Influence of Vertical Diffusion Cell Set-Up on In Vitro Silver Sulfadiazine Drug Release from Thermo-Responsive Cellulose Hydrogel

Article Preview

Abstract:

In-vitro drug release is used to measure the release of the silver sulfadiazine (SSD) from thermo-responsive cellulose hydrogel using a vertical diffusion cell (VDC). However, selected VDC set-up used by researchers are random, and the studies are lacking in information on the challenging sink conditions during in-vitro drug release study. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of VDC set-up on the in-vitro SSD drug release from thermo-responsive cellulose hydrogel. VDC set-up including receptor medium composition, membrane type, and stirring speed were studied. The results depicted that SSD release rate increased with increasing ammonia percentage in phosphate buffer solution. On the other hand, membrane type do not influence SSD release rate. While, increasing stirring speed results in forming vortex or air bubble entrapment underneath the membrane. 0.25 v/v% ammonia receptor medium, cellulose membrane or polysulfone membrane, and 600 rpm stirring speed are the optimum VDC set-up, confirming sink condition and discriminating ability of this optimum VDC set-up. This work has successfully studied the influence of VDC set-up on in-vitro SSD drug release from thermo-responsive cellulose hydrogel, and the optimum VDC set-up was selected.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1030)

Pages:

19-26

Citation:

Online since:

May 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Q. Chai, Y. Jiao, and X. Yu, Hydrogels for biomedical applications: Their characteristics and the mechanisms behind them, Gels 3 (2017) 6.

DOI: 10.3390/gels3010006

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Teow, K. Ming, and A. Mohammad, Synthesis of cellulose hydrogel for copper (II) ions adsorption, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 4588–4597.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.07.010

Google Scholar

[3] L. J. del Valle, A. Díaz, and J. Puiggalí, Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Cellulose, Chitosan, and Protein/Peptide Derivatives, Gels 3 (2017) 1–28.

DOI: 10.3390/gels3030027

Google Scholar

[4] M. Onofrei and A. Filimon, Cellulose-based hydrogels : Designing concepts, properties, and perspectives for biomedical and environmental applications, Polym. Sci. (2012) 108–120.

Google Scholar

[5] J. J. Escobar-Chávez, M. López-Cervantes, A. Naïk, Y. N. Kalia, D. Quintanar-Guerrero, and A. Ganem-Quintanar, Applications of thermo-reversible pluronic F-127 gels in pharmaceutical formulations, J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 9 (2006) 339–358.

DOI: 10.18433/j3201z

Google Scholar

[6] M. Marques et al., Topical and transdermal drug products, Pharmacopeial Forum 35 (2009) 750–764.

Google Scholar

[7] V. P. Shah, J. Elkins, S. Shaw, and R. Hanson, In vitro release: Comparative evaluation of vertical diffusion cell system and automated procedure, Pharm. Dev. Technol. 8 (2003) 97–102.

DOI: 10.1081/pdt-120017528

Google Scholar

[8] R. R. Klein, J. L. Heckart, and K. D. Thakker, In Vitro Release Testing Methodology and Variability with the Vertical Diffusion Cell (VDC), Dissolution Technol. (2018) 52–61.

DOI: 10.14227/dt250318p52

Google Scholar

[9] S. Klein, Influence of different test parameters on in vitro drug release from topical diclofenac formulations in a vertical diffusion cell setup, Pharmazie 68 (2013) 565–571.

Google Scholar

[10] E. Ghedini et al., Sulfadiazine-based drug delivery systems prepared by an effective sol–gel process, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 83 (2017) 618–626.

DOI: 10.1007/s10971-017-4446-4

Google Scholar

[11] N. M. Morsi, G. A. Abdelbary, and M. A. Ahmed, Silver sulfadiazine based cubosome hydrogels for topical treatment of burns: Development and in vitro/in vivo characterization, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 86 (2014) 178–189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.04.018

Google Scholar

[12] USP, Buffer Solutions, United States Pharmacopoeia 41 (2018) 5748–5749.

Google Scholar

[13] F. M. Mustafa and H. A. Hodali, Use of mesoporous silicate nanoparticles as drug carrier for mefenamic acid, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 92 (2015).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/92/1/012018

Google Scholar

[14] S. Dharashivkar, S. Sahasrabuddhe, and A. Saoji, Silver sulfadiazine niosomes: A novel sustained release once a day formulation for burn treatment, Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 6 (2014) 611–616.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Ng, J. Rouse, D. Sanderson, and G. Eccleston, A Comparative Study of Transmembrane Diffusion and Permeation of Ibuprofen across Synthetic Membranes Using Franz Diffusion Cells, Pharmaceutics 2 (2010) 209–223.

DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics2020209

Google Scholar

[16] H. A. Pawar and P. R. Joshi, Development and Validation of a Discriminating In Vitro Dissolution Method for Oral Formulations Containing Satranidazole , Int. J. Spectrosc. 2014 (2014) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1155/2014/624635

Google Scholar

[17] A. Luís, M. Ruela, A. G. Perissinato, M. Esselin, and D. S. Lino, Evaluation of skin absorption of drugs from topical and transdermal formulations, Brazilian J. Pharm. Sci. 52 (2016) 527–544.

DOI: 10.1590/s1984-82502016000300018

Google Scholar

[18] Q. Bao and D. J. Burgess, Perspectives on Physicochemical and In Vitro Profiling of Ophthalmic Ointments, Pharm. Res. 35 (2020) 234.

DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2513-3

Google Scholar

[19] P. Liu et al., Dissolution studies of poorly soluble drug nanosuspensions in non-sink conditions, AAPS PharmSciTech 14 (2013) 748–756.

DOI: 10.1208/s12249-013-9960-2

Google Scholar

[20] R. Neupane, S. H. S. Boddu, J. Renukuntla, R. J. Babu, and A. K. Tiwari, Alternatives to biological skin in permeation studies: Current trends and possibilities, Pharmaceutics 12 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020152

Google Scholar