Simulation Study of Hydraulic Fracturing Mechanism with Heterogeneous Material

Abstract:

first of all, this paper intensive studies the hydraulic fracturing mechanism of heterogeneous material resultant from the seepage – damage coupling, based on which, the coupled seepage and damage effects during hydraulic fracturing is investigated, and the difficulties of hydraulic fracturing study are how to determine failure modes and breakdown pressure. By using numerically testing method, the mechanical mechanism of hydraulic fracturing under asymmetric distribution of pore pressure with three holes, including fracture patterns, stress flied distribution, initial fracturing pressure and breakdown pressure, was studied by using the FSD model. According to the results of this research, crack extension direction of hydraulic fracturing is influenced not only by the local pore pressure around crack tip, but also by the gradient distribution of macro pore water pressure. The fracturing direction always propagates towards the regions of higher local pore pressure and breakdown pressure decreases with the increasing of local pore pressure. These results are well aggress with the results in the experiments. This research has important theoretical and engineering value. In engineering practice, we can use the porous asymmetric hydraulic fracturing technology to control the direction of crack propagation. Keywords: hydraulic fracturing; numerical simulation; heterogeneous material; asymmetrical

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 704-705)
• Pages: 993-999
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.704-705.993
• Online since: December 2011
• Authors: Tian Hong Yang, Hong Lei Liu, Qing Lei Yu, Shi Kuo Chen
• Keywords: Asymmetrical, Heterogeneous Material, Hydraulic Fracturing, Numerical Simulation

References

[1] Georgee, Andreev. Brittle failure of rock materials test results and constitutive models. A. A. Balkema / Rotterdam /Brookfield, 1995: 1-5.

[2] T. H. Yang, L.G. Tham, C. A. Tang, Influence of Heterogeneity of Mechanical Properties on Hydraulic Fracturing in Permeable Rocks, Rock Mechanics Rock Engineering， 2004, 37(4), 251-275.

DOI: 10.1007/s00603-003-0022-z

[3] Detournay E , Carbonell R. Fracture mechanics analysis of breakdown process in minifrac or leak-off tests . Proceeding of Eu2 rock'94 . Rotterdam : Balkema , 1994. 399 - 407.

[4] Zhao Z. , Kim H. and Haimson, B. Hydraulic fracturing initiation in granite, Rock Mechanics, Aubertin, Hassani and Mitri (eds), Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, 1996: 1279-1284.

[5] Gorelic M , Chudnovsky A. Application of statistical fracture mechanics in hydraulic fracture [A] . Rock Mechanics . Rotterdam : Balkema , 1996. 1261 - 1268.

[6] Horii. H., Okui. Y. Thermo mechanics and micro mechanics-based continuum theory for localization phenomena. Proc. of IUMAM Symposium on Fracture of Brittle, Disordered Materials, Edited by Baker and Karihaloo, 1993: 391-405.

[7] Yale, D.P. Lyons, S.L. and Qin, G. Coupled geomechanics -fluid flow modeling in petroleum reservoirs: coupled versus uncoupled response. Pacific Rocks 2000, Girard, Liebman, Breeds & Doe (eds), Belkema, Rotterdam , 2000: 137-144.

[8] Jincai Zhang, Mao Bai, J.C. Roegiers, Jianxue Wang, Tianquan Liu, Experimental determination of stress -permeability relationship, Paciffic Rock 2000, Girard, Liebman, Breeds&Doe, Balkema, Rotterdam: 817-822.

[9] Zhan Meili, Cen Jian. Experimentaland analytical study on hydraulic fracturing of cylinder sample, chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2007，26（6），1173-1181.

[10] Bažant Z P, Oh B H. Crack band model for concrete. Materials and Structures (RILEM), 1983, 16: 155~177.

[11] R.G. Jeffrey, K.W. Mills. Hydraulic fracturing applied to inducing longwall coal mine goaf falls. Paciffic Rock 2000, Girard, Liebman, Breeds&Doe, Balkema, Rotterdam: 423-430.

[12] Keivan Noghabai. Discrete versus Smeared versus Element-Embedded Crack Models on Ring Problem. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 4: 307-314.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1999)125:3(307)

[13] Sitharam Thallak, Leo Rothenbury & Maurice Dusseault. Simulation of multiple hydraulic fractures in a discrete element system. Rock mechanics as a multidisciplinary science Roegiers(ed. ), 1991, Balkema Rotterdam, Proceedings of the 32nd U.S. Symposium: 271-280.

[14] Bruni M S, . Dorfmann A, Lao K. Coupled particle and fluid flow modeling of fracture and slurry injection in weakly consolidated granular media, Rock Mechanics in the National Interest, Elsworth, Tinucci, Heasley (eds). 2001, Swets Zeitinger Lisse: 173-180.

[15] Yale, D.P. Lyons, S.L. and Qin, G. Coupled geomechanics-fluid flow modeling in petroleum reservoirs: coupled versus uncoupled response. Pacific Rocks 2000, Girard, Liebman, Breeds & Doe (eds), Belkema, Rotterdam, 2000: 137-144.

[16] Kim, K. and Yao, C.Y. 1994. The influence of constitutive behaviour on the fracture process zone and stress field evolution during hydraulic fracturing. Rock Mechanis, Nelson & Laubach (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam: 193-200.

[17] Bruno M.S. and Nakagawa F.M. Pore pressure influence on tensile fracture propagation in sedimentary rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 1991, 28(4): 261-273.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(91)90593-b