Structural Mechanism of Reverse α → γ Transformation and New Functional Properties of Fe-Ni Austenitic Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The structure of the metastable austenite Fe–32%Ni alloy quenched for martensite and subjected to the α→γ transformation at slow heating (to 593–773 K) with the formation of a nanocrystalline austenite of different orientation was investigated. Electron diffraction analysis has revealed that nickel-enriched nanocrystalline γ-phase obtain ordered L10 superstructure. Together with the γ-phase, there was detected the disperse ε-martensite with a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) lattice. Along with the realization of ordinary orientation relationships (ORs) of Kurdjumov-Sachs, between a matrix α-phase and an ordered γ-phase in the sample of Fe-32%Ni alloy after slow heating to 773 K there have been established Headley-Brooks Ors. Cyclic transformation promotes the improvement of many functional properties of steels (strength, coercive force, controlling of the thermal expansion coefficient and others).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 738-739)

Pages:

200-205

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V.V. Sagaradze, I.G. Kabanova, Materials Science and Engineering A 273-275 (1999) 457-461.

Google Scholar

[2] V.V. Sagaradze, V.A. Shabashov, V.E. Danilchenko, P. L'Heritier, Materials Science and Engineering A337 (2002) 146-159.

Google Scholar

[3] K.A. Malyshev V.V. Sagaradze, I.P. Sorokin et al. Hardening of austenitic iron-nickel alloys due to phase transformation. М: Science, (1982).

Google Scholar

[4] V.V. Sagaradze, A.I. Uvarov, Strengthening of austenitic steels. М: Science, (1989).

Google Scholar

[5] V.V. Sagaradze, The Structure and Properties of Iron-based Nanocrystalline Alloys Produced Using Cyclic Martensitic Transformations. Severe Plastic Deformations: Toward Bulk Production Nanostructured Materials. Chapter 2. 3. Ed. Altan Burhanettin. 2005. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. pp.153-167.

Google Scholar

[6] I.G. Kabanova, and V.V. Sagaradze, Phys. Met. Met. 58, 3 (1984) 97-105.

Google Scholar

[7] J.F. Albertsen, Physica Scripta. 23 (1981) 301-306.

Google Scholar

[8] K.B. Reuter, D.B. Williams, and J.I. Goldstein, Met. Trans. 20A (1989) 719-725.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Yang, J.I. Golstein Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV (2003) 1156. pdf.

Google Scholar

[10] V.G. Myagkov, O.A. Bayukov, L.E. Bykova, V.S. Zhigalov, and G.N. Bondarenko, JEТP Letters. 80. Is. 7 (2004) 487- 490.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Chamberod, J. Laugier, and J.M. Penisson, J. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 10, 2-3 (1979) 139-144.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(79)90165-3

Google Scholar

[12] V.V. Burdin, V.N. Gridnev, V.N. Minakov, V.I. Trefilov, and A.S. Firstov, Reports of Academy of Sciences. Series physics. 217, 5 (1974) 1045-1048.

Google Scholar

[13] T.J. Headley, J.A. Brooks, Met. Mat. Trans. A. 33 (2002) 5-15.

Google Scholar

[14] E.V. Belozerov, V.V. Sagaradze et. al., Phys. Met. Metallogr. 79, 6 (1995) 606 - 613.

Google Scholar

[15] V.V. Sagaradze, V.E. Danilchenko, P L'Heritier, I.V. Sagaradze, Journal de Physique IV. 112 (2003)41-444.

DOI: 10.1051/jp4:2003920

Google Scholar