Cytotoxicity Evaluation on Clean Grade Silicone Reinforced with Nanosilica Filler as an Alternative Maxillofacial Prosthesis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Maxillofacial prosthesis is a non-invasive procedure to replace damaged or lost facial tissue structures. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthesis to resemble facial skin tissue is made of silicone. The addition of fillers and pigments to silicone has been done to improve its physical and mechanical properties while maintaining its biocompatibility. This study aims to evaluate the cytotoxicity of nano silica filler and intrinsic pigment additives in clean grade silicone as an alternative material for maxillofacial prosthesis. Thirty clean grade silicone samples were divided into 6 treatment groups: 1 group of silicone without any additives and 5 groups of silicone with addition of intrinsic pigment and nano silica filler with concentration of 0%, 1%, 2%, 3% and 6%. Cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay against 3T3L1 fibroblasts. The average absorbance value for all treatment groups was 0,941-1,105, which was lower than the control group. The post hoc test showed that only the 6% of nano silica and intrinsic pigment additive group did not differ from the control group. The addition of silica nano filler and intrinsic pigment to silicone did not cause toxicity to 3T3L1 cells. The cytotoxicity of nano silica is determined by its particle size and concentration. The use of intrinsic pigments produces compounds that are less reactive to genetic material. In conclusion, the addition of nano silica filler and intrinsic pigment to clean grade silicone as an alternative maxillofacial prosthesis is nontoxic. The addition of 6% nano silica filler and intrinsic pigment to clean grade silicone showed the best cell viability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1069)

Pages:

153-159

Citation:

Online since:

August 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Atay A,Overview of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Nova Biomedic, New York, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] de Caxias FP, dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Goiato MC, Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Int J Dent. 2019 (2019) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1155/2019/8657619

Google Scholar

[3] Reddy Jr, Kumar Bm, Ahila S, Rajendiran S, Materials in maxillo-facial prosthesis, J Indian Acad Dent Spec Res. 2 (2015) 1.

DOI: 10.4103/2229-3019.166094

Google Scholar

[4] Alqutaibi AY, Materials of facial prosthesis: History and advance, Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev. (2015) 215.

Google Scholar

[5] Barhate AR, Gangadhar SA, Bhandari AJ, Joshi AD, Materials used in maxillofacial prosthesis: A review, Pravara Medical Review. 7 (2015) 5–8.

Google Scholar

[6] Abraham HM, Krishanga S, Philip JM, Venkatakrishnan CJ, Chandran CR, A review of materials used in maxillofacial prosthesis - part 2, Drug Invent Today. 10 (2018) 1569–73.

Google Scholar

[7] Manappallil J, Maxillofacial Prosthetic Materials, Basic Dent Mater. 3 (2016) 572.

Google Scholar

[8] Totu EE, Cristache CM, Pereieany VS, Burlibasa M, Petre DC, Burlibasa L, Are nano TiO2 inclusions improving biocompatibility of photocurable polytimethylsiloxane for maxillofacial prothesis manufacturing, Appl. Sci, 11 (2021) 1-14.

DOI: 10.3390/app11093777

Google Scholar

[9] Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Indonesia. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. 88 (2009) 1–155.

DOI: 10.30649/ph.v21i2.16

Google Scholar

[10] Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Powell SK, Woodruff MA, Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part B: The Chemistry of Imitating Life, Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 8 (2020) 1–23.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00147

Google Scholar

[11] Djustiana N, Takarini V, Hasratiningsih Z. Preliminary study on cells viability based on toxicity effect of varnish fluoride made from Indonesian de-waxed shellac. Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry. 31 (2019) 136-141.

DOI: 10.24198/pjd.vol31no2.22657

Google Scholar

[12] Pintor Avb, Queiroz LD, Barcelos R, Primo LSG, Maia LC, Alves GG, MTT versus other cell viability assays to evaluate the biocompatibility of root canal filling materials : a systematic review, International Endodontic Journal. 52 (2020) 1348-73.

DOI: 10.1111/iej.13353

Google Scholar

[13] Bal BT, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Karakoca S, Yilmaz S, In vitro cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: effect of accelerated aging, Wiley Interscience. (2008) 122-6.

Google Scholar

[14] Akay C, Cevik P, Karakis D, Sevim H. in vitro cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomer: effect of nano-particles. Journal of Prosthodontics. (2016) 1-4.

DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12533

Google Scholar

[15] ISO10993-5. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 5: Test for in vitro cytotoxicity. (2009) 28.

Google Scholar

[16] Sumarta NPM, Danudiningrat CP, Rachmat EA, Soesilawati P. Cytotoxicity difference of 316L stainless steel and titanium reconstruction plate. Dent J. 44 (2011) 7-11.

DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v44.i1.p7-11

Google Scholar

[17] Ansarifar A, Lim BY. Reinforcement of silicone rubber with precipitated amorphous white silica nanofiller-Effect of silica aggregates on the rubber properties. Artic J Rubber Res. 9 (2006) 140–58.

DOI: 10.5254/1.3547914

Google Scholar

[18] Mohammad P, Abbasinia M, Assari MJ, Oliaei M. the toxicology of silica nanoparticles: a review. Toxicological & environmental chemistry. (2018).

DOI: 10.1080/02772248.2018.1485921

Google Scholar

[19] Kopylov VM, Kostyleva EI, Kostylev IM, Koviazin A V, Silica fillers for silicone rubber, Int Polym Sci Technol. 38 (2011) 35–47.

DOI: 10.1177/0307174x1103800408

Google Scholar

[20] Kalamarz I, Chladek G, Pokój M, Łukowiec D, Krawczyk C, Stencel R, et al. The properties of experimental silicones reinforced with silica fillers for dentistry. Arch Mater Sci Eng. 81 (2016) 22–9.

DOI: 10.5604/18972764.1229622

Google Scholar

[21] Kohls DJ, Schaefer DW, Kosso R, Feinblum E. Silica fillers for elastomer reinforcement. Curr Top Elastomers Res. (2008) 503–16.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420007183-17

Google Scholar

[22] Mebert AM, Baglole CJ, Desimone MF, Maysinger D. Nanoenginered silica: properties, applications, and toxicity. Food and Chemical toxicology. 109 (2017) 753-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.054

Google Scholar

[23] Wang L, Chen Hu MS, Qi Liu MS, SHao L. The effect of artificial ageing on cytotoxicity of nano-TiO2 silicone elastomer. J. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 5 (2015) 996-1002.

DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2015.1408

Google Scholar