Comparison of Different Extrusion Methods for Compaction of Powders

Article Preview

Abstract:

Densification of metallic powders by means of extrusion is regarded as a very attractive processing technique that allows obtaining a high level of relative density of the compact. However, the uniformity of the relative density depends on that of strain distribution and on the processing parameters. Several variants of extrusion can be used for compaction of metal particulates, including the conventional extrusion (CE) and equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), often referred to as equal-channel angular extrusion. Each of these processes has certain advantages and drawbacks with respect to compaction. A comparative study of these two extrusion processes influencing the relative density of compacts has been conducted by numerical simulation using commercial finite element software DEFORM2D. The results have been validated by experiments with titanium and magnesium powders and chips.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 667-669)

Pages:

57-62

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.D. Jones, Fundamental Principles of Powder Metallurgy, E. Arnold Publisher, London (1960).

Google Scholar

[2] C.A. Kelto, B.A. Kosmal, D. Eylon, F.H. Froes, Titanium Powder Metallurgy – A Perspective", In Proceeding of Symposium "Powder Metallurgy of Titanium Alloys, (The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1980).

DOI: 10.1007/bf03354494

Google Scholar

[3] M. Hagiwara, S.J. Kim, S. Emura, Blended Elemental P/M Synthesis of Ti-6Al-1. 7Fe-0. 1Si Alloy with Improved High Cycle Fatigue Strength, Scripta Materialia, 39: 9 (1998) 1185 - 1190.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(98)00310-8

Google Scholar

[4] Matthew J. Danachie, Jr., Titanium. A Technical Guide, Second Edition, (ASM International, Ohio 2000), 380.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Zubizarreta, S. Giménez, J.M. Martín, I. Iturriza, Effect of the heat treatment prior to extrusion on the direct hot-extrusion of aluminium powder compacts, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 467: 1-2 (2009) 191-201.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.035

Google Scholar

[6] M. Galanty, P. Kazanowski, P. Kansuwan, W.Z. Misiolek, Consolidation of metal powders during the extrusion process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 125-126 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00327-8

Google Scholar

[7] J. Zasadzinski, J. Richert, W. Libura, Structure and properties of P/M materials formed in a new method without sintering, Advances in Powder Metallurgy, 4 (1992) 353-362.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Kondoch, T. Luangvaranunt, R. Tsuzuki, S. Kamado, Microstructure controlled magnesium alloys via cyclically repeated plastic working, Magnesium Technology (2004), 257-262.

Google Scholar

[9] V. Varyukhin, Y. Beygelzimer, V. Tkatch, V. Maslov, S. Synkov, A. Synkov, V. Nosenko, Consolidation of bulk nanomaterials by twist extrusion of powders, TMS Annual Meeting: Ultrafine Grained Materials IV (2006) 125-130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.081

Google Scholar

[10] A.P. Shpak, V.N. Varyukhin, V.I. Tkatch, V.V. Maslov, Y.Y. Beygelzimer, S.G. Synkov, V.K. Nosenko, S.G. Rassolov, Nanostructured Al86Gd6Ni6Co2 bulk alloy produced by twist extrusion of amorphous melt-spun ribbons, Materials Science and Engineering A, 425: 1-2 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.081

Google Scholar

[11] M. Moss, R. Lapovok, C.J. Bettles, The equal channel angular pressing of magnesium and magnesium alloy powders, JOM, 59: 8 (2007) 54-57.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-007-0105-5

Google Scholar

[12] R. Lapovok, D. Tomus, C.J. Bettles, Shear deformation with imposed hydrostatic pressure for enhanced compaction of powder, Scripta Materialia, 58: 10 (2008) 898-901.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.010

Google Scholar

[13] H.S. Kim, M.H. Seo, C.S. Oh, S.J. Kim, Equal Channel Angular Pressing of Metallic Powders, Materials Science Forum: Advanced Materials Processing II, 437-438 (2003) 89-92.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.437-438.89

Google Scholar

[14] K. Biswas, Comparison of various plasticity models for metal powder compaction processes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 166: 1 (2005) 107-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.006

Google Scholar

[15] S.M. Doraivelu, H.L. Gegel, J.S. Gunasekera, J.C. Malas, J.T. Morgan, J.F. Thomas, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 26 (1984) 527-535.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90006-7

Google Scholar

[16] Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation. DEFORM2D, http: /www. deform. com.

Google Scholar