopted. This yields 12 experiments, which are divided into three sets. In the first set of experiments, the depth of cut and feed rate are held constant at 0.2 mm and 25 mm/min, while the spindle speed is varied from 1000 rpm to 4000 rpm. In the second set of experiments, the spindle speed and feed rate are held constant at 1000 rpm and 25 mm/min, respectively, while the depth of cut is varied from 0.2 mm to 1.1 mm. In the last set of experiments, the spindle speed and depth of cut are held constant at 1000 rpm and 0.2 mm, respectively, as the feed rate is varied from 25 mm/min to 100 mm/min. Thermal images are obtained during milling, where the cutting point and maximum machining temperatures are obtained. The milled surfaces are then investigated for surface roughness. The chips are also collected from each experiment and used in conducting chip morphology. From the results, it is observed that to obtain the least temperatures and best surface quality, the least machining parameters should be chosen. These parameters are identified as 1000 rpm, 0.2 mm, and 25 mm/min for the spindle speed, depth of cut, and feed rate, respectively. An increase in spindle speed seems to increase the milling temperatures and surface roughness, which is attributed to the reducing chip thickness. An increase in the depth of cut does not affect the generation of chips, and the thickness is relatively constant. However, an increase in milling feed increases the chip thickness, which increases the surface roughness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

49-59

Citation:

Online since:

June 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I. D. Ibrahim, R. Sadiku, T. Jamiru, and W. K. Kupolati, Applications of Polymers in the Biomedical Field, Curr Trends Biomedical Eng & Biosci. 4 (2017) 4–7.

Google Scholar

[2] M. F. Maitz, Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine, Biosurface and Biotribology. 1 (2015) 161–176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.002

Google Scholar

[3] V. Srivastava and R. Srivastava, Advances in Automotive Polymer Applications and Recycling, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2 (2014) 744-746.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Patil, A. Patel, and R. Purohit, An overview of Polymeric Materials for Automotive Applications, Mater. Today Proc. 4 (2017) 3807–3815.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.278

Google Scholar

[5] K. Abhishek, S. Datta, and S. S. Mahapatra, Optimization of MRR, Surface Roughness, and Maximum Tool-Tip Temperature during Machining of CFRP Composites, Mater. Today Proc. 4 (2017) 2761–2770.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.154

Google Scholar

[6] A. H. Elsheikh, W. Deng, and E. A. Showaib, Improving laser cutting quality of polymethylmethacrylate sheet: Experimental investigation and optimization, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 (2019) 1326-1339.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.059

Google Scholar

[7] D. M. D'Addona, S. Genna, C. Leone, and D. Matarazzo, Prediction of Poly-methyl-methacrylate Laser Milling Process Characteristics Based on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Data, Procedia CIRP. 41 (2016) 981–986.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.029

Google Scholar

[8] P. N. Immanuel, C. C. Chiang, C. R. Yang, M. Subramani, T. H. Lee, and S. J. Huang, Surface activation of poly(methyl methacrylate) for microfluidic device bonding through a H2O plasma treatment linked with a low-temperature annealing, J. Micromechanics Microengineering. 31(2021).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6439/abf034

Google Scholar

[9] N. Khatri, V. Mishra, and R. Gopal V Sarepaka, Optimization of Process Parameters to Achieve Nano Level Surface Quality on Polycarbonate, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 48 (2012) 39–44.

DOI: 10.5120/7412-0507

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Yan, Y. Mao, B. Li, and P. Zhou, Machinability of the Thermoplastic Polymers: PEEK, PI, and PMMA, Polymers (MDPI). 13 (2021) 1–14.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13010069

Google Scholar

[11] H. Wang, J. Sun, D. Zhang, K. Guo, and J. Li, The effect of cutting temperature in milling of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 91 (2016) 380–387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.025

Google Scholar

[12] D. Adeniji, J. Schoop, S. Gunawardena, C. Hanson, and M. Jahan, Characterization and Modeling of Surface Roughness and Burr Formation in Slot Milling of Polycarbonate, J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 4 (2020) 1–22.

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp4020059

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Yan, P. Zhou, H. Wang, and Y. Mao, Thermal Effect on Poly (methyl methacrylate) ( PMMA ) Material Removal in the Micromilling Process, Polymers (Basel). 12 (2020) 1–13.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12092122

Google Scholar

[14] J. Zhang, Z. Liu, H. Liu, X. Xu, J. Outeiro, and W. Zhao, Fragmented chip formation mechanism in high-speed cutting from the perspective of stress wave effect, CIRP Ann. 70 (2021) 53–56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.03.016

Google Scholar

[15] M. Suhail, A. Deepak, and S. Nikam, Study of Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Turning of Bronze Filled Polytetrafluoroethylene, Int. J. Adv. Mech. Eng. 4 (2014) 151–160.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Izamshah, M. A. Azam, M. Hadzley, M. A. Md Ali, M. S. Kasim, and M. S. Abdul Aziz, Study of surface roughness on milling unfilled-polyetheretherketones engineering plastics, Procedia Eng. 68 (2013) 654–660.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.235

Google Scholar