Electrochemistry Numerical Study of Stress Corrosion Cracking under Near-Neutral Soil Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) is a phenomenon in which cracks develop in certain materials due to a combination of stress and corrosion. This process is commonly observed in low-alloy steels with a ferritic-pearlitic structure, such as X70, which are often used in buried pipeline applications within the oil and gas industry. These materials are particularly susceptible to SCC failure in dilute solutions. To simulate SCC conditions, the Near-neutral simulated soil solution (NS4) has been established as a widely accepted industry standard for conducting crack growth experiments in many laboratories. This paper aims to investigate the role of electrochemistry in SCC under near-neutral soil solution conditions by presenting a numerical study using COMSOL on the effects of applied potential on corrosion rate in near-neutral soil solutions. According to the findings, the electrode thickness, current density, and corrosion rates were mostly affected by an applied potential of -1.2 V. This implies that slight modifications in the applied voltage can greatly influence the corrosion rate of the electrode. This outcome aligns with prior research on the influence of potential on electrode performance and emphasizes the crucial role of precise control of the applied potential in electrochemical systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

37-43

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Frank Cheng, Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipelines, First, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2013.

Google Scholar

[2] M.B. Zamora, R. Galván-Martínez, A. Carmona, M. Baltazar, A. Contreras, R. Orozco-Cruz, Stress Corrosion Cracking of X70 Pipeline Steel Immersed in Synthetic Soil Solution, AFINIDAD. 76 (2019) 52–62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346115287.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Contreras, M. Salazar, A. Carmona, R. Galván-Martínez, Electrochemical noise for detection of stress corrosion cracking of low carbon steel exposed to synthetic soil solution, in: Materials Research, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, 2017: p.1201–1210.

DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0183

Google Scholar

[4] O.I. Zvirko, S.F. Savula, V.M. Tsependa, G. Gabetta, H.M. Nykyforchyn, Stress corrosion cracking of gas pipeline steels of different strength, in: Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier B.V., 2016: p.509–516.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.066

Google Scholar

[5] R.I. Bogdanov, E.M. Gutman, I. V Ryakhovskikh, Y.B. Unigovski, R.Z. Shneck, Stress corrosion cracking of pipeline steels in near-neutral-pH solutions: the role of mechanochemical and chemomechanical effects, AIMS Mater Sci. 6 (2019) 1065–1085.

DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1065

Google Scholar

[6] A. Alsit, M. Alkhedher, H. Hamdan, Crack Propagation in Pipelines Under Extreme Conditions of Near-Neutral PH SCC, Computers, Materials and Continua. 73 (2022) 5315–5329.

DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.031042

Google Scholar

[7] B.Y. Fang, E.H. Han, J.Q. Wang, W. Ke, Stress corrosion cracking of X-70 pipeline steel in near neutral pH solution subjected to constant load and cyclic load testing, Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology. 42 (2007) 123–129.

DOI: 10.1179/174327807X196843

Google Scholar

[8] R.N. Parkins, Current Topics in Corrosion: Factors Influencing Stress Corrosion Crack Growth Kinetics, Corrosion. 43 (1987) 130–139.

DOI: 10.5006/1.3583125

Google Scholar

[9] R. Duddu, N. Kota, S.M. Qidwai, An Extended Finite Element Method Based Approach for Modeling Crevice and Pitting Corrosion, J Appl Mech. 83 (2016).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4033379

Google Scholar

[10] R. Bashir, H. Xue, R. Guo, Y. Bi, M. Usman, Interaction of Cyclic Loading (Low-Cyclic Fatigue) with Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Growth Rate, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2020 (2020) 10.

DOI: 10.1155/2020/8026372

Google Scholar

[11] A. Sainz-Rosales, X. Ocampo-Lazcarro, A. Hernández-Pérez, A.G. González-Gutiérrez, E.R. Larios-Durán, C. Ponce de León, F.C. Walsh, M. Bárcena-Soto, N. Casillas, Classic Evans's Drop Corrosion Experiment Investigated in Terms of a Tertiary Current and Potential Distribution, Corrosion and Materials Degradation. 3 (2022) 270–280.

DOI: 10.3390/cmd3020016

Google Scholar

[12] B.N. Popov, Chapter 3 - Electrochemical Kinetics of Corrosion, in: B.N. Popov (Ed.), Corrosion Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015: p.93–142. https://doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62722-3.00003-3

Google Scholar

[13] X. He, T. Shoji, Quantitative prediction of EAC crack growth rate of sensitized type 304 stainless steel in boiling water reactor environments based on EPFEM, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME. 129 (2007) 460–467.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2748827

Google Scholar

[14] M.A. Mohtadi-Bonab, Effects of different parameters on initiation and propagation of stress corrosion cracks in pipeline steels: A review, Metals (Basel). 9 (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/met9050590

Google Scholar

[15] A. Contreras, M. Salazar, A. Albiter, R. Galvan, O. Veg, Assessment of Stress Corrosion Cracking on Pipeline Steels Weldments Used in the Petroleum Industry by Slow Strain Rate Tests, in: Arc Welding, InTech, 2011.

DOI: 10.5772/26569

Google Scholar

[16] R. Galván‐martínez, R. Orozco‐cruz, A. Carmona‐hernández, E. Mejía‐sánchez, M.A. Morales‐cabrera, A. Contreras, Corrosion study of pipeline steel under stress at different cathodic potentials by EIS, Metals (Basel). 9 (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/met9121353

Google Scholar

[17] L.Y. Xu, Y.F. Cheng, Development of a finite element model for simulation and prediction of mechanoelectrochemical effect of pipeline corrosion, Corros Sci. 73 (2013) 150–160. https://doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.004

Google Scholar