Tensile Strength and Shore Hardness Evaluation in Clean Grade Silicone with Nanosilica Filler Reinforcement as an Alternative for Maxillofacial Prosthesis Materials

Abstract:

Maxillofacial prostheses are usually replaced periodically due to poor tear strength at the edges, inelasticity, and excessive hardness. Improvement in mechanical properties can be achieved by adding nanosilica fillers. Medical grade silicone as a maxillofacial prosthesis material is difficult to find on the local market and is quite expensive. Therefore, it is necessary to have an alternative maxillofacial prosthesis material that is more affordable and accessible. Clean grade silicone is a non-toxic type of silicone that can be modified by adding nanosilica filler to have properties similar to medical silicones so that they can be accepted as an alternative to maxillofacial prosthesis materials. The samples were made from clean grade silicone with various addition of nanosilica fillers: 0% (control), 1%, 2%, 3%, and 6%. Tensile strength was tested on each sample according to ISO 37: 2017 for silicone rubber. Dumb-bell shape samples were tested on Llyod Universal Testing Machine with 500 mm/min transverse rates. Hardness was tested on each sample according to the ASTM D2240 for silicone rubber. Six indentations were carried out on a rectangle sample (36 x 60 x 6 mm) tested with Durometer type A. The hardness result increased from 15,7 to 42,8 Shore A, while tensile strength decreased from 3.38 to 2.14 MPa. This could happen due to the agglomeration of silica filler concentration and need further research on the ratio and method for mixing. So, it can be concluded that the addition of 3% nanosilica filler resulted in acceptable tensile strength and hardness value as a substitute for maxillofacial prosthesis material.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1069)
• Pages: 145-152
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-q96742
• Online since: August 2022
• Authors: Inez Kiantoro*, Taufik Sumarsongko, Lisda Damayanti, Veni Takarini
• Keywords: Clean Grade Silicone, Hardness, Maxillofacial Silicone Material, Nanosilica Filler, Tensile Strength

References

[1] de Caxias FP, dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Goiato MC, Classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis, Int J Dent, 2019 (2019) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1155/2019/8657619

[2] Alla RK, Dental Material Science, first ed, New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers, (2013).

[3] Winnan HW, Silicone elastomers, Vol. 165, European Rubber J,(1983).

[4] Buser R, Yue Q, Zimmermann P, Suter V, Abou-Ayash S, Schimmel M, Prosthodontic solutions for elderly patients. Forum Implantology. 14 (2018) 130–40.

[5] Information on: https://www.stasherbag.com/blogs/stasher-life/food-grade-silicone-what-is-it-and-why-is-it-better-than-plastic.

[6] Aziz T, Waters M, Jagger R, development of a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) maxillofacial prosthetic material, J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater, 65 (2003) 252–61.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10559

[7] Barman A, Rashid F, Farook TH, Jamayet N Bin, Dudley J, Yhaya MF Bin, et al., The influence of filler particles on the mechanical properties of maxillofacial prosthetic silicone elastomers: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Polymers (Basel). 12 (2020) 1–16.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12071536

[8] Kalamarz I, Chladek G, Pokój M, Łukowiec D, Krawczyk C, Stencel R, et al., The properties of experimental silicones reinforced with silica fillers for dentistry, Arch Mater Sci Eng, 81 (2016) 22–9.

DOI: 10.5604/18972764.1229622

[9] Deba K, Yunus N, Kumar V, Ahmad N, Oral & maxillofacial prosthetics-ii: materialistic approach, Heal Talk. 04 (2012) 18–20.

[10] Qenae N Al, Nano Ceramic Fiber Reinforced Silicone Maxillofacial Prosthesis, 2010, p.85.

[11] Azeez ZA, Tukmachi MS, Mohammed DH, Effect of silver-zinc zeolite addition on mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone, Int J Med Res Heal Sci, 7 (2018) 19–29.

[12] Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Powell SK, Woodruff MA, Advancements in soft-tissue prosthetics part b: the chemistry of imitating life, Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8 (2020) 1–23.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00147

[13] Yeh H, Effect of Silica Filler On The Mechanical Properties Of Silicone Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Indiana University, (2014).

[14] Mazurek P, Vudayagiri S, Skov AL, How to tailor flexible silicone elastomers with mechanical integrity: A tutorial review, Chem Soc Rev, 48 (2019) 1448–64.

DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00963e

[15] Mitra A, Choudhary S, Garg H, Jagadeesh HG, Maxillofacial prosthetic materials-an inclination towards silicones, J Clin Diagnostic Res, 8 (2014) ZE08-ZE13.