Effect of Microcellulose Modified Styrene-Butadiene Emulsion on Mechanical and Hydraulic Properties of Cement-Stabilized Soil

Abstract:

This study investigates the effects of microcellulose (MCC) and styrene-butadiene (SB) emulsion on the properties of cement-stabilized soil. The addition of MCC to cement-stabilized soil resulted in a reduction in hydraulic conductivity due to its water absorption properties, although it did not significantly improve mechanical properties. In contrast, SB emulsion modified cement-stabilized soil exhibited increased toughness and ductility, transitioning from brittle to ductile behavior. Interestingly, the combination of SB emulsion and MCC yielded a gradual decrease in hydraulic conductivity with increasing SB emulsion content. This was attributed to SB emulsion coating the surface of MCC particles, reducing their water absorption capacity and altering their influence on water flow through the soil-cement matrix. Overall, while MCC alone had limited impact on mechanical properties, SB emulsion showed promise for enhancing toughness and ductility. These findings underscore the importance of understanding additive interactions and their effects on the properties of cement-stabilized soil. Further research is needed to optimize additive compositions for specific engineering applications.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 998)
• Pages: 35-42
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-kn4tTK
• Online since: December 2024
• Authors: Wanlop Kitisatorn*
• Keywords: Mechanical Properties, Natural Rubber Latex, Pavement, Soil Cement

References

[1] J. Huang, R.B. Kogbara, N. Hariharan, E.A. Masad, D.N. Little, A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization, Constr. Build. Mater. 305 (2021) 124685.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685

[2] P. Nitnara, P. Pongmuksuwan, W. Kitisatorn, Development of polymer binder for properties enhancement of soil cement, Mater. Today: Proc. 57 (2022) 975–979.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.334

[3] D. Mohan, Z.K. Teong, A.N. Bakir, M.S. Sajab, H. Kaco, Extending cellulose-based polymers application in additive manufacturing technology: A review of recent approaches, Polymers. 12 (2020) 1876.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12091876

[4] E.C. Ramires, J.D. Megiatto, A. Dufresne, E. Frollini, Cellulose nanocrystals versus microcrystalline cellulose as reinforcement of lignopolyurethane matrix, Fibers. 8 (2020) 21.

DOI: 10.3390/fib8040021

[5] A. Ashori, A. Nourbakhsh, Performance properties of microcrystalline cellulose as a reinforcing agent in wood plastic composites, Compos. B: Eng. 41 (2010) 578–581.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.05.004

[6] N. Samat, C.D. Marini, M.A. Maritho, F.A. Sabaruddin, Tensile and impact properties of polypropylene/microcrystalline cellulose treated with different coupling agents, Compos. Interfaces. 20 (2013) 497–506.

DOI: 10.1080/15685543.2013.812767

[7] A. Cataldi, A. Dorigato, F. Deflorian, A. Pegoretti, Thermo-mechanical properties of innovative microcrystalline cellulose filled composites for art protection and restoration, J. Mater. Sci. 49 (2014) 2035–2044.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7892-6

[8] J.A. Lee, M.J. Yoon, E.S. Lee, D.Y. Lim, K.Y. Kim, Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and CNF/polyamide 6 composites, Macromol. Res. 22 (2014) 738–745.

DOI: 10.1007/s13233-014-2121-y

[9] F.A. Santos, M.I.B. Tavares, Development and characterization of hybrid materials based on biodegradable PLA matrix, microcrystalline cellulose and organophilic silica, Polimeros. 24 (2014) 561–566.

DOI: 10.1590/0104-1428.1653

[10] S.K. Bhattacharyya, A. Chakraborty, S. Ghosh, S. Dasgupta, R. Mukhopadhyay, A. Bandyopadhyay, Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as green multifunctional additive (MFA) in emulsion styrene butadiene rubber based high silica compound, Plast. Rubber Compos. 49 (2013) 393–400.

DOI: 10.1179/1743289813y.0000000061

[11] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, United states.

[12] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens, United states.

DOI: 10.1520/d3967-16

[13] A. Lukjan, A. Iyaruk, C. Petchprakob, Soil water retention curve and permeability function of the para rubber bio polymer treated sand, IRR. 15 (2020) 1–7.

[14] Y. Deng, X. Yue, S. Liu, Y. Chen, D. Zhang, Hydraulic conductivity of cement-stabilized marine clay with metakaolin and its correlation with pore size distribution, Eng. Geol. 193 (2015) 146–152.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.018

[15] M. Haghighat, A. Zadhoush, S.N. Khorasani, Physicomechanical properties of α-cellulose-filled styrene-butadiene rubber composites, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 96 (2005) 2203–2211.

DOI: 10.1002/app.21691

[16] S. Rios, R. Chlcurel, L.F. Del Castillo, Potential of particle and fibre reinforcement of tyre tread elastomers, Mater. Des. 22 (2001) 369–374.

DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3069(00)00103-5

[17] J. Wu, D. Qingjun, Y. Wen, W. Luoxin, W. Hua, Influence of submicron fibrillated cellulose fibers from cotton on hydration and microstructure of portland cement paste, Molecules. 26 (2021) 5831.

DOI: 10.3390/molecules26195831