Characterization and Performance of CA/Chitosan Membrane from Golden Snail Shell in the Application of Humic Acid Purification

Article Preview

Abstract:

The removal of humic acid from water is accomplished by a process known asultrafiltration membrane. This study investigates the simple method of preparing cellulose acetate (CA)-based ultrafiltration membranes by introducing chitosan into the dope solution. The result shows the positive effect of incorporating chitosan (1-3 wt%) as a membrane additive on their characteristics and performance. The membranes exhibit improved properties including increased bulk porosity and hydrophilicity. The pure water flux is significantly improved, reaching 100 L/m2.h with 3 wt% chitosan compared to 47 L/m2.h for the pure CA membrane. In particular, the 1% chitosan modification shows optimal performance, achieving high flux (82 L/m2.h) and humic acid rejection (80%). Furthermore, the modified CA membrane shows stability in both acidic and alkaline solutions over a 24 h exposure. These results suggest promising prospects for the application of chitosan-modified CA membranes in efficient water purification processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-34

Citation:

Online since:

December 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. M. K. Le, Q. Dehaine, B. Musuku, N. Schreithofer, and O. Dahl, Sustainable water management in mineral processing by using multivariate variography to improve sampling procedures, Miner. Eng. 172 (2021) 10122-107136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107136

Google Scholar

[2] Y.-L. Cheng et al., We are IntechOpen , the world ' s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists , for scientists TOP 1 %, Intech. 11(2016)

Google Scholar

[3] E. O. Ezugbe and S. Rathilal, Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: A review, Membranes (Basel). 10 (2020) 61- 89.

DOI: 10.3390/membranes10050089

Google Scholar

[4] S. Sonawane, P. Thakur, S. H. Sonawane, and B. A. Bhanvase, Nanomaterials for membrane synthesis: Introduction, mechanism, and challenges for wastewater treatment. Elsevier Inc., 2021. 537-553.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821496-1.00009-x

Google Scholar

[5] C. C. Bioadsorbent, JCNaR Fabrication of Complex Polyelectrolyte Membrane of. 01 (2019) 52–59.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Ma, F. Shi, J. Ma, M. Wu, J. Zhang, and C. Gao, Effect of PEG additive on the morphology and performance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination. 272 (2011) 51–58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.054

Google Scholar

[7] H. Abriyanto, Hydrophilic Modification of PVDF Membrane : a Review, J. Membr. Mater. 1 (2021) 1-9.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Wang, T. Terdkiatburana, and M. O. Tadé, Adsorption of Cu(II), Pb(II) and humic acid on natural zeolite tuff in single and binary systems, Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008) 64-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.004

Google Scholar

[9] A. El-Gendi, H. Abdallah, A. Amin, and S. K. Amin, Investigation of polyvinylchloride and cellulose acetate blend membranes for desalination, J. Mol. Struct. 1146 (2017) 14–22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.05.122

Google Scholar

[10] P. Baharlouei and A. Rahman, Chitin and Chitosan : Prospective Biomedical Applications in, Mar. Drugs. 20 (2022) 447- 460.

DOI: 10.3390/md20070460

Google Scholar

[11] L. Qian, K. Zhang, X. Guo, and M. Yu, What happens when chitin becomes chitosan? A single-molecule study, RSC Adv. 13 (2023) 2294–2300.

DOI: 10.1039/d2ra07303j

Google Scholar