Experimental Investigation of Factors Influencing the Determination of the Onset of Yielding by Temperature Measurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

The cooling of the material during elastic tensile loading is well known as the thermoelastic effect. It is already known that the temperature minimum at the elastic-plastic transition can be used for the determination of the onset of yielding. Conceivable parameters for this have already been presented and investigated. Within this study factors influencing the specimen temperature during tensile loading and unloading are experimentally analyzed to improve the determination approach and the understanding of it. Furthermore, the robustness and repeatability of the measurement and evaluation procedures are analyzed. Therefore, cyclic tensile tests with the mild steel DC06 and the high strength steel CR590Y980T (DP1000) are performed with four PT1000 sensors applied on the specimen. The temperature behavior during elastic loading, elastic-plastic elongation and elastic unloading is separately evaluated. Different strain rates are investigated to better understand the strain-dependent heat development and its influence on the temperature-dependent evaluation. In this way, correlations between strain rate and thermal conduction due to prevailing temperature differences are found and their influence on the temperature-based determination of the onset of yielding is analyzed. Therefore, the yield stress at temperature minimum YSTmin as well as an additional yield stress at zero plastic strain YS0 are evaluated for all experiment settings. In a comprehensive experimental study, the standard deviations are compared and thus conclusions can be drawn about the robustness of the determination methods.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Roll, T. Lemke, K. Wiegand, American Institute of Physics (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] C.E. Bottani, G. Caglioti, Materials Letters 1 (1982) 119–121.

Google Scholar

[3] J.M. Dulieu-Barton, Strain 35 (1999) 35–39.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Sallat, Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Fliessverhalten von Blechen im Zweiachsigen. Dissertation, Chemnitz, (1988).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Weber, Ann. Phys. Chem. 96 (1830) 177–213.

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Joule, W. Thomson, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4 (1852) 481–492.

DOI: 10.1080/14786445208647169

Google Scholar

[7] W. Thomson, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 20 (1853) 261–288.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Doege, B.-A. Behrens, Handbuch Umformtechnik: Grundlagen, Technologien, Maschinen, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, s.l., (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04249-2

Google Scholar

[9] K.T. Compton, D.B. Webster., Phys. Rev. 5 (1915) 159–166.

Google Scholar

[10] A.K. Wong, G.C. Kirby, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 37 (1990) 493–504.

Google Scholar

[11] K.N. Pandey, S. Chand, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 80 (2003) 673–687.

Google Scholar

[12] W.N. Sharpe, Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics, Springer, New York, (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] H.-T. Lee, J.-C. Chen, J Mater Sci 26 (1991) 5685–5692.

Google Scholar

[14] M.H. Belgen, ISA Trans 6 (1967) 49–53.

Google Scholar

[15] Z. Chen, U. Gandhi, J. Lee, R.H. Wagoner, J. Mat. Proc. Techn. 227 (2016) 227–243.

Google Scholar

[16] D. Jocham, S. Vitzthum, T. Susumu, W. Annika, V. Wolfram, 9th Forming Technology Forum (2016).

Google Scholar

[17] W. Oliferuk, M. Maj, R. Litwinko, L. Urbański, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 35 (2012) 111–118.

Google Scholar

[18] R.V. Prakash, T. Pravin, T. Kathirvel, K. Balasubramaniam, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 56 (2011) 1–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.09.001

Google Scholar

[19] C. Chandraprakash, C.V. Krishnamurthy, K. Balasubramaniam, Trans Indian Inst Met 72 (2019) 2905–2915.

DOI: 10.1007/s12666-019-01656-6

Google Scholar

[20] I. Jandrlić, S. Rešković, F. Vodopivec, P. Lava, Met. Mater. Int. 22 (2016) 407–412.

DOI: 10.1007/s12540-016-5467-1

Google Scholar

[21] S. Vitzthum, C. Hartmann, M. Eder, W. Volk, Procedia Manufacturing 29 (2019) 490–497.

Google Scholar

[22] Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Metallic materials - Calibration of extensometer systems used in uniaxial testing: German version EN ISO 9513:2012, (2013).

Google Scholar

[23] Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Prüfung metallischer Werkstoffe - Zugproben, 50125th ed., Berlin, Beuth Verlag GmbH, (2009).

Google Scholar

[24] kloeckner metals, DP Steel: Why is Dual Phase Steel Important to Autos? www.kloecknermetals.com/blog/dp-steel-why-is-dual-phase-steel-important-to-autos/.

DOI: 10.1520/a1088-13r19

Google Scholar

[25] W. Volk, P. Hora, Int J Mater Form 4 (2011) 339–346.

Google Scholar