Green Sandwich Composite Structures for UAV Wings: Experimental Validation and Numerical Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Growing environmental awareness and the challenges posed by climate change have driven the development of sustainable composites to reduce dependence on fossil resources and mitigate ecological impacts. Conventional composites, despite their high mechanical performance, are constrained by greenhouse gas emissions and limited recyclability, motivating the adoption of “green composites” based on natural fibers, recycled constituents, and bio-based resins. This study presents a sustainable sandwich composite integrating flax fibers, a bio-based epoxy matrix, and a recycled PET foam core. Flexural performance was evaluated through finite element analysis (FEA) in ANSYS Workbench and validated by three-point bending tests. The results show that the 3C specimen achieved a maximum load of 579.92 N, with a deviation of 4.2% from simulation at 6 mm deflection, and all tested specimens exhibited discrepancies below 5%. These findings confirm the suitability of the developed composites for structural applications such as UAV wings, aligning high mechanical performance with environmental sustainability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1194)

Pages:

67-72

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ramachandran K., C.L. Gnanasagaran and A. Vekaraiya: Journal of Manufacturing Processes 89 (2023), pp.124-131.

Google Scholar

[2] Hanie Z., Ponnapat W., Mark L., et al.: Results in Materials 20 (2023), p.100474.

Google Scholar

[3] Issam E., Fethi A., Mohamed H., et al.: Results in Engineering 19 (2023), p.101271

Google Scholar

[4] Pil L., Bensadoun F., Pariset J. and Verpoest I.: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 83 (2016), P. 193-205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.004

Google Scholar

[5] Yan L., Chouw N. and Jayaraman K.: Composites Part B: Engineering 56 (2014), pp.296-317

Google Scholar

[6] Koronis G., Silva A. and Fontul M.: Composite Part B: Engineering 44 (2013), pp.120-127

Google Scholar

[7] Lu Y. and Larock R.C.: Polymer Reviews 46 (2020), pp.1-37

Google Scholar

[8] Faruk O., Bledzki A.K., Fink H.P. and Sain M.: Progress in Polymer Science 37 (2012), pp.1552-1596

DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003

Google Scholar

[9] Naghdinasab M., Farrokhabadi A. and Madadi H.: Finite Element in Analysis and Design 146 (2018), pp.84-95

Google Scholar

[10] Adole M. A., Iorwuese A., Mohammed Y. J. and Abubakar R. S.: Discover Civil Engineering 2 (2025).

Google Scholar

[11] Bernardo Z., Francesco B. and Carmelo M.: Polymers 16 (2024), pp.1-23

Google Scholar

[12] Anas A. T., Mustapha A., Wajdi Z., Rezak A., Brahim M. and Karim B.: Journal of Composites Science 8 (2024). pp.1-21

Google Scholar

[13] Yucheng Z., L. Q. N. Tran, Umeyr K. and Heow P. L.: Journal of Materials Science 52 (2017), pp.4957-4967

Google Scholar

[14] Information on https://sicomin.com/en/

Google Scholar

[15] Information on https://www.lantorcomposites.com/

Google Scholar

[16] Phunpeng V., Sumklang S. and Kerdphol T.: Static and Model Structure Analysis of UAV Composite Materials (International Symposium on Sustainable Aviation 2021).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-37943-7_24

Google Scholar