The Effect of Nanosilica on the Fresh Properties of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete

Abstract:

The purpose of the current investigation was to lower the CO₂ footprint of an industrial self-compacting concrete mix, which currently consists of CEMI 42.5R solely, without any natural pozzolanas or supplementary cementitious materials. The target compressive strength of the industrial mix needed to exceed 55 MPa at 28 days of curing. In the present study we attempted a 20% reduction of CEMI 42.5R (by total mass of solids) by adding 20% of limestone filler and subsequently added 1% of colloidal nanosilica, aiming (i) at leveraging strength loss due to the reduction of Portland cement, (ii) at providing early strength and (iii) at enhancing the microstructure. A water to binder ratio of 0.42 was selected and superplasticizers were added. Fresh properties were studied in terms of slump-flow test, density and 1-day strength. In addition, the 28 day compressive strength was also tested, meeting the mix design strength requirement. Interestingly, the slump flow was improved, indicating better packing effect, however the compressive strength of the control formulations was higher than that of the nanoenhanced formulation. Further insights are also provided.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1137)
• Pages: 87-92
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-wbzyY5
• Online since: December 2024
• Authors: Styliani Papatzani*, Georgios Hloupis, Pantochara Giatra, Georgios Aslanis
• Keywords: Limestone, Nanosilica, Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC), Sustainable Concrete Mix

References

[1] S. Papatzani, "Effect of nanosilica and montmorillonite nanoclay particles on cement hydration and microstructure," Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, p.138–153, Jan. 2016.

DOI: 10.1179/1743284715y.0000000067

[2] K. L. Scrivener, "Nanotechnology and cementitious materials," Nanotechnol. Constr. 3, p.37–42, 2009.

[3] K. L. Scrivener, "Options for the future of cement," Indian Concr. J., vol. 88, no. 7, p.11–21, 2014.

[4] BSI, BS EN 197-1:2011: Cement. Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BSI, London, UK, 2011.

[5] S. Papatzani and K. Paine, "Polycarboxylate / nanosilica modified quaternary cement formulations - enhancements and limitations," Adv. Cem. Res., vol. 30, no. 6, p.256–269, 2018.

DOI: 10.1680/jadcr.17.00111

[6] S. Papatzani and K. Paine, "Lowering cement clinker: A thorough, performance based study on the use of nanoparticles of SiO2 or montmorillonite in Portland limestone nanocomposites," Eur. Phys. J. Plus, vol. 133, no. 10, p.430, 2018.

DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-12305-6

[7] S. Papatzani, K. Paine, and J. Calabria-Holley, "A comprehensive review of the models on the nanostructure of calcium silicate hydrates," Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 74, p.219–234, 2015.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.029

[8] F. Sanchez and K. Sobolev, "Nanotechnology in concrete–A review," Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 24, no. 11, p.2060–2071, 2010.

[9] S. Papatzani, S. Grammatikos, and K. Paine, "Permeable Nanomontmorillonite and Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Binders," Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 19, p.3245, Oct. 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12193245

[10] S. Papatzani and K. Paine, "Optimization of Low-Carbon Footprint Quaternary and Quinary (37% Fly Ash) Cementitious Nanocomposites with Polycarboxylate or Aqueous Nanosilica Particles," Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2019, p.26, 2019.

DOI: 10.1155/2019/5931306