Comparative Study of Direct Energy Deposition (DED) and Traditional Casting Techniques for 316l Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study presents a comparative analysis of manufacturing techniques for 316L stainless steel, focusing on Direct Energy Deposition (DED) and traditional casting methods. The research aims to evaluate the differences in microstructure, mechanical properties, and overall performance of components produced by these two distinct processes. Through a series of experiments and material characterizations, including microscopic examinations and mechanical testing, we investigate how the manufacturing techniques influence the final properties of 316L stainless steel. Our findings reveal significant variations in grain structure, porosity, and tensile strength, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each method. This comparative study provides valuable insights for industries seeking to optimize their manufacturing processes for high-performance applications, ultimately contributing to the advancement of additive manufacturing technologies and traditional casting techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1166)

Pages:

47-58

Citation:

Online since:

November 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marchese, G.; Parizia, S.; Rashidi, M.; Saboori, A.; Manfredi, D.; Ugues, D.; Lombardi, M.; Hryha, E.; Biamino, S. The role of texturing and microstructure evolution on the tensile behavior of heat-treated Inconel 625 produced via laser powder bed fusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 769, 138500.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138500

Google Scholar

[2] Alsalla, H. H., C. Smith, L. Hao, 2018. Effect of build orientation on the surface quality, microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting 316L stainless steel. Rapid Prototyping Journal.

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-04-2016-0068

Google Scholar

[3] VENUGOPAL, S., et al. Industrial validation of processing maps of 316L stainless steel using hot forging, rolling, and extrusion. Materials science and technology, 1996, 12.11: 955-962.

DOI: 10.1179/mst.1996.12.11.955

Google Scholar

[4] AHN, Dong-Gyu. Directed energy deposition (DED) process: state of the art. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2021, 8.2: 703-742.

DOI: 10.1007/s40684-020-00302-7

Google Scholar

[5] STEELS, High-Strength Low-Alloy. ASM Handbook, Volume 1, Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High Performance Alloys Section: Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001025

Google Scholar

[6] Plaut, R.L.; Herrera, C.; Escriba, D.M.; Rios, P.R.; Padilha, A.F. A Short review on wrought austenitic stainless steels at high temperatures: Processing, microstructure, properties and performance. Mater. Res. 2007, 10, 453–460.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392007000400021

Google Scholar

[7] Dourandish, M.; Godlinski, D.; Simchi, A. 3D printing of biocompatible PM-materials. Mater. Sci. Forum 2007, 534–536, 453–456.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.534-536.453

Google Scholar

[8] Frykholm, R.; Takeda, Y.; Andersson, B.-G.; Carlström, R. Solid state sintered 3-D printing component by using inkjet (binder) method. J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 2016, 63, 421–426.

DOI: 10.2497/jjspm.63.421

Google Scholar

[9] Matula, M.; Hyspecka, L.; Svoboda, M.; Vodarek, V.; Dagbert, C.; Galland, J.; Stonawska, Z.; Tuma, L. Intergranular corrosion of AISI 316L steel. Mater. Charact. 2001, 46, 203–210.

DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(01)00125-5

Google Scholar

[10] Mostafaei, A.; Stevens, E.L.; Hughes, E.T.; Biery, S.D.; Hilla, C.; Chmielus, M. Powder bed binder jet printed alloy 625: Densification, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2016, 108, 126–135.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.067

Google Scholar

[11] Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015). Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, 8(1–4), 465–481.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3

Google Scholar

[12] LENS directed energy deposition (DED) 3D printed metal technology, https://optomec.com/3d-printed-metals/lens-technology/ (accessed 28 January 2021).

Google Scholar

[13] Saboori, Abdollah, et al. "An investigation on the effect of powder recycling on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AISI 316L produced by Directed Energy Deposition." Materials Science and Engineering: A 766 (2019): 138360.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138360

Google Scholar

[14] Ma, Mingming, Zemin Wang, and Xiaoyan Zeng. "A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition." Materials Science and Engineering: A 685 (2017): 265-273.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.112

Google Scholar

[15] Casati, Riccardo, J. Lemke, and Maurizio Vedani. "Microstructure and fracture behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel produced by selective laser melting." Journal of Materials Science & Technology 32.8 (2016): 738-744.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.016

Google Scholar

[16] Kurzynowski, Tomasz, et al. "Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting." Materials Science and Engineering: A 718 (2018): 64-73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.103

Google Scholar

[17] Yadollahi, Aref, et al. "Effects of process time interval and heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructural properties of direct laser deposited 316L stainless steel." Materials Science and Engineering: A 644 (2015): 171-183.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.056

Google Scholar

[18] Campbell, J. (2015). Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Metallurgy, Techniques and Design (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

Google Scholar

[19] Lidman, W. G., and R. V. Rubino. An Investigation of the Slip-casting Mechanism as Applied to Stainless Steel Powder. Vol. 208. Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, 1956..

DOI: 10.2172/4332083

Google Scholar

[20] Singh, Jaspreet, et al. "Investigations for mechanical properties and biocompatibility of SS-316L implant prepared as rapid investment casting for batch production." Sādhanā 43 (2018): 1-10.

DOI: 10.1007/s12046-018-0837-7

Google Scholar

[21] Kao, Yi Chen, et al. "Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) simulation for the robust gating system design: improved process for investment casting defects of 316L stainless steel valve housing." International Journal of Metalcasting (2022): 1-19.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-295542/v1

Google Scholar

[22] Fabricación de piezas de fundición con grafito esferoidal en molde metálico - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Surface-finish-in-castings-produced-using-a-permanent-moulds-and-b-green-sand-moulds_fig1_274777655 [accessed 1 Nov 2024]

DOI: 10.3989/revmetalm.1253

Google Scholar

[23] Effect of Friction on the Micromechanical Properties of AISI 316l Austenitic Steel - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Microstructure-image-of-surface-of-AISI-316L-austenitic-stainless-steel-after-chemical_fig1_352421270 [accessed 1 Nov 2024]

DOI: 10.3390/engproc2025105001

Google Scholar

[24] Kahya, Harun, Hakan Gurun, and Gokhan Kucukturk. "Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Re-Melting Effect in the Manufacturing of 316L by Direct Energy Deposition (DED) Method." Metals 13.6 (2023): 1144.

DOI: 10.3390/met13061144

Google Scholar

[25] DebRoy, Tarasankar, et al. "Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties." Progress in materials science 92 (2018): 112-224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001

Google Scholar

[26] Obeidi, Muhannad Ahmed, et al. "Comparison of the porosity and mechanical performance of 316L stainless steel manufactured on different laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing machines." Journal of Materials Research and Technology 13 (2021): 2361-2374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.027

Google Scholar