Analysis of the Influence of Different Construction Joints on the Ductility of Cast-in-Place Frame Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article through to the two common cast-in-situ frame structure (casting of a whole, with a construction joint) and 6 root not construction joints under axial pressure ratio through concrete columns of different processing low reversed cyclic loading experiment, study their experimental phenomena, hysteresis curves, displacement ductility, stiffness degradation, thus draw the conclusion: 1, the existence of the construction joint can lead to the decline of ductility of frame structure. 2. When the test axial pressure is relatively low, the presence or absence of construction joints and different treatment methods will obviously affect the ductility of the cast-in-place frame structure. 3. When the test axial pressure is relatively high, the presence or absence of construction joints and different treatment methods will not have a significant impact on the ductility of the cast-in-place frame structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1020)

Pages:

104-113

Citation:

Online since:

February 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Su Qiang. Some suggestions on construction joint treatment [J]. Building safety, 2018,33 (07): 63-65.

Google Scholar

[2] Yuan Guodong, Liu Ning. Waterproof and leakage blocking treatment technology for concrete expansion joints, construction joints and fracture joints [J]. Low carbon world, 2018 (06): 46-47.

Google Scholar

[3] Yan Minglei. Prevention and control measures for leakage at construction joint of side wall of metro station [J]. Architectural technology development, 2019,46 (17): 148-149.

Google Scholar

[4] Xie Jianshu. Discussion on construction joint reservation and technical treatment of construction projects [J / OL]. Henan building materials, 2018 (04): 229 [2019-12-09]. Https://doi.org/10.16053/j.cnki.hnjc.2018.04.118.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Jian. Finite element analysis of construction joint of cast-in-place reinforced concrete frame [D]. Dalian University of technology, (2017).

Google Scholar

[6] Fang Dengjia. Seismic damage analysis and experimental study of RC base isolation frame considering construction joint [D]. Lanzhou University of technology, (2018).

Google Scholar

[7] Yu Jing, Shi Guodong. Experimental study on the influence of construction joints on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear walls [J]. Journal of building structures, 2016 (4): 18-25.

Google Scholar

[8] Li Hongbo. Study on the influence of construction joints on the seismic performance of frame structures [D]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University of technology, (2015).

Google Scholar

[9] Jing Yu,Lesley H. Sneed,Yuhui Zhao. Effect of construction joints on the seismic performance of RC structural walls[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,201.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109793

Google Scholar

[10] Jing Zhou, Fangping He, Tian Liu.Curvature ductility of columns and structural displacement ductility in RC frame structures subjected to ground motions[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014,63:174-183.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.009

Google Scholar

[11] Weichen Xue,Xinlei Yang,Seismic Tests of Precast Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames.PCI Journal,2010,55(3):102-121.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.06012010.102.121

Google Scholar

[12] JUBUM KIM.Behavior of Hybrid Frames Under Seismic Loading[D]. Deptartment of Civil & Environment Engineering.University of Washington, 2012:74-78.

Google Scholar

[13] ENGLEKIRK, ROBERT E.Development and Testing of a Ductile Connector for Assembling Precast Concrete Beams and Column[J].PCI Journal, 2011(2):36-50.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03011995.36.51

Google Scholar

[14] ERTAS, ONUR, SEVKET OZDEN,et al.Ductile Connections in Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames[J]. PCI Journal, 2011(3):66-76.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05012006.66.76

Google Scholar

[15] MORGEN, BRIAN G, YAHYA C KURAMA. Seismic Design of Friction-Damped Precast Concrete Frame Structures[A]. Proceedings of the Structures Congress and Exposition, Metropolis and Beyond-Proceedings of the Structures Congress and Exposition, Metropolis and Beyond-Proceedings of the 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering[C]. Symposium, 2011:2007-2018.

DOI: 10.1061/40753(171)199

Google Scholar

[16] National standard of the people's Republic of China. Code for acceptance of construction quality of concrete structures (GB 50204-2015). Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, (2015).

Google Scholar

[17] Li Wei, Wang Fengguang, Zhang Weihui. Discussion on anti sliding checking calculation of horizontal construction joint of class I seismic wall [J]. Building structure, 2019,49 (05): 96-99.

Google Scholar

[18] Hu Wenbo, Zhai Ximei, Jiang Hongbin. Study on seismic performance and structural scheme optimization of prefabricated reinforced concrete integrated shear wall [J]. Journal of building structures, 2016,37 (08): 1-10.

Google Scholar

[19] LV Wenlong, Shen Chaoyong, long min. experimental study on new ring beam joint of old reinforced concrete column and new beam connection and its seismic performance [J]. Industrial building, 2019,49 (04): 187-190 + 186.

Google Scholar

[20] Liu Ruixin, Wang Min, Chen Xiaolei, Zhu Wenbo, Fu Jianping. Experimental study on seismic performance of HRB500 reinforced small span to height ratio slotted beam with slab [J]. Civil architecture and environmental engineering, 2016,38 (01): 9-16.

Google Scholar