Surface Roughness Prediction of AISI 304 Steel in Nanofluid Assisted Turning Using Machine Learning Technique

Abstract:

Machining is a complex process which uses cutting tool for finshing the workpiece material. A sequence of machining tests costs a lot of expense and effort to complete. It's critical to avoid time-consuming runs and put technology first. Surface roughness (Ra) has been used to signal quality of product in the turning process as part of an automated monitoring system deployed in-process. This research uses machine learning models to estimate surface roughness while machining AISI 304 stainless steel rods. The key elements impacting surface quality are the input variables of turning, namely feed rate, depth of cut, and spindle speed. Four machine learning (ML)-based algorithms were used to predict surface roughness in this study: Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), Decision Tree Regression (DTR), Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGB), and Random Forest (RF) of Surface Roughness (Ra). The baseline models' predictive ability was measured using error measures such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), and coefficient of determination (R²). Overall, the XGB and GBR models appear to have the most accuracy in predicting surface roughness (Ra).

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 933)
• Pages: 13-24
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-wwb643
• Online since: October 2022
• Authors: Prashant Kumar Prasad, Vineet Dubey*, Anuj Kumar Sharma
• Keywords: Machine Learning, Predictive Modeling, Steel, Surface Roughness, Turning

References

[1] R. L. Kegg, One-Line Machine and Process Diagnostics,, CIRP Ann., vol. 33, no. 2, p.469–473, (1984).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(16)30168-8

[2] V. Dubey, A. K. Sharma, and R. K. Singh, A Technological Review on Temperature Measurement Techniques in Various Machining Processes,, in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, p.55–67.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5151-2_6

[3] R. Mackinnon, G. E. Wilson, and A. J. Wilkinson, Tool Condition Monitoring Using Multi-Component Force Measurements,, Proc. Twenty-Sixth Int. Mach. Tool Des. Res. Conf., p.317–324, (1986).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-08114-1_41

[4] V. Dubey, A. K. Sharma, P. Vats, D. Y. Pimenov, K. Giasin, and D. Chuchala, Study of a multicriterion decision-making approach to the mql turning of aisi 304 steel using hybrid nanocutting fluid,, Materials (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 23, (2021).

DOI: 10.3390/ma14237207

[5] H. Akhiani and J. A. Szpunar, Effect of surface roughness on the texture and oxidation behavior of Zircaloy-4 cladding tube,, Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 285, no. PARTB, p.832–839, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.137

[6] T. S. Ogedengbe et al., The Effects of Heat Generation on Cutting Tool and Machined Workpiece,, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1378, no. 2, (2019).

[7] P. Krishnakumar, K. Rameshkumar, and K. I. Ramachandran, Tool wear condition prediction using vibration signals in high speed machining (HSM) of Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy,, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 50, p.270–275, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.049

[8] Y. Zhou, B. Sun, and W. Sun, A tool condition monitoring method based on two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine and binary differential evolution for milling,, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 166, p.108186, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108186

[9] H. Chang, P. Borghesani, W. A. Smith, and Z. Peng, Application of surface replication combined with image analysis to investigate wear evolution on gear teeth – A case study,, Wear, vol. 430–431, no. May, p.355–368, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.05.024

[10] M. Klaic, Z. Murat, T. Staroveski, and D. Brezak, Tool wear monitoring in rock drilling applications using vibration signals,, Wear, vol. 408–409, no. January, p.222–227, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2018.05.012

[11] J. Kurek et al., Developing automatic recognition system of drill wear in standard laminated chipboard drilling process,, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 64, no. 3, p.633–640, (2016).

DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2016-0071

[12] G. F. Wang, Y. W. Yang, Y. C. Zhang, and Q. L. Xie, Vibration sensor based tool condition monitoring using ν support vector machine and locality preserving projection,, Sensors Actuators, A Phys., vol. 209, p.24–32, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.01.004

[13] V. Pandiyan, W. Caesarendra, T. Tjahjowidodo, and H. H. Tan, In-process tool condition monitoring in compliant abrasive belt grinding process using support vector machine and genetic algorithm,, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 31, p.199–213, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.014

[14] U. Aich and S. Banerjee, Modeling of EDM responses by support vector machine regression with parameters selected by particle swarm optimization,, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 38, no. 11–12, p.2800–2818, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.073

