Validation of Thermoforming Simulation Models Prior to Parameterization Using Covariance-Based Input-Output Statistics – Assessing the Role of Thermomechanical Material Modeling

Abstract:

Accurate yet computationally efficient simulation models are essential for the virtual design and optimization of thermoforming processes for fiber-reinforced composites. Selecting an appropriate material model remains challenging, particularly when balancing model fidelity against computational cost. In this work, a framework is developed to validate material models used in thermoforming simulations for fiber-reinforced composites. The framework evaluates model performance based on time-series data using covariance-based input-output statistics, without prior calibration. Two numerical studies of increasing complexity demonstrate the versatility of the approach. First, the framework is applied to one-dimensional rheological models, verifying its applicability to mechanical problems relevant to thermoforming simulation. These insights are then applied to complex finite element thermoforming simulations to assess the ability of isothermal material models to predict wrinkling behavior in comparison to a fully coupled thermomechanical reference model. A curvature-based method is introduced to quantitatively evaluate wrinkling severity relative to natural curvatures induced by the tool geometry. The results show that isothermal models are sufficient for short total process times with minor temperature-driven effects, whereas longer total process times with pronounced thermal effects require thermomechanical models to ensure accurate predictions. The findings offer practical guidance for selecting appropriate material models based on specific process conditions, as well as objective criteria for assessing model validity in virtual process design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1182)

Pages:

1-11

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Funder:

The publication of this article was funded by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology 10.13039/100009133

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Philippe Boisse, Remko Akkerman, Pierpaolo Carlone, Luise Kärger, Stepan V. Lomov, and James A. Sherwood. Advances in composite forming through 25 years of ESAFORM. International Journal of Material Forming, 15(3):99, January 2022. ISSN 1960-6214.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-022-01682-8

Google Scholar

[2] Richard M. Vogel and A. Sankarasubramanian. Validation of a watershed model without calibration. Water Resources Research, 39(10), January 2003. ISSN 00431397. doi: 10.1029/ 2002WR001940.

DOI: 10.1029/2002wr001940

Google Scholar

[3] Annie Visser-Quinn, Lindsay Beevers, and Sandhya Patidar. Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(8):3279–3303, August 2019. ISSN 1027-5606.

DOI: 10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019

Google Scholar

[4] Dominik Dörr, Fabian J. Schirmaier, Frank Henning, and Luise Kärger. A viscoelastic approach for modeling bending behavior in finite element forming simulation of continuously fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 94:113–123, January 2017. ISSN 1359835X.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.027

Google Scholar

[5] Dominik Dörr, Tobias Joppich, Daniel Kugele, Frank Henning, and Luise Kärger. A coupled thermomechanical approach for finite element forming simulation of continuously fiberreinforced semi-crystalline thermoplastics. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 125, January 2019. ISSN 1359835X.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105508

Google Scholar

[6] M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 21 (2):239–245, 1979. ISSN 0040-1706.

DOI: 10.2307/1268522

Google Scholar

[7] Siyuan Chen, Adam J. Thompson, Tim J. Dodwell, Stephen R. Hallett, and Jonathan P. H. Belnoue. Fast optimisation of the formability of dry fabric preforms: A Bayesian approach. Materials & Design, 230:111986, June 2023. ISSN 0264-1275.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111986

Google Scholar

[8] Dominik Dörr, Markus Faisst, Tobias Joppich, Christian Poppe, Frank Henning, and Luise Kärger. Modelling Approach for Anisotropic Inter-Ply Slippage in Finite Element Forming Simulation of Thermoplastic UD-Tapes. In AIP Proceedings of the 21th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, January 2018.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5034806

Google Scholar

[9] Dominik Dörr, Daniel Kugele, Tobias Joppich, Frank Henning, and Luise Kärger. On the relevance of thermomechanics and crystallization kinetics for FE thermoforming simulation of semicrystalline thermoplastic tapes. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming: ESAFORM 2019, page 020011, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 2019.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5112516

Google Scholar

[10] Georg Zeeb, Johannes Mitsch, Michael Wilhelm, Luise Kärger, and Frank Henning. Influence of gripper positions on the formation of wrinkles during the thermoforming process of thermoplastic UD-tape laminates. In Materials Research Proceedings, volume 54, pages 544–553. Materials Research Forum LLC, 2025.

DOI: 10.21741/9781644903599-59

Google Scholar

[11] Johannes Mitsch and Luise Kärger. Process simulation data for thermoforming of continuous fiber-reinforced composite materials, Zenodo, December 2025.

Google Scholar

[12] Chen-shi Dong and Guo-zhao Wang. Curvatures estimation on triangular mesh. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 6(S1):128–136, January 2005. ISSN 1673-565X. doi: 10. 1631/jzus.2005.AS0128.

DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.as0128

Google Scholar