Analysis of the Behavior of Different Steel Alloys Subjected to Uniaxial Mechanical Fully Reversed Fatigue Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

The favorable choice of material for structural elements for a specific purpose of use depends on the properties of the material that define its behavior in given conditions. Considering the possibility of the appearance of different types of mechanical failures during work under defined conditions, this paper deals with research on the behavior of materials subjected to uniaxial mechanical fully reversed fatigue tests at room temperature in an air atmosphere. The research refers to structural steel (S235JRC+C /1.0122), alloyed carbon steel (18CrNi8/1.5920) and chromium martensitic stainless steel (X46Cr13/1.4034). The tests were performed in an air atmosphere at room temperature, and the test results are presented in the form of a stress-life (S-N) diagrams. The fatigue (endurance) limit (/MPa) obtained for each of the tested materials subjected to a mechanical fully reversed fatigue test, (R = - 1), at room temperature, is as follows (material / fatigue limit): 1.0122/202; 1.5920/285; 1.4034/325. In addition, at room temperature, the parameters such as ultimate tensile strength and yield strength, as well as the level of Charpy impact energy, were determined.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

19-24

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N.M. Dowling: Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Pearson, USA 2013).

Google Scholar

[2] K.J. Bathe: Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Inc., USA 1982).

Google Scholar

[3] R.I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R.R. Stephens and H.O. Fuchs: Metal Fatigue in Engineering (John Wiley & Sons, USA 2001).

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Collins: Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design (John Wiley & Sons, USA 1993).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Brnic, G. Turkalj, J. Niu. M. Canadija and D. Lanc: Mater Design 47., 497-504 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.037

Google Scholar

[6] J. Brnic: Analysis of Engineering Structures and Material Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, USA 2018).

Google Scholar

[7] K.P. Mroz, A. Bigos, S. Kucharski, K. Dolinski and E. Bełtowska-Lehman: J Mater Eng Perform 2310, 3459–3466 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-014-1149-7

Google Scholar

[8] J. Brnic, M. Brcic, S. Balos, G. Vukelic, S. Krscanski, M. Milutinovic and M. Dramicanin: Sustainability 13, 5675 (2021).

DOI: 10.3390/su13105675

Google Scholar

[9] J. Brnic, S. Krscanski, M. Brcic, L. Geng, J. Niu and B. Ding: Struct Eng Mech, An International Journal 72, 245-256 (2019).

Google Scholar

[10] Q.C. Kong, Y. Liu, G.D. Liu, C.J. Li, H. Tong and W.M. Gan: J. Adv Manuf Techno 93,1903-1913 (2017).

Google Scholar

[11] P. Rosemann, Th. Mueller, M. Babutzka, A. Heyn: Mater Corros 66, 45-53 (2015).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Brnic, S. Krscanski, D. Lanc, M. Brcic, G. Turkalj, M. Canadija and J. Niu: Materials 10, 388 (2017).

DOI: 10.3390/ma10040388

Google Scholar

[13] ISO 12107:2012 (E). Metallic Materials—Fatigue testing—Statistical Planning and Analysis of Data; ISO Copyright office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, 2nd. ed.; (Cambridge University Press, UK 2003).

Google Scholar

[15] T. Vuherer, P. Maruschak, and I. Samardzic: Metalurgija 51(19), 301-304 (2012).

Google Scholar

[16] T. Vuherer, F. Smaili, E. Bjelajac, M. Manjgo, and G. Lojen: Materials 15(19), 6782 (2022).

DOI: 10.3390/ma15196782

Google Scholar

[17] B. Farahmand, G. Bockraft and J. Glassco: Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics of High Risk Parts

Google Scholar