Paper Titles

Analysis of Delay and Dynamic Crosstalk in Spatially Arranged Mixed CNT Bundle Interconnects at Different Technology Nodes
p.39

Preparation and Performance Study of Thermally Conductive Silicone Adhesive Applying in Flip Chip Ball Grid Array
p.47

Study on the Mechanism of Bubble Defects in the PECVD Amorphous Silicon Films on Dielectric Substrate
p.55

Simulation of a Silicon Solar Cell Using Triple-Layer Anti-Reflection Coatings (ARC)
p.61

Improvement of Fatigue Characteristics of Friction Stir Welded A6061-T6 Applying Shot Peening
p.75

Comparative Analysis of FSW and SFSW Welded Joints of EN AW 1200 Aluminum Alloy
p.87

Aspects of the Influence of the Taper Profile of the Welding Tool pin on the Dimensions of FSW and SFSW Welded Joints in EN AW 1200 Aluminum Alloy
p.99

Experimental Study of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement Based on SEM and XRF Analysis
p.111

Mechanical Properties of Concrete Blended with Rice Husk Ash, Oyster Shell Powder, and Ferrous Powder
p.117

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 994Mechanical Properties of Concrete Blended with...

Mechanical Properties of Concrete Blended with Rice Husk Ash, Oyster Shell Powder, and Ferrous Powder

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to emerging global environmental awareness, the increasing demand on synthesizing green materials for structural purposes became prevalent. This study utilized agricultural, aquacultural, and industrial waste as partial replacement for fine aggregates in concrete. One standard and six concrete samples with various proportions (20% and 40%) of rice husk ash (RHA), oyster shell powder (OSP), and ferrous powder (FeP) were constructed and tested for their mechanical properties (i.e., compressive and split tensile strength). The samples containing 20% and 40% FeP attained the highest compressive (22.71 MPa) and split tensile strength (1.379 MPa), respectively, which are closest to the control, M25 grade concrete (C-M25), (23.87 MPa), and (1.44 MPa), respectively. Concrete fracture analysis indicated that the cylinders were well constructed as implied by the fracture types. The C-FeP is the best concrete mixture attaining superior compressive and split tensile strength values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

12th Asia Conference on Mechanical and Materials Engineering & 7th International Conference on Frontiers of Composite Materials (ACMME & ICFCM)

Composite Materials, Friction Stir Welding, Green Concrete and Applied Research

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 994)

Pages:

117-123

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-G8pkRy

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2024

Authors:

Charmelin Kreisle C. Labador, Mon Bryan Z. Gili*, Roy B. Tumlos

Keywords:

Compressive Strength, Ferrous Powder, Oyster Shell, Rice Husk Ash, Tensile Properties

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Bolden, T. Abu-Lebdeh, and E. Fini: Am. J. Environ. Sci. Vol. 9, no. 1 (2013), p.14–24.

[2] H. M. Hamada, B. A. Tayeh, A. Al-Attar, F. M. Yahaya, K. Muthusamy, and A. M. Humada: J. Build. Eng. Vol. 32 (2020) p.101583.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101583

[3] A. Rehman, K. A. Khan, T. Hamid, H. Nasir, I. Ahmad, and M. Alam: Civ. Eng. J. Vol. 6, no. 2 (2020), p.238–257.

[4] H. Song, A. Ahmad, K. A. Ostrowski, and M. Dudek: Materials (Basel) Vol. 14, no. 16 (2021), p.4518.

[5] P. Shafigh, H. Bin Mahmud, M. Z. Jumaat, and M. Zargar: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 53 (2014), p.110–117.

[6] M. I. Albiajawi, R. Embong, and K. Muthusamy: Mater. Today Proc. Vol. 48 (2022), p.778–783.

[7] S. Luhar, T. W. Cheng, and I. Luhar: Compos. Part B Eng. Vol. 175 (2019), p.107076.

[8] J. Zhan, J. Lu, and D. Wang: Rev. Aquac. Vol. 14, no. 1 (2022), p.477–488.

[9] N. Saikia and J. De Brito: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 34 (2012), p.385–401.

[10] S. Bahij, S. Omary, F. Feugeas, and A. Faqiri: Waste Manag. Vol. 113 (2020), p.157–175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.048

[11] K. Kishore and N. Gupta: Mater. Today Proc. Vol. 26 (2020), p.2926–2931.

[12] M. M. Attia, B. A. Abdelsalam, M. Amin, I. S. Agwa, and M. F. Abdelmagied: Buildings Vol. 12, no. 8 (2022), p.1120.

[13] N. Chand, P. Sharma, and M. Fahim: Wear Vol. 269, no. 11–12 (2010), p.847–853.

[14] K. Sakr: J. Mater. Civ. Eng. Vol. 18, no. 3 (2006), p.367–376.

[15] I. S. Mustafa, N. N. Razali, A. Ibrahim, N. Yahaya, and H. M. Kamari: J. Intelek Vol. 9, no. 2 (2016), pp.1-6.

[16] F. R. P. Plando, M. B. Z. Gili, and J. T. Maquiling: Radiat. Phys. Chem. Vol. 208 (2023), p.110916.

[17] I. Y. Hakeem, I. S. Agwa, B. A. Tayeh, and M. H. Abd-Elrahman: Case Stud. Constr. Mater. Vol. 17 (2022), p. e01486.

[18] A. Naqi, S. Siddique, H. K. Kim, and J. G. Jang: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 230 (2020), p.116973.

[19] S. Liu, Y. Zhang, B. Liu, Z. Zou, Q. Liu, Y. Teng, and L. V. Zhang: Materials (Basel). Vol. 15, no. 14 (2022), p.4886.

[20] H. N. Ruslan, K. Muthusamy, S. M. Syed Mohsin, R. Jose, and R. Omar: Mater. Today Proc. Vol. 48 (2022), p.713–719.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.208

[21] ASTM International, "C31/C31M - Standard Specification for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field," in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04:01, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, p.1–6.

[22] ASTM International, "C39/C39M Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens," West Conshohocken, PA, 2016. Information on https://www.astm.org/c0039_c0039m-16.html

[23] ASTM International, "C496/C496M Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens," West Conshohocken, PA, 2017. Information on https://www.astm.org/c0496_c0496m-17.html