A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Silane Coupling Agent and Epoxidized Natural Rubber as Compatibilizers in Polybutylene Succinate/Rice Flour Biocomposites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and rice flour (RF) biocomposites containing 10 and 20 parts per hundred resin (phr) of RF were successfully fabricated. The effects of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR-50) at loadings of 0, 1, 5, and 10 phr on the interfacial compatibility and mechanical performance of PBS/20 phr RF composites were examined. The compatibilizing effectiveness of 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane and ENR-50 was also evaluated comparatively. The composites were first blended using a two-roll mill to achieve homogeneous mixing and then molded into test specimens through an injection molding technique. The phase morphology, along with mechanical characteristics such as tensile and flexural properties, impact resistance, and Shore D hardness, was thoroughly evaluated. Incorporating 1 phr ENR-50 resulted in notable improvements in phase compatibility and mechanical properties, with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealing reduced surface roughness and enhanced matrix–filler interfacial adhesion. Improvements in impact strength, hardness and modulus values were also observed at this loading. Further increases in ENR-50 content adversely affected flexural strength, flexural modulus, Young’s modulus, and hardness. Comparative analyses showed that the combined use of a silane coupling agent and ENR-50 yielded a more homogeneous phase morphology with superior mechanical properties compared to the addition of either agent alone. These findings demonstrated the synergistic effect of using both compatibilizer types to enhance the performance of PBS/RF biocomposites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1194)

Pages:

73-81

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.M. Emadian, T.T. Onay and B. Demirel: Waste Manag. Vol. 59, (2017), pp.526-536.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Nath, M. Misra, F. Al-Daoud and A.K. Mohanty: RSC Sustain. Vol. 3 (2025), pp.1267-1302.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Pokhriyal and P.K. Rakesh: Biomass Convers Biorefin. Vol. 14 (2024), p.21245–21260.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Siakeng, M. Jawaid, M. Asim and S. Siengchin: Polymers Vol. 12(2) (2020), p.458;

DOI: 10.3390/polym12020458

Google Scholar

[5] O. Platnieks, S. Gaidukovs, A. Barkane, A. Sereda, G. Gaidukova, L. Grase, V.K. Thakur, I. Filipova, V. Fridrihsone, M. Skute and M. Laka: Polymers Vol. 12(7) (2020), p.1472;

DOI: 10.3390/polym12071472

Google Scholar

[6] C. Rong-or, W. Pongputthipat, Y. Ruksakulpiwat and P. Chumsamrong: Polym Bull. Vol. 81 (2024), p.10729–10746.

DOI: 10.1007/s00289-024-05229-6

Google Scholar

[7] K.L. Pickeringa, M.G. Aruan Efendy and T.M. Le: Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. Vol. 83 (2016), pp.98-112.

Google Scholar

[8] I.P.T. Rajakumar, D. Raguraman, J.S. Isaac, R. Suthan, S. Bhattacharya, A.H. Seikh, S.M.A. Khan, and I.K. Raghavan: Adv Polym Technol. Vol 2022 (2022) Article ID 1458547;

DOI: 10.1155/2022/1458547

Google Scholar

[9] D. Bikiaris and C. Panayiotou: J Appl Polym Sci. Vol. 70 (1998), p.1503–1521.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Khademieslam, M. Kalagar, E.M. Moridani, R. Hosienpoor and A. Tavakkoli: World Appl. Sci. J. Vol. 27(5) (2013), pp.663-666.

Google Scholar

[11] A.M. Salgado-Delgado, E. Lozano-Pineda, R. Salgado-Delgado, J.P. Hernández-Uribe, A. Olarte-Paredes and M.J. Granados-Baeza: Rev. Mex. Ing. Quím. Vol. 21(3) (2022);

DOI: 10.24275/rmiq/Alim2802

Google Scholar

[12] R.L. D'Souza and G. Unnikrishnan: Res. J. Agril. Sci. Vol. 12(6) (2021), p.2281–2284.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Kampeerapappun, N. O-Charoen, P. Dhamvithee and E. Jansri: Polymers Vol. 16(8) (2024), 1038;

DOI: 10.3390/polym16081038

Google Scholar

[14] D. Bikiaris, P. Matzinos, J. Prinos, V. Flaris, A. Larena and C. Panayiotou: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 80 (2001), pp.2877-2888.

DOI: 10.1002/app.1405

Google Scholar

[15] S.T. Sam, H. Ismail and Z. Ahmad: J Vinyl Addit Technol. Vol. 16(4) (2010), pp.238-245.

Google Scholar

[16] K. Liu, W. Stadlbauer, G. Zitzenbacher, C. Paulik and C. Burgstaller: AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 1713(1) (2016), 120008;

DOI: 10.1063/1.4942323

Google Scholar

[17] J. Sun, Y. Pang, Y. Yang, J. Zhao, R. Xia, Y. Li, Y. Liu and H. Guo: Polymers Vol. 11(12) (2019), 1928;

DOI: 10.3390/polym11121928

Google Scholar

[18] S. Phattarateera, P. Threepopnatkul and C. Kulsetthanchalee: Chiang Mai J. Sci. Vol. 40(6) (2013), pp.1035-1045.

Google Scholar

[19] K.K. Wei, T.P. Leng, Y.C. Keat, H. Osman and L.B. Ying: Compos. Part B Eng. Vol. 174 (2019), 107058;

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107058

Google Scholar