High-Temperature Oxidation of AISI441 Ferritic Stainless Steel for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Article Preview

Abstract:

Several ferritic stainless steel grades are widely studied and used in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) technology as interconnect materials. Their high-temperature oxidation behavior is interesting to evaluate their applicability at SOFCs operating conditions and to design degradation tests and models predicting the lifetime of a SOFC stack. In this work the AISI441 grade was oxidized in static air at 850°C to study its oxidation kinetic by weight gain measurements. It was found a parabolic growth with a rate constant of 9.42 x 10-14 g2cm-4s-1. Data calculated using the diffusion coefficients of the species involved in the oxidation process resulted in higher weight gain. Discrepancies between the measurements and the model were corrected taking into account the chromium volatilization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1016)

Pages:

1381-1385

Citation:

Online since:

January 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Piccardo, A. Pecunia, V. Bongiorno, R. Spotorno, Z. Wuillemin, J. P. Ouweltjes, Aging of Materials at Inlet and Outlet Fuel Manifolds in a SOFC Stack, ECS Transactions 68 (2015) 2611-2624.

DOI: 10.1149/06801.2611ecst

Google Scholar

[2] V. Bongiorno, P. Piccardo, S. Anelli, R. Spotorno, Influence of Surface Finishing on High-Temperature Oxidation of AISI Type 444 Ferritic Stainless Steel Used in SOFC Stacks, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 30(8) (2017) 697-711.

DOI: 10.1007/s40195-017-0543-1

Google Scholar

[3] Z. B. Stoynov, D. E. Vladikova, B. G. Burdin, J. Laurencin, D. Montinaro, A. Nakajo, P. Piccardo, A. Thorel, M. Hubert, R. Spotorno, A. Chesnaud, Differential Resistance Analysis - A New Tool for Evaluation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Degradation, MRS Advances 2 (2017) 3991-4003.

DOI: 10.1557/adv.2017.592

Google Scholar

[4] R. Spotorno, P. Piccardo, F. Perrozzi, Interaction between Crofer 22 APU Current Collector and LSCF Cathode Contacting Layer under Cell Operation, ECS Transaction 68 (2015) 1633-1640.

DOI: 10.1149/06801.1633ecst

Google Scholar

[5] AperamÒK41X datasheet.

Google Scholar

[6] J.G. Grolig J. Froitzheim J.-E. Svensson, Coated stainless steel 441 as interconnect material for solid oxide fuelcells: Oxidation performance and chromium evaporation, Journal of Power Sources 248 (2014) 1007-1013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.089

Google Scholar

[7] H. Hindam and D.P. Whittle, Microstructure, Adhesion and Growth Kinetics of Protective Scales on Metal and Alloys, Oxid. Met. 18 (1982) 245-284.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00656571

Google Scholar

[8] A. C. S. Sabioni, A. M. Huntz, F. Millot, C. Monty, Self-diffusion in Cr2O3 III. Chromium and oxygen grain-boundary diffusion in polycrystals, Philos Mag A 66 (1992) 361-374.

DOI: 10.1080/01418619208201562

Google Scholar

[9] S.C. Tsai, A.M. Huntz, C.Dolin, Growth mechanism of Cr2O3 scales: oxygen and chromium diffusion, oxidation kinetics and effect of yttrium, Mater. Sci. Eng. A212 (1996) 6-13.

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10173-8

Google Scholar

[10] P. Kofstad and K. P. Lillerud, On High Temperature Oxidation of Chromium, J. Electrochem. Soc. 127 (1980) 2410-2419.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2129481

Google Scholar

[11] C. Key, J. Eziashi, J. Froitzheim, R. Amendola, R. Smith, and P. Gannon, Methods to Quantify Reactive Chromium Vaporization from Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Interconnects, J. Electrochem. Soc. 161 (2014) C373-C381.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0041409jes

Google Scholar

[12] R. Spotorno, P. Piccardo, F. Perrozzi, S. Valente, M. Viviani, A. Ansar, Microstructural and Electrical Characterization of Plasma Sprayed Cu-Mn Oxide Spinels as Coating on Metallic Interconnects for Stacking Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 15(5) (2015) 728-734.

DOI: 10.1002/fuce.201400189

Google Scholar