Sustainable Materials for Biomass Gasification: Enhancing Syngas Quality through Catalytic and Green Innovation

Article Preview

Abstract:

The global challenges of energy security and climate change highlight the urgent need for renewable energy technologies. Biomass gasification offers a promising thermochemical route for converting organic feedstocks into synthesis gas (syngas), which can serve as a clean fuel or chemical precursor. Despite its potential, large-scale application is constrained by low carbon conversion efficiency, excessive tar formation, unstable syngas composition, and catalyst deactivation. This study applies a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by PRISMA 2020 to examine advances in sustainable catalytic and sorbent materials for improving syngas quality. Literature was retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar (2015–2025), focusing on experimental and simulation-based studies. Results indicate that eco-friendly catalysts such as Ni–Ce/CaO composites, multifunctional Ni/CaO–Ca₁₂Al₁₄O₃₃, lanthanum-promoted Ni–Al₂O₃, red mud, biochar, zeolites, and CaO-based sorbents enhance hydrogen yield, reduce CO₂, and mitigate tar formation. Multifunctional materials combining catalytic and adsorptive properties, particularly in sorption-enhanced gasification, show strong potential but still face challenges of sintering, deactivation, and reactor-dependent variability. Beyond efficiency gains, sustainable catalysts contribute to circular economy principles by valorizing wastes and biomass residues. Future priorities include nanostructured catalyst design, reactor–catalyst integration, techno-economic feasibility, and life cycle assessment to enable industrial-scale deployment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1194)

Pages:

107-114

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mishra S, Upadhyay RK. Review on biomass gasification: Gasifiers, gasifying mediums, and operational parameters. Materials Science for Energy Technologies 2021;4:329–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mset.2021.08.009

Google Scholar

[2] Sher F, Hameed S, Smječanin Omerbegović N, Chupin A, Ul Hai I, Wang B, et al. Cutting-edge biomass gasification technologies for renewable energy generation and achieving net zero emissions. Energy Conversion and Management 2025;323:119213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119213

Google Scholar

[3] Wang L, Zhou T, Hou B, Yang H, Hu N, Zhang M. A Comprehensive Review of Biomass Gasification Characteristics in Fluidized Bed Reactors: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions. Fluids 2025;10.

DOI: 10.3390/fluids10060147

Google Scholar

[4] Gao Y, Wang M, Raheem A, Wang F, Wei J, Xu D, et al. Syngas production from biomass gasification: influences of feedstock properties, reactor type, and reaction parameters. ACS Omega 2023;8:31620–31.

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03050

Google Scholar

[5] Ayuso-Díaz I, Perez-Gil S, Lopez G, Santamaria L, Antoñanzas-González FJ. Progress on waste plastics gasification process: A review of operating conditions, reactors and catalysts for clean syngas production and tar abatement. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025;148:150000.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.190

Google Scholar

[6] Niu Y, Chi Z, Li M, Du J, Han F. Advancements in biomass gasification and catalytic tar-cracking technologies. Materials Reports: Energy 2024;4:100295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matre.2024.100295

Google Scholar

[7] Li J, Wang T, Hao T, Yao X, Xu K, Liu J. Application of biochar catalysts in tar catalytic reforming: A review on preparation, modification, deactivation, and regeneration. Energy 2025;317:134734.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134734

Google Scholar

[8] Aklis N, Rohmat TA, Saptoadi H, Sentanuhady J. Performance and Behaviors of Coconut Shell-Air Dual Fluidized Bed Gasification in the CPFD Simulation with Initial Temperature Variation. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER) 2022;12:398–407.

DOI: 10.20508/ijrer.v12i1.12646.g8416

Google Scholar

[9] Yusuf MI, Aklis N, Candraika F, Sari J, Gibran Z, Ramadhan B, et al. Effect of Biomass Drying Temperature on The Characteristics of Gas Produced by Fluidized Gasifier Bubbling Reactors. vol. 517, EDP Sciences; 2024, p.08003.

DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202451708003

Google Scholar

[10] Song H, Yang G, Xue P, Li Y, Zou J, Wang S, et al. Recent development of biomass gasification for H2 rich gas production. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science 2022;10:100059.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaecs.2022.100059

Google Scholar

[11] Abdelaal A, Antolini D, Piazzi S, Patuzzi F, Villot A, Gerente C, et al. Steam reforming of tar using biomass gasification char in a Pilot-scale gasifier. Fuel 2023;351:128898.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128898

Google Scholar

[12] Binte Mohamed DK, Veksha A, Lim T-T, Lisak G. Hydrogen bromide in syngas: Effects on tar reforming, water gas-shift activities and sintering of Ni-based catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2021;280:119435.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119435

Google Scholar

[13] Qin T, Yuan S. Research progress of catalysts for catalytic steam reforming of high temperature tar:A review. Fuel 2023;331:125790.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125790

Google Scholar

[14] Lysne A, Saxrud I, Madsen KØ, Blekkan EA. Steam Reforming of Tar Impurities from Biomass Gasification with Ni-Co/Mg(Al)O Catalysts—Operating Parameter Effects. Fuels 2024;5:458–75.

DOI: 10.3390/fuels5030025

Google Scholar

[15] Jafarian M, Haseli P, Saxena S, Dally B. Emerging technologies for catalytic gasification of petroleum residue derived fuels for sustainable and cleaner fuel production—An overview. Energy Reports 2023;9:3248–72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.116

Google Scholar

[16] Erawati E, Martenda D. Kinetic study on the pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) waste using kaolin as catalyst. vol. 778, IOP Publishing; 2020, p.012071.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/778/1/012071

Google Scholar

[17] Quan C, Wang M, Gao N, Yang T, Fan X, Miskolczi N. Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass gasification by in-situ CO2 capture with Ni/Ca-based catalysts. Biomass and Bioenergy 2024;182:107110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107110

Google Scholar

[18] Wang J, Kang D, Shen B, Sun H, Wu C. Enhanced hydrogen production from catalytic biomass gasification with in-situ CO2 capture. Environmental Pollution 2020;267:115487.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115487

Google Scholar

[19] Wu J, Zheng Y, Fu J, Guo Y, Yu J, Chu J, et al. Synthetic Ni–CaO–CeO2 dual function materials for integrated CO2 capture and conversion via reverse water–gas shift reaction. Separation and Purification Technology 2023;317:123916.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123916

Google Scholar

[20] Hu Q, Luo C, Mi Y, Jiao J, Wang Y, Hu Z. Multifunctionality of Ni/CaO–Ca12Al14O33 in sorption-enhanced steam gasification of microalgae: adsorption, catalysis, and NOx precursors control. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025;162:150683.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150683

Google Scholar

[21] Yue W, Yu Z, Ma X, Liu H, Li W. Enhanced stability of Ni-CaO catalysts by perovskite-type stabilizer in biomass pyrolysis for hydrogen production. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2023;174:106130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106130

Google Scholar

[22] Sánchez Enríquez A, González Castañeda DG, Calzada Hernández AR, Cruz Reyes I, Serrano Rosales B. Hydrogen production via surrogate biomass gasification using 5% Ni and low loading of lanthanum co-impregnated on fluidizable γ-alumina catalysts 2022;20:17–33.

DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2020-0186

Google Scholar

[23] Yesilova N, Tezer O, Ongen A, Ayol A. Enhancing biomass gasification: A comparative study of catalyst applications in updraft and modifiable-downdraft fixed bed reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024;76:290–303.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.075

Google Scholar

[24] Shang Q, Feng D, Cheng Z, Zhao Y, Sun S. Synergistic catalytic biomass-H2O gasification for H2 production and biochar etching mechanism: Experimental and DFT studies. Fuel Processing Technology 2023;252:107999.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.107999

Google Scholar

[25] Aprianti N, Faizal M, Said M, Nasir S. Sorption-enhanced steam gasification of fine coal waste for fuel producing. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences 2024;36:81–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2022.08.003

Google Scholar

[26] Kim I-T, Ahn K-H, Jung J, Jeong Y, Shin D-C, Lee Y-E. Removal of Tar Contents Derived from Lignocellulosic Biomass Gasification Facilities Using MgAl-LDH@clinoptilolite. Catalysts 2021;11.

DOI: 10.3390/catal11091111

Google Scholar

[27] Nguyen HN, Khuong DA, Tsubota T. Experimental investigation of CO2 adsorption using adsorbents derived from residual char of agricultural waste gasification. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 2024;49:102446.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102446

Google Scholar