[15] X. Tao and W. Tao, Cutting tool wear identification based on wavelet package and SVM,, Proc. World Congr. Intell. Control Autom., p.5953–5957, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/wcica.2010.5554471

[16] P. Nie, H. Xu, Y. Liu, X. Liu, and Z. Li, Aviation tool wear states identifying based on EMD and SVM,, Proc. 2011 2nd Int. Conf. Digit. Manuf. Autom. ICDMA 2011, vol. 6, p.246–249, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/icdma.2011.67

[17] X. L. Zhang, W. Chen, B. J. Wang, and X. F. Chen, Intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using support vector machine with ant colony algorithm for synchronous feature selection and parameter optimization,, Neurocomputing, vol. 167, p.260–279, (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.04.069

[18] B. Sick, On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: A review of more than a decade of research,, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 16, no. 4, p.487–546, (2002).

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1460

[19] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, Springer Series in Statistics The Elements of Statistical Learning Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction.,.

[20] J. Heaton, Introduction to neural networks with Java. Heaton Research, (2005).

[21] M. S. Alajmi and A. M. Almeshal, Predicting the tool wear of a drilling process using novel machine learning XGBoost-SDA,, Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 21, p.1–16, (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/ma13214952

[22] R. Santhanam, N. Uzir, S. Raman, S. Banerjee, and R. S. Nishant Uzir Sunil R, Experimenting XGBoost Algorithm for Prediction and Classification of Different Datasets Comparative Study of XGBoost4j and Gradient Boosting for Linear Regression View project Experimenting XGBoost Algorithm for Prediction and Classifi cation of Different Datasets,, Int. J. Control Theory Appl., vol. 9, (2016).

[23] Y. Li, X. Meng, Z. Zhang, and G. Song, A Remaining useful life prediction method considering the dimension optimization and the iterative speed,, IEEE Access, vol. 7, p.180383–180394, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2959405

[24] R. S. Peres, J. Barata, P. Leitao, and G. Garcia, Multistage Quality Control Using Machine Learning in the Automotive Industry,, IEEE Access, vol. 7, p.79908–79916, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2923405

[25] L. Munkhdalai, T. Munkhdalai, O. E. Namsrai, J. Y. Lee, and K. H. Ryu, An empirical comparison of machine-learning methods on bank client credit assessments,, Sustain., vol. 11, no. 3, p.1–23, (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/su11030699

[26] J. R. Quinlan, Induction of Decision Trees,, (1986).

[27] V. Sugumaran, V. Muralidharan, and K. I. Ramachandran, Feature selection using Decision Tree and classification through Proximal Support Vector Machine for fault diagnostics of roller bearing,, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 21, no. 2, p.930–942, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.004

[28] L. Rokach and O. Maimon, DATA MINING WITH DECISION TREES.,.

[29] H. C. Phan, T. T. Le, N. D. Bui, H. T. Duong, and T. D. Pham, An empirical model for bending capacity of defected pipe combined with axial load,, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 191, no. March, p.104368, (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104368

[30] V. Dubey, A. K. Sharma, and B. Singh, Optimization of machining parameters in chromium-additive mixed electrical discharge machining of the AA7075/5%B4C composite,, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng., (2021).

DOI: 10.1177/09544089211031755

[31] V. Dubey and B. Singh, Study of Material Removal Rate in Powder Mixed EDM of AA7075/B 4 C Composite,, in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, vol. 5, no. 2, p.7466–7475.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.418

[32] T. Chai and R. R. Draxler, Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature,, Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, p.1247–1250, Jun. (2014).

DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

[33] F. BAYRAKTAR and F. KARA, Investigation of the Effect on Surface Roughness of Cryogenic Process Applied to Cutting Tool,, Int. J. Anal. Exp. Finite Elem. Anal., vol. 7, no. 2, p.19–27, (2020).

[34] M. Bolat, Machining of polycarbonate for optical applications a thesis submitted to the graduate school of natural and applied sciences of middle east technical university,, (2013).

[35] G. Krolczyk and M. Gajek, Predicting the surface roughness in the dry machining of duplex stainless steel (dss),, (2013).