Improvement in Drawability (r Value) of an Aluminum Alloy Subjected to Groove Pressing

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is increasing interest in using Al alloy sheets for auto body applications. However Al alloys exhibit poor drawability as indicated by low values of the normal anisotropy, rm. Techniques for improving the value of rm rely on developing a favourable shear texture in the sheet. In this study, Al alloy AA 6061 sheets of dimensions 225 mm x 200 mm and 1 mm thick were subjected to severe plastic deformation by repeated groove pressing using a set of grooved and flat dies alternatively. The orientation of the grooves with respect to the rolling direction was also varied. Microstructure characterization and mechanical property measurements were carried out. X- ray diffraction scans were carried out to measure the relative intensities of the (111) and (200) peaks. The r values was measured as per ASTM standard E 517 on strip specimens cut at 0°, 45° and 90° to the rolling direction and the normal anisotropy value (rm) and planar anisotropy value (Δr) values were determined. The limiting drawing ratio (LDR) was determined using the Swift cupping test techniques. It was observed that the rm values increased from 0.72 in the as received condition to a maximum of 0.94 and the LDR increased from 1.93 to 2.06 when the groove pressing was carried out with grooves at to 45° the rolling direction. The improvement in rm values can be correlated to the texture developing in the sheet as a result of severe plastic deformation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 638-642)

Pages:

1911-1916

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.F. Hosford and R.M. Caddel: Metal Forming - Mechanics and Metallurgy (Prentice Hall, USA 1993).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Lange: Handbook of Metal Forming (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, USA 1994).

Google Scholar

[3] K. Suzuki: Journal of Mechanical Working Technology Vol. 15 (1987), p.131.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Hill: The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Oxford University Press, UK 1950).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Saito, H. Utsunomiya, H. Suzuki and T. Sakai: Scripta Materialia Vol. 42 (2000), p.1139.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sakai, S. Hamada and Y. Saito: Scripta Materialia Vol. 44 (2001), p.2569.

Google Scholar

[7] J.C. Lee, H.K. Seok, J.H. Han and Y. H Chung: Mater. Research Bulletin Vol. 36 (2001), p.997.

Google Scholar

[8] J.K. Lee and D.N. Lee: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences Vol. 50 (2008), p.869.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Utsunomiya, T. Ueno and T. Sakai: Scripta Materialia Vol. 57 (2007), p.1109.

Google Scholar

[10] J.H. Han, J.Y. Suh, K.K. Jee and J. C Lee: Mater. Sci. and Engg. A Vol. 477 (2007), p.107.

Google Scholar

[11] D.H. Shin, J. J Park, Y. S Kim and K.T. Park: Mater. Sci. and Engg. A Vol. 328 (2002), p.98.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Krishnaiah, U. Chakkingal and P. Venugopal: Scripta Materialia Vol. 52 (2005), p.1229.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Krishnaiah, U. Chakkingal and P. Venugopal: Mater. Sci. and Engg. A Vol. 410-411 (2005), p.337.

Google Scholar

[14] K. Peng, L. Su, L.L. Shaw and K.W. Qian: Scripta Materialia Vol. 56 (2007), p.987.

Google Scholar

[15] S.Y. Chung and H.W. Swift: Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers. Vol. 165 (1952), p.199.

Google Scholar

[16] D.M. Woo: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences Vol. 10 (1968).

Google Scholar