Nanostructured Superhydrophobic Silver Surfaces

Article Preview

Abstract:

Inspired by “lotus-effect”, a superhydrophobic surface, in general, is prepared via two steps: (i) creating a surface roughness and then (ii) lowering the surface energy via a self-assembly of organic molecules or via low surface energy coatings. Superhydrophobicity cannot result if one of these two essential factors does not coexist. In the present work, it has been shown that superhydrophobic properties can be achieved on silver surfaces both via two-steps and a novel and simple one-step process. In the two step-processes a fractal-structured silver film deposited on copper surface by galvanic exchange reactions was passivated using stearic acid organic molecules to reduce the surface energy resulting in the superhydrophobicity. In the one-step process, however, the copper substrates were simply immersed in the silver nitrate solution containing fluoroalkylsilane (FAS-17) molecules resulting in superhydrophobicity. The silver films prepared both via two-steps and one-step processes were found to be highly water repellant with the water drops rolling off those surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were utilized to understand the morphology, molecular bonding, and chemical properties of the superhydrophobic silver surfaces.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 706-709)

Pages:

1630-1635

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Barthlott and C. Neinhuis, Planta 202 (1997) 1.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Gao and L. Jiang, Nature 432 (2004) 36.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Carré and K. L. Mittal (Eds. ) Superhydrophobic surfaces, VSP/BRILL, Leiden (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] D. K. Sarkar and M. Farzaneh, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 23 (2009) 1215.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Saleema and M. Farzaneh Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 (2008) 2690.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Safaee, D. K. Sarkar and M. Farzaneh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 (2008) 2493.

Google Scholar

[7] D. K. Sarkar and M. Farzaneh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 (2008) 3758.

Google Scholar

[8] D. K. Sarkar, M. Farzaneh and R. W. Paynter, Materials Letters 62 (2008) 1226.

Google Scholar

[9] JCPDS, Cu (01-085-1326); Ag (03-065-8428).

Google Scholar

[10] JCPDS: Cu2O (01-077-0199).

Google Scholar

[11] C. Gu, H. Ren, J. Tu, T. Y. Zhang, Langmuir 25 (2009) 12299.

Google Scholar

[12] D. K. Sarkar, X. J. Zhou, A. Tannous and K. T. Leung, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 2879.

Google Scholar

[13] M.L. Miller and R.W. Linton, Anal. Chem. 57 (1985) 2314.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Seyama and M. J. Soma, Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 81 (1985) 485.

Google Scholar

[15] J.A. Gardella, R.L. Chin, S.A. Ferguson and M.M. Farrow, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 8 (1976) 343.

Google Scholar

[16] D. K. Sarkar and R. W. Paynter, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 24 (2010) 1181.

Google Scholar

[17] D. K. Sarkar and N. Saleema, Surf. Coat. Technol. 204 (2010) 2483.

Google Scholar