High Density Polyethylene/Calcium Silicate Hybrid Composite: Preparation, Characterization and In-Vitro Bioactivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

The high density polyethylene/calcium silicate (HDPE/CS) hybrid composites were prepared using a twin-screw extruder and shaped into test specimens using a compression molding machine. The CS loadings, limited to a total of 20 %vol, were incorporated in HDPE matrix. The morphological behavior, thermal behavior, mechanical properties and bioactivity of the composites were investigated and compared with the neat HDPE under identical conditions. It was found that poor dispersion of the CS particles was observed in the composites with high CS loadings because of only weak interaction between CS particles and HDPE. The percentage of HDPE crystallinity was insignificantly changed when adding CS particles in the HDPE/CS composites. The stiffness of the HDPE/CS hybrid composites was strongly improved and reached the maximum values of flexural and compressive moduli at 1190 MPa (35% greater than the neat HDPE) and 581 Ma (17% greater than the neat HDPE), respectively, with 15 % CS loading. The higher the CS loading, the greater the hardness of the HDPE/CS composites were seen. However, the flexural strength of the HDPE/CS composites (up to 15% CS loading) was not considerably altered. Moreover, both flexural and compressive properties were lowered with higher CS content (20%) due to the generated voids in the HDPE/CS composites. After soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF) at 36.5°C for 7–49 days, the HDPE/CS composites could induce the formation of ball-like HA aggregates covering on the composite surface, indicating its bioactivity. This research successfully prepared HDPE/CS hybrid composites with fast rate bioactivity and their modulus and strength values were within those for human trabecular bone. Therefore, the HDPE/CS hybrid composites had potentially used as bioactive materials for medical applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1098)

Pages:

71-76

Citation:

Online since:

September 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. Bonfield, M.D. Grynpas, A.E. Tully, J. Bowman and J. Abram, Hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene--a mechanically compatible implant material for bone replacement, Biomaterials 2 (1981) 185-186.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90050-8

Google Scholar

[2] L.M. Fang, Y. Leng and P. Gao, Processing of hydroxyapatite reinforced ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene for biomedical applications, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3471-3478.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.022

Google Scholar

[3] C. Wu, J. Chang, W. Zhai, S. Ni and J. Wang, Porous akermanite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 78 (2006) 47-55.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30456

Google Scholar

[4] P. Monvisade, P. Siriphannon, R. Jermsungnern and S. Rattanabodee, Preparation of hydroxyapatite/poly(methyl methacrylate) and calcium silicate/poly(methyl methacrylate) interpenetrating hybrid composites, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18 (2007) 1955-1959.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3142-2

Google Scholar

[5] P. Siriphannon, P. Monvisade, S. Jinawath and K. Hemachandra, Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite/poly(ethylene glutarate) biomaterials, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 81 (2007) 381-391.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31032

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Wang, Y. Xiao, X. Huang and M. Lang, Preparation of poly(methyl methacrylate) grafted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles via reverse ATRP, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 360 (2011) 415-421.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.093

Google Scholar

[7] S. Abd-Khorsand, S. Saber-Samandari and S. Saber-Samandari, Development of nanocomposite scaffolds based on TiO2 doped in grafted chitosan/hydroxyapatite by freeze drying method and evaluation of biocompatibility, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 101 (2017) 51-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.067

Google Scholar

[8] C.J. Montaño, T.P.R. Campos, B.R.S. Lemos, M.I. Yoshida, N.G.S. Almeida, M.T.P. Aguilar and C.V. Lima, Effects of hydroxyapatite on PMMA-HAp cement for biomedical applications, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 31 (2020) 191-201.

DOI: 10.3233/bme-206001

Google Scholar

[9] S. Nath, S. Bodhak and B. Basu, HDPE-Al2O3-HAp composites for biomedical applications: processing and characterizations, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 88B (2009) 1-11.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31050

Google Scholar

[10] T. Liu, K. Huang, L. Li, Z. Gu, X. Liu, X. Peng and T. Kuang, High performance high-density polyethylene/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for load-bearing bone substitute: fabrication, in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation, Compos. Sci. Technol. 175 (2019) 100-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.012

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Zhang and K.E. Tanner, Effect of filler surface morphology on the impact behaviour of hydroxyapatite reinforced high density polyethylene composites, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19 (2008) 761-766.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3119-1

Google Scholar

[12] K. Okada, M. Tanuma, Y. Kameshima, A. Nakajima, S. Asai and M. Sumita, Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of CaSiO3/High-density Polyethylene (HDPE) Composites Prepared by A New Surface Loading Method of CaSiO3 Powder, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 298-305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.06.011

Google Scholar

[13] K. Lin, W. Zhai, S. Ni, J. Chang, Y. Zeng and W. Qian, Study of the mechanical property and in vitro biocompatibility of CaSiO3 ceramics, Ceram. Int. 31 (2005) 323-326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.05.023

Google Scholar

[14] P. Siriphannon, Y. Kameshima, A. Yasumori, K. Okada and S. Hayashi, Influence of preparation conditions on the microstructure and bioactivity of α-CaSiO3 ceramics: Formation of hydroxyapatite in simulated body fluid, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 52 (2000), pp.30-39.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<30::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-z

Google Scholar

[15] A. Sathain, P. Monvisade and P. Siriphannon, Bioactive alginate/carrageenan/calcium silicate porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Mater. Today Commun. 26 (2021) 102165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102165

Google Scholar

[16] T.Kokubo and H. Takadama, How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 2907-2915.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[17] S. Rukchonlatee, N. Jaisomboon and T. Sooknoi, Improvement of Water Vapor Permeability of LLDPE/EVA Film with Zeolite A as Filler, Key Eng. Mater. 730 (2017) 31-36.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.730.31

Google Scholar

[18] S.-Y. Fu, X.-Q. Feng, B. Lauke and Y.-W. Mai, Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites, Compos. B. Eng. 39 (2008) 933-961.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002

Google Scholar

[19] E.F. Morgan and T.M. Keaveny, Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site, J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 569-577.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2

Google Scholar