Digital Image-Based Model for Concrete Fracturing Process Analysis

Abstract:

Concrete is a heterogeneous composite material. The heterogeneity consists of the distribution and shape of aggregate, interfacial transition zone (ITZ) and the inhomogeneity of each component materials. The key in numerical models for simulating the fracture behaviors is how to describe the heterogeneity actually. In this paper, at meso-scale level general-purposed digital image processing technologies are utilized to characterize the heterogeneity resulting from the shape and distribution of aggregates and ITZ, and at micro-scale level, a statistical method (e.g. Weibull distribution) is used to describe the heterogeneity of each phase. And then a multi-scale numerical model based on digital image is proposed to simulate fracturing process of concrete under loading condition. The proposed model can take the actual distribution and shape of aggregate into account. The fracturing process of concrete in uniaxial compressive tests is simulated by using the model. The results show that the shape of aggregates plays an important role in stress distributions to influence the damage evolution during loading. The proposed model is capable of capturing the complete failure process of concrete materials that includes the initiation, propagation and coalescence of microcracks as well as cracking pattern associated with different loading stages, which is a new tool to study the fracturing behaviors of concrete in more detail. Key words: digital image; heterogeneity characterization; fracturing process; concrete

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 704-705)
• Pages: 980-988
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.704-705.980
• Online since: December 2011
• Authors: Qing Lei Yu, Tian Hong Yang, Wan Cheng Zhu, Chao Zheng
• Keywords:

  Found Keywords

  Digital Image

  , Concrete, Fracturing Process, Heterogeneity Characterization

References

[1] Chandra S, Berntsson L. Cem Concr Compos 1992; 14: 239 –48.

[2] J.P.B. Leite, V. Slowik, J. Apel. Computers and Structures, 2007, 85 (1): 1293–1303.

[3] Bazant ZP, Tabbara MR, Kazemi MT, Pijaudier-Cabot G. J Eng Mech—ASCE 1990; 116(8): 1686 –705.

[4] B.L. Karihaloo, P.F. Shao, Q.Z. Xiao. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70 (2003) 2385–2406.

[5] Jan G.M. van Mier, Marcel R.A. van Vliet, Tai K. Wang. Mechanics of Materials 34 (2002) 705–724.

[6] J.X. Liu, S.C. Deng, J. Zhang, et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 48 (2007) 269–284.

[7] N. Monteiro Azevedo, J.V. Lemos, J. Rocha de Almeida. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75 (2008) 1569–1586.

[8] WANG Zhuolin, LIN Feng, GU Xianglin. TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 13(2008): 19-25.

[9] Pearce CJ, Thavalingam A, Liao Z, Bicanic N. Eng Fract Mech 2000; 65: 283 –98.

[10] Z.Q. Yue, S. Chen, L.G. Tham. Computers and Geotechnics 30 (2003) 375–397.

[11] P. Wriggers, S.O. Moftah. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 42 (2006) 623-636.

[12] Tang CA. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1997; 34(2): 249 –61.

[13] Tang CA, Liu H, Lee PKK, Tsui Y, Tham LG. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2002; 37: 555 –69.

[14] W.C. Zhu, C.A. Tang. Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 453–463.

[15] YU Q.L., Thesis for the degree of PhD, Northeastern University, Shenyang, PR China, February (2008).