Estimation of Planar and Normal Anisotropy Parameters of Al 8011 Sheets as Cold Rolled and Cold Rolled with Annealed Condition

Rajesh Chaudhari; Ojas Joshi; Neeraj Dargad; Ayush Jain; Jaideep Gaikwad

doi:10.4028/p-erCNO2

Paper Titles

Effect of Austempering Parameters on Microstructure and Tensile/Impact Behaviours of Micro-Alloyed TRIP-Assisted Steel
p.3

Development of a Neural Network Model and Taguchi-Based Optimization for Dry Sliding Wear Performance of Al 6065 Alloy Reinforced with Nano SiC and Graphene Nanoplatelets
p.13

Influence of Ca and Ce Additions on Microstructure and Microhardness of Squeeze-Cast AZ91 Mg Alloy
p.29

Prediction of Surface Roughness of Monel k 500 Super Alloy by Using Artificial Neural Network
p.41

Estimation of Planar and Normal Anisotropy Parameters of Al 8011 Sheets as Cold Rolled and Cold Rolled with Annealed Condition
p.51

Effects of Plasticizers on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Tamarind Kernel Powder Film
p.65

High Density Polyethylene/Calcium Silicate Hybrid Composite: Preparation, Characterization and In-Vitro Bioactivity
p.71

Lignin Particle Production by Spray Dryer with Self-Assembly Technique
p.77

Montmorillonite/Tripolyphosphate Crosslinked Chitosan Nanocomposites for Eco-Friendly Agricultural Applications
p.83

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 1098Estimation of Planar and Normal Anisotropy...

Estimation of Planar and Normal Anisotropy Parameters of Al 8011 Sheets as Cold Rolled and Cold Rolled with Annealed Condition

Abstract:

Aluminium 8011 cast plates subjected to cold rolling to reduce thickness from 12 mm to 3.5 sheets. As rolled aluminium sheet was subjected to annealing treatment after rolling. This work deals with the study of planar and normal anisotropy parameters of as rolled aluminium and rolled with annealed aluminium sheets. The tensile test samples were cut at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° with respect to the rolling direction of as rolled Al sheet and rolled with annealed Al sheet. Tensile properties were measured at different orientations to the rolling directions. The wide variation in tensile strength was found in case of as rolled Al samples at different orientation to rolling direction of sheet (208 to 243 MPa). On the other hand nearly uniform tensile strength (128 MPa to 132 MPa) was measured for rolled and annealed Al samples at different orientations. As rolled Al samples shows anisotropic tensile properties where as isotropic tensile properties were measured for rolled with annealed Al samples. Al grains are more elongated along the rolling directions where as rolled and annealed Al sample shows more equiaxed grains which is attributed to isotropic behaviour of Al sheets. The normal anisotropy parameter or average r_m value is higher (1.24) in case of rolled and annealed sheet sample as compared to as rolled Al sheet r_m value (1.06). This is attributed to isotropic behaviour of rolled and annealed samples. Toughness and ductility properties are improved more than 3 times in case of rolled and annealed Al sheet samples. Annealing treatment of rolled Al sheet samples shows elongated grain morphology changes to equiaxed grains of aluminum which tends to improved formability and isotropic mechanical properties Al sheet. For determination of normal anisotropy (r_m) value, tensile results R values are required at angles of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees. However in this study additional R values are estimated at 30 degree and 60 degree in order to understand trend of R value at every 30 degree from 0 to 90 degree.