Compression Behavior of Pilar Octahedral Lattice Structures

Abstract:

Lattice structures have a great potential in the fields like aerospace and biomedical, due to their outstanding properties like high strength, low mass, and good energy absorption capacity. With the development of the Additive Manufacturing technologies, there was an increasing attention towards these structures. The compressive behavior of the pilar octahedral lattice structure, which has the high strength to weight ratio was analyzed in this work. Lattice structures with three strut diameters of 1.5, 1.75, and 2 mm were built using Fused Filament Fabrication from Tough Polylactic Acid (PLA) plastic. Quasi-static compression tests were performed and two finite element models using beam elements with and without nodal beam diameter correction were proposed. It was found that as the diameter of the strut increases strength and elastic moduli are increased as well, while specific mechanical properties almost do not change. It was also confirmed from numerical and experimental results that lattice structure fails by forming a diagonal shear band. The relative error of the simulation without nodal correction in predicting the strength of the lattice with a 1.5 mm strut diameter was 1.58%. However, due to the inability of the beam element to model the behavior at the nodes properly its accuracy decreases for larger diameters. By modifying the model and using a nodal beam diameter correction, it has been possible to achieve a relative error of 0.58% and 12.15% for strut diameters of 1.75 and 2 mm respectively.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1087)
• Pages: 143-148
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-8p61q8
• Online since: May 2023
• Authors: Daniyar Syrlybayev, Asma Perveen, Didier Talamona*
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Finite Element Simulations, Fused Filament Fabrication, Lattice Structure

References

[1] C. Boursier Niutta, R. Ciardiello, and A. J. P. Tridello: Polymers Vol. 14 (2022), p.1116

[2] K. M. Abate, A. Nazir, and J.-Y. Jeng: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 112 (2021), pp.2037-2050

[3] S. A. Khanoki and D. Pasini: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials Vol. 22 (2013), pp.65-83

[4] H. Tang, K. Yang, L. Jia, W. He, L. Yang, and X. Zhang: Jom Vol. 72 (2020), pp.1016-1021, (2020)

[5] T. Belcher: Thermal & Fluids Analysis Workshop (TFAWS 2019) (2019)

[6] T. Maconachie et al., "SLM lattice structures: Materials and Design Vol. 183 (2019), p.108137

[7] L. Bai, C. Gong, X. Chen, J. Zheng, J. Yang, K. Li, Y. Sun: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences Vol. 214 (2022), p.106922

[8] R. Saremian, M. Badrossamay, E. Foroozmehr, M. Kadkhodaei, and F. Forooghi: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 112 (2021), pp.2815-2836

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06112-0

[9] A. Bertocco, G. Iannitti, A. Caraviello, and L. Esposito: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2022) pp.1-15

[10] M. Mazur, M. Leary, S. Sun, M. Vcelka, D. Shidid, and M. Brandt: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 84 (2016), pp.1391-1411

[11] M. Leary, M. Mazur, H. Williams, E. Yang, A. Alghamdi, B. Lozanovki, X. Zhang, D. Shadid, L. Farahbod-Sternahl, G. Witt, I. Kelbassa, P. Choong, M. Qian, M. Brandt: Materials and Design, Vol. 157 (2018), pp.179-199.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010

[12] H. Guo, A. Takezawa, M. Honda, C. Kawamura, and M. Kitamura: Computational Materials Science, Vol. 175 (2020), p.109610.

[13] H. Lei, C. Li, J. Meng, H. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, P. Wang, D. Fang: Materials and Desing, Vol. 169 (2019), p.107685.

[14] S. McKown, Y. Shen, W.K. Brookes, C.J. Sutcliffe, W.J. Cantwell, G.S. Langdon, G.N. Nurick, M.D. Theobald: International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 35 (2008), pp.795-810.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.10.005