The Effect of Horn Beetle Nano Chitosan (Xylotrupes gideon) on the Surface Roughness of Glass-Ionomer Cement

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding horn beetle nano chitosan (NCH) to Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) liquid on surface roughness. The evaluation was done before and after the addition of NCH and from the length of time soaking in artificial saliva. The disc sample with a diameter of 6 mm and a height of 3 mm of total 40 samples were divided into four groups: the GIC control group, GIC modified NCH 0.5%, 1%, and 2%. Each sample was immersed for 24 hours and seven days in artificial saliva. Surface roughness before and after immersion was measured using the Surtronic S-100 Series Surface Roughness Tester. Data analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA test to determine the effect of adding horn beetle NCH and paired t-test to determine the effect of immersion time on the surface roughness of GIC. Although the highest surface roughness values were found in sample GIC modified NCH 1% (2.51±0.86 for 24 hours) and in sample GIC modified NCH 2% (2.64±0.84 for 7 days), there was no significant differences for both the surface roughness with the addition of NCH (p > 0.05) and the length of immersed time (p > 0.05). As the conclusion, there is no effect of horn beetle nano chitosan to GIC surface roughness. However, the addition of horn beetle NCH presented rougher surfaces after immersion. These experiments can help predict the performance of these materials under clinical conditions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1069)

Pages:

161-166

Citation:

Online since:

August 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F.A.P. Rizzante, R.S. Cunali, J.F.S. Bombonatti, G.M. Correr, C.C. Gonzaga, A.Y. Furuse. Indications and restorative techniques for glass ionomer cement. RSBO. 12 (2016) 79.

DOI: 10.21726/rsbo.v12i1.733

Google Scholar

[2] M. Almuhaiza. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry: A critical appraisal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 17 (2016) 331-336.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1850

Google Scholar

[3] R.S. Kumar, N. Ravikumar, S. Kavitha, S. Mahalaxmi, R. Jayasree, T.S. Kumar, et al. Nanochitosan modified glass ionomer cement with enhanced mechanical properties and fluoride release. Ijbiomac. 104 (2017) 1860-1865.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.120

Google Scholar

[4] K.J. Anusavice, R.W. Phillips, C. Shen, H.R. Rawls. Phillips Science of Dental Materials,. 12th ed. St.Louis, Mo.: Elsevier/Saunders. 2013;(2012).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Komariah, R.A. Tatara, D.A. Bustami. Efficacy of Rhinoceros Beetle (Xylotrupes Gideon) Nano Chitosan and Calcium Mouthwash in Reducing Quantity Oral Cavity Bacteria among Elementary School Age Children. IJABBR. 5 (2017) 41-47.

DOI: 10.18869/ijabbr.2016.237

Google Scholar

[6] G. Davis. The coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinocheos) with articular reference to the palau islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Buletin. 212 (2001) 267-304.

Google Scholar

[7] R.C.F. Cheung, T.B. Ng , J.H. Wong, W.Y. Chan, Chitosan: An update on potential biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Mar., Drugs. 13 (2015) 5156-5186.

DOI: 10.3390/md13085156

Google Scholar

[8] S. Sidhu, J. Nicholson. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 7 (2016) 16.

Google Scholar

[9] G.J. Mount. An Atlas of Glass-Ionomer Cement: A Clinician's Guide, third ed. Medicine & Health Science Books. (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Tjandrawinata, M.W. Handoko, Octarina. The Effect of Nanofilled Resin Coating on the Hardness of Glass Ionomer Cement. Sci Dent J. 4 (2020) 97-100.

DOI: 10.4103/sdj.sdj_5_20

Google Scholar

[11] C.M.L. Bollen, P. Lambrechts, M. Quirynen. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 13 (1997) 258-269.

DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3

Google Scholar

[12] R.S. Sayed, H.A. Shalaby, Y.F. Hussein Ali, N.K. Soliman. Surface Durability of Newly Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Chitosan. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 15 (2018) 75–83.

Google Scholar

[13] O. Bala, H.D. Arisu, I. Yikilgan, S. Arslan, A. Gullu. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent. 6 (2012) 79–86.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698934

Google Scholar

[14] K. Soygun, A. Soygun, M.C. Dogan. The effects of chitosan addition to glass ionomer cement on microhardness and surface roughness. JABFM. 19 (2021) 1–10.

DOI: 10.1177/2280800021989706

Google Scholar

[15] R.C.D. Silva, A.C.C. Zuanon. Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Braz Dent J. 17 (2006) 106-109.

DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000200004

Google Scholar

[16] F. Sharafeddin, Z. Jowkar, S. Bahrani, Comparison between the effect of adding microhydroxyapatite and chitosan on surface roughness and microhardness of resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cements, J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 13 8 (2021) e737–e744.

DOI: 10.4317/jced.55996

Google Scholar