Effect of Negative Pulse Voltage on the Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Microarc Oxidation Film of A356 Aluminum Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of negative pulse voltage on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation film of A356 aluminum alloy treated by microarc technique was investigated by SEM, coating thickness gauge and electrochemical workstation etc. The results show the negative pulse voltage greatly influences the microstructure and corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation film by its electrode reaction. The film thickness increases while the size of pore and roughness of the film surface decreases initially and then increases with negative pulse voltage increasing. The microarc oxidation treatment considerably improved corrosion resistance, and the highest corrosion potential was -1.16V, which was 0.38V higher than that of substrate, and the corrosion current was lower than that of substrate about three orders of magnitude.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 675-677)

Pages:

1193-1196

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. S. Atroshchenko, O. E. Chufistove, I. A. Kazantsev. Formation of structure and properties of coatings deposited by microarc oxidizing on parts fabricated from aluminum alloys[J]. Metal Science and Heat Treatment Vol. 42(10) (2000), pp.411-415.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02725327

Google Scholar

[2] H.F. Guo, M.Z. An, S. Xu, et al. Microarc oxidation of corrosion resistant ceramic coating on a magnesium alloy [J]. Materials Letters Vol. 60(12) (2006), pp.1538-1541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.066

Google Scholar

[3] T.B. Wei, F.Y. Yan, J. Tian. Characterization and wear and corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation ceramic coatings on aluminum alloy [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds Vol. 389(1-2) (2005), pp.169-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.084

Google Scholar

[4] H.F. Guo, M.Z. An, S. Xu, et al. Microarc oxidation of corrosion resistant ceramic coating on a magnesium alloy[J]. Materials Letters Vol. 60(12) (2006), pp.1538-1541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.066

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Q. Wang, K. Wu, M. Y. Zheng. Effects of reinforcement phases in magnesium matrix composites on microarc discharge behavior and characteristics of microarc oxidation coatings[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 201(1-2) (2006), pp.353-360.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.129

Google Scholar

[6] H.H. Wu , X.Y. Lu , B.H. Long , et al. The effects of cathodic and anodic voltages on the characteristics of porous nanocrystalline titania coatings fabricated by microarc oxidation[J]. Materials Letters Vol. 59(2-3) (2005), pp.370-375.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.10.019

Google Scholar

[7] R.M. Liu, F. Guo, P.F. Li. Effect of voltage on formation of ceramic coating preparedby micro-arc oxidation on aluminum alloy (in chinese) [J]. Transactions of materials and heattreatment Vol. 29(1) (2008), pp.137-140.

Google Scholar

[8] A. L. Yerokhin, V. V. Viktor, L. V. Ashitkov, et al. Phase formation in ceramic coatings during plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminum alloys[J]. Ceramic International Vol. 24(1) (1998), pp.1-6.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-8842(96)00067-3

Google Scholar