Modeling the Flow Curve of Hot Deformed Austenite

Article Preview

Abstract:

A 0.02%C plain carbon and a 0.22%C TRIP steel were tested in compression in the temperature range 900°C to 1150°C and strain rate range 0.05s-1 to 1s-1. Thirty-two experimental flow curves were obtained in this way. The critical conditions for the initiation of dynamic recrystallization were determined by the double differentiation method. Using a dislocation density model to describe the austenite flow stress, the work hardening parameters r and h were derived and are used to model the flow curve in the absence of dynamic recrystallization. The latter was employed to calculate the fractional softening attributable to dynamic recrystallization. The kinetics of dynamic recrystallization are then described using Avrami kinetics. Finally, the dependences of the Avrami and work hardening parameters on Z, the Zener-Hollomon parameter, are used to model compression flow curves at strain rates an order of magnitude greater than the ones employed in the tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 715-716)

Pages:

81-88

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Hodgson, J.J. Jonas and C.H.J. Davies in: Handbook of Thermal Process Modeling of Steels, chapter 6, edited by C. Hakan Gür and J. Pan, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Serajzadeh and A. Karimi Taheri, Materials & Design Vol. 23 (2002) p.271.

Google Scholar

[3] A.I. Fernández, P. Uranga, B. Lopez and J.M. Rodriguez-Ibabe, Mater. Sci. & Engin. Vol. A361 (2003) p.367.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Ma, Z. Liu, S. Jiao, X. Yuan and D. Wu, J. Iron & Steel Res. Int. Vol. 15 (2008) p.31.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Wang, J. Chen, Z. Zhao and X. Ruan, J. Iron & Steel Res. Int. Vol. 15 (2008) p.78.

Google Scholar

[6] G.R. Stewart, A.M. Elwazri, S. Yue and J.J. Jonas, Mater. Sci. & Techn. Vol. 22 (2006) p.519.

Google Scholar

[7] M. El Wahabi, L. Gavard, F. Montheillet, J.M. Cabrera, J.M. Prado, Acta Mater. Vol. 53 (2005) p.4605.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.020

Google Scholar

[8] J.J. Jonas, X. Quelennec, L. Jiang and E. Martin, Acta Mater. Vol. 57 (2009) p.2748.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Estrin and H. Mecking, Acta Metall. Vol. 32 (1984) p.57.

Google Scholar

[10] S.B. Davenport, N.J. Silk, C.N. Sparks and C.M. Sellars, Mat. Sci. Tech. Vol. 16 (2000) p.539.

Google Scholar

[11] E.I. Poliak and J.J. Jonas, Acta Mater. Vol. 44 (1996) p.127.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Sakai and J.J. Jonas, Acta Metall. Vol. 32 (1984) p.198.

Google Scholar

[13] I. Seki and K. Nagata, ISIJ Int. Vol. 45 (2006) p.1789.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Ghosh and G.B. Olson, Acta Mater. Vol. 50 (2002) p.2655.

Google Scholar

[15] X. Quelennec, E. Martin, L. Jiang and J.J. Jonas, J. Phys.: Conference Series, in press.

Google Scholar