Development of a Test Bench for the Investigation of Thermoplastic-Thermoset Material Combinations in Additive Manufacturing

Abstract:

To enhance the mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated parts, the process integrates continuous fibers. Currently, fibers are impregnated either with thermoplastics or with thermoset material, which is completely cured before printing and later combined with thermoplastic filament during the coextrusion process. A major problem about using cured thermoset matrix for the fibers is an insufficient bond between the fiber matrix and the thermoplastic material. A new approach proposed by the authors combine uncured thermoset matrices with thermoplastic filaments to form a substance-to-substance bond. To investigate the material and bonding behavior, a test bench is constructed. Its main purpose is to replicate the coextrusion of thermoplastic filament and thermoset impregnated continuous fibers. Parameters, such as temperature, tension and extrusion speed can be adjusted within the setup to accurately simulate the additive manufacturing process. Aluminum blocks including heater cartridges and thermocouples act as hot ends and impregnation units. Heated blocks compact the fiber strands. We tested different heating blocks containing flat and curved geometries including actual additive manufacturing nozzles to evaluate the impregnation behavior of the dry carbon fiber filaments. Approaches with additive manufacturing nozzles show the most promising results regarding fiber impregnation with thermoplastic material.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1067)
• Pages: 107-112
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-3nvb83
• Online since: August 2022
• Authors: Daniela Schreil*, Georgi Zhilev, Alexander Matschinski, Klaus Drechsler
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Coextrusion, Fiber Impregnation, Thermoset-Thermoplastic Material Combination

References

[1] Sanei SHR, Popescu D. 3D-Printed Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Systematic Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2020;4(3):98.

DOI: 10.3390/jcs4030098

[2] Yasa E, Ersoy K. A Review on the Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium;2018:1024–33.

[3] Mark GT, Benhaim D, et al. Methods for Fiber Reinforced AM(US 9,694,544 B2); (2017).

[4] Azarov AV, Golubev MV, Antonov FK, Khaziev AR. Print Head for Additive Manufacturing of Articles - European Patent Office - EP 3611007 A1(EP 3611007A1); (2020).

[5] Mason H, Gardiner G. 3D printing with continuous fiber: A landscape. [July 29, 2021].

[6] Dickson AN, Abourayana HM, Dowling DP. 3D Printing of Fibre-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Using Fused Filament Fabrication-A Review. Polymers 2020;12(10).

DOI: 10.3390/polym12102188

[7] Azarov AV, Antonov FK, Golubev MV, Khaziev AR. Production of Articles made of Composite Materials by 3D-Printing Method(US 2020/0230878 A1); (2020).

[8] Mark GT. Methods for Fiber Reinforced AM(US 2019/0168451 A1); (2019).

[9] Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, Jeong T-K, Asahara H, Horiguchi K et al. Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 2016;6:23058.

DOI: 10.1038/srep23058

[10] Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q, Li D. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Composites Part A 2016;88:198–205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032

[11] Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP. Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using AM. Addit. Manuf. 2017;16:146–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004

[12] Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens. Polymer Testing 2018;69(7):157–66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020

[13] Dey A, Yodo N. A Systematic Survey of FDM Process Parameter Optimization and Their Influence on Part Characteristics. JMMP 2019;3(3):64.

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp3030064

[14] Solomon IJ, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Materials Today: Proceedings 2021;37(1):509–14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484

[15] Jasiuk I, Abueidda DW, Kozuch C, Pang S, Su FY, McKittrick J. An Overview on Additive Manufacturing of Polymers. JOM 2018;70(3):275–83.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-017-2730-y

[16] SGL Carbon. Product Data Sheet SIGRAFIL® C SB70-3.3/240-R100.

[17] LehmannVoss. LUVOCOM 3F PAHT 9825 NT. [September 22, 2021]; Available from: https://www.luvocom.de/fileadmin/user_upload/luvocom/Downloads/LUVOCOM_3F_PAHT_9825_NT.pdf.

[18] Hexcel Corporation. HexFlow® RTM6: 180 °C Mono-component epoxy system for Resin Transfer Moulding and Infusion technologies. [September 22, 2021]; Available from: https://www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw/RTM6_DataSheetPDF.pdf.

[19] Gorton BS. Interaction of nylon polymers with epoxy resins in adhesive blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 1964(8):1287–95.

DOI: 10.1002/app.1964.070080319

[20] Choe Y, Kim M, Kim W. In Situ Detection of the Onset of Phase Separation and Gelation in Epoxy/Anhydride/Thermoplastic Blends. Macromolecular Research 2003;11(4):267–72.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03218363

[21] Heflin D, et al. Impact Behavior of Epoxy-Polyamide Hybrid Laminates. SAMPE Europe (2020).

[22] Menczel JD, Prime RB. Thermal Analysis of Polymers: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; (2009).