Effect of Silicon Carbide Susceptor and Nickel Catalyst Content on Microwave Enhanced Thermal Conversion of Glycerol Waste

Article Preview

Abstract:

Glycerol waste is by-product from the manufacturing of biodiesel by transesterification method containing impurities such as fatty acid, alcohol, spent catalyst, soap and water. Conversion of this waste to value added fuel products would not only improve economic of biodiesel production but also reduce environmental impact from this process. In this work, thermal conversion of glycerol waste by microwave that induced the heat required for initiating the reaction was carried out in a fixed bed quartz reactor using silicon carbide as the bed medium for microwave receptor as well as supporter for nickel catalyst. For non-catalytic reaction at 220W (700°C), carbon and hydrogen conversions were 22.89% and 19.59%, respectively. Gas production was 0.12 L/min syngas, 0.07 L/min H2, 0.82 MJ/m3 of LHV, and 1.27 H2/CO. In catalytic test, the highest syngas, H2, and LHV of 0.41 L/min, 0.23 L/min, and 9.18 MJ/m3, respectively, were obtained from 1%Ni/SiC while the highest H2/CO of 2.72 was obtained from 0.5%Ni/SiC. The 1%Ni/SiC test also resulted in the highest conversion of carbon and hydrogen as much as 79.50% and 83.26%, respectively. For comparison between fresh and regenerated catalysts, it was found that fresh catalyst performed significantly better that regenerated one in term of higher total conversion which may due to sodium deposition on spent catalyst surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

73-76

Citation:

Online since:

July 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Fernández, A. Arenillas, M.A. Díez, J.J. Pis and J.A. Menéndez: Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis Vol. 84 (2009), p.145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.01.004

Google Scholar

[2] J.A. Menéndez, A. Arenillas, B. Fidalgo, Y. Fernández, L. Zubizarreta, E.G. Calvo and J.M. Bermúdez: Fuel Processing Technology Vol. 91 (2010), p.1.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.021

Google Scholar

[3] J.A. Menéndez, A. Domínguez, M. Inguanzo and J.J. Pis: Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis Vol. 71 (2004), p.657.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Domínguez, J.A. Menéndez, Y. Fernández, J.J. Pis, J.M. Valente Nabais, P.J.M. Carrott and M.M.L. Ribeiro Carrott: Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis Vol. 79 (2007), p.128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.08.003

Google Scholar

[5] Y.F. Huang, W.H. Kuan, S.L. Lo and C.F. Lin: Bioresource Techonology Vol. 99 (2008), p.8252.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Atong, Y. Hawangchu and V. Sricharoenchaikul: Proceedings of Global Congress on Microwave Energy Applications (2008), p.767.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Sutton, B. Kelleher and J.R.H. Ross: Fuel Processing Technology Vol. 73 (2001), p.155.

Google Scholar

[8] W. -Z. Sun, G. -Q. Jin and X. -Y. Guo: Catalysis Communications Vol. 6 (2005), p.135.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Liu, S. Li, S. Zhang, L. Chen, G. Zhou, J. Wang and X. Wang: Catalysis Letters Vol. 120 (2008).

Google Scholar