Conversion of Surface Energy and Experimental Investigation on the Self-Motion Behaviors of Liquid Droplets on Gradient Surfaces

Article Preview

Abstract:

A surface with surface energy gradient was fabricated by using a controlled photodegradation technique of a fluoroalkylsilane self-assembled monolayer (SAM) using irradiation of vacuum ultraviolet light (wavelength=172 nm). Visualization experiments were carried out to investigate the motion behaviors of water droplets on horizontal gradient surfaces. System free energy conversion was analyzed to understand the mechanics of the droplet self-motion. The results show that the liquid droplets were self-propelled to move from hydrophobic region to hydrophilic region on horizontal gradient surfaces. The motion process of the water droplet experienced an accelerating stage and a decelerating stage. The velocity of 2 mL water droplet reached to a maximum of 23.28 mm/s. In the droplet motion on the horizontal gradient surface, the deformation and spread of the droplet continuously release out the interfacial and gravitational potential energy, which offers the kinetic energy for the droplet motion. However, the released interfacial energy is three orders of magnitude larger than the released gravitational potential energy. Thus, the released interfacial energy is the main source of driven energy for the droplet motion. The theoretical analysis is consistent with the experimental results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

596-601

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Yang, Z. Yang, C. Chen and D. Yao: Langmuir Vol. 24 (2008), p.9889.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Satoh, H. Hosono and H. Suzuki: Anal. Chem Vol. 77, (2005), p.6857.

Google Scholar

[3] M. K. Chaudhury and G. M. Whitesides: Science Vol. 256 (1992), p.1539.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Daniel, M.K. Chaudhury and J.C. Chen: Science Vol. 291 (2001), p.633.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Ichimura, S. -K. Oh and M. Nakagawa: Science Vol. 288 (2000), p.1624.

Google Scholar

[6] G. C. Mo, W. Y. Liu and D. Y. Kwok, Langmuir Vol. 21, (2005), p.5777.

Google Scholar

[7] B. S. Gallardo, V. K. Gupta, F.D. Eagerton, L. I. Jong, V. S. Craig, R. R. Shah and N. L. Abbott: Science Vol. 283 (1999), p.57.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Ouellette: Indus. Phys. Vol. 9 (2003), p.14.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Meyyappan, M. R. Shadnam and A. Amirfazli: Langmuir Vol. 22 (2008), p.2892.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Shastry, M. J. Case and K. F. Bohringer: Langmuir Vol. 22 (2006), p.6161.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Callies, Y. Chen, F. Marty, A. Pepin and D. Quere: Microelectron. Eng. Vol. 78-79 (2005), p.100.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Daniel and M.K. Chaudhury: Langmuir Vol. 18 (2002), p.3404.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Daniel, S. Sircar, J. Gliem and M. K. Chaudhury: Langmuir Vol. 20 (2004), p.4085.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Suda and S. Yamada: Langmuir Vol. 19 (2003), p.529.

Google Scholar

[15] N. Moumen, R. s. Subramanian and J. B. Mclaughlin: Langmuir Vol. 22 (2006), p.2682.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Sugimura, K. Ushiyama, A. Hozumi and O. Takai: Langmuir Vol. 16 (2000), p.885.

Google Scholar