Effect of Carbon Equivalent on Thermal Conductivity of Titanium-Alloyed Gray Cast Iron

Article Preview

Abstract:

Gray iron remains the dominant material for automotive brake discs due to its excellent thermal conductivity, wear resistance, castability, and cost-effectiveness. To enhance its performance, this study investigates the effect of varying carbon equivalent (CE) on the thermal conductivity of titanium-alloyed gray iron. Four compositions with CE ranging from 3.89 to 4.77 were cast and analyzed. Microstructural examination revealed a transition from hypoeutectic to hypereutectic structures, with increasing graphite size and reduced dendritic austenite as CE increased. Thermal conductivity measurements, conducted using the Hot Disk Thermal Constant Analyzer, showed that higher CE improved thermal conductivity, attributed to the presence of larger graphite flakes and reduced primary austenite. These results indicate that optimizing CE in Ti-alloyed gray iron can significantly enhance heat dissipation in brake discs, offering improved performance without substantial cost increases.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1196)

Pages:

195-200

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Živić, N. Busarac, S. Milenković and N. Grujovic, Encyclopedia of Materials: Composites (2021), pp.3-19.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Larranaga, J. Sertucha, A. Loizaga, R. Suarez, D.M. Stefanescu, Trans. AFS. 120 (2012) paper 12-035.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Moumeni, D.M. Stefanescu, N.S. Tiedje, P. Larrañaga and J.H. Hattel, Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, 44 (2013) pp.5134-5146.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-1897-2

Google Scholar

[4] E. Moumeni, N.S. Tiedje and J.H. Hattel, Proceedings of the 12th International Foundrymen Conference, Croatia, (2016).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Worakhut, A. Wanalerkngam, R. Tongsri and S. Boonmee, International Journal of Metalcasting (2025).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Boonmee, K. Worakhut, P. Maneelum, Materials Science Forum 987 (2020), pp.177-181.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.987.177

Google Scholar

[7] K. Worakhut, A. Wanalerkngam, W. Boonyarit, K. Amatachaya, N. Wanmai, K. Sriboonrueang, S. Boonmee, Key Engineering Materials 1013 (2025), pp.83-88.

DOI: 10.4028/p-x6ngu3

Google Scholar

[8] A. Razaq, Y. Yin, J. Zhou, X. Shen, X. Ji and I. Ullah, Procedia Manufacturing 37(2019), p.353– 359.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Boonmee, S. Rassamipat, International Journal of Metalcasting 18 (2024), pp.480-493.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Boonmee, N. Mai-Ngam, Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018), pp.9264-9271.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Holmgren, A. Dioszegi, I.L. Svensson, Tsinghua Science and Technology 13(2) (2008), pp.170-176.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Matsushita, A. Gómez Saro, L. Elmquist and A. Järfors, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 30(5) (2017), pp.276-282.

Google Scholar

[13] R.L. Hecht, R.B. Dinwiddie and H. Wang, Journal of Materials Science 34 (1999), p.4775– 4781.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Boonmee, K. Worakhut, Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018), pp.9497-9505.

Google Scholar

[15] G. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Li and Z. Liu, Materials, 11(2018).

Google Scholar