Performance of Composite Cements in the Repair of Porcine Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture In Vitro

Article Preview

Abstract:

An ideal injectable bone cement should be able to fill fully the fractures gap and provide good mechanical support. In the present work, the mineralized collagen and calcium sulphate dehydrate (CSD) was incorporated into α-calcium sulphate hemihydrates (α-CSH) to explore an injectable composite cement. The injectability, the setting time and the biomechanics properties were investigated. A porcine thoracolumbar burst fracture model was used to evaluate the biomechanical performance of composite cements. The porcine thoracolumbar burst fracture models in vitro were prepared. A half of models was made by the vertebroplasty of the composite cements, the other half of models was used as control. Imaging analysis showed the composite cements distributed uniformly and solidified well. Biomechanical test showed the ability of the composite cements to repair spinal burst fractures was significant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 745-746)

Pages:

13-20

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hench, L.L., and Polak, J.M. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295, 1014, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Liu HY, Improvement on the performance of bone regeneration of calcium sulfate hemihydrate by adding mineralized collagen, Tissue Eng Part A, Jun 2010; 16(6): 2075-84.

DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0669

Google Scholar

[3] Keya Mao, The Preparation and Evaluation of the Combined Artificial Bone, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 140 (2012) pp.1-6© (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/AMM. 140. 1.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhiguang Huan , Self-setting properties and in vitro bioactivity of calcium sulfate hemihydrate–tricalcium silicate composite bone cements, Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2007, 952-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[5] M. Bohner and G. Baroud, Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials,  13  (2005), p.1553–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.010

Google Scholar

[6] W.S. Pietrzak, Calcium sulfate bone void filler: a review and a look ahead. J Craniofac Surg,  11 4 (2000), p.327–33.

DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200011040-00009

Google Scholar

[7] M. Nilsson, E. Fernandez, S. Sarda, L. Lidgren and J.A. Planell, Characterization of a novel calcium phosphate/sulphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res,  61  (2002), p.600–7.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10268

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang,W., Liao, S.S., and Cui, F.Z. Hierarchical self-assembly of nano-fibrils in mineralized collagen. Chem Mat 15, 3221, (2003).

DOI: 10.1021/cm030080g

Google Scholar

[9] Li XM, Feng QL, Liu XH, Dong W, Cui FH. Collagen-based implants reinforced by chitin fibres in a goat shank bone defect model. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1917–23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.013

Google Scholar

[10] Liao, S.S., Cui, F.Z., Zhang, W., and Feng, Q.L. Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold materials: nano-HA/collagen/PLA composite. J Biomed Mater Res , 2004, Part B 69B, 158.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.20035

Google Scholar

[11] Li XM, Gao H, Uo M, Sato Y, Akasaka T, Feng QL, Cui FZ, Liu XH, Watari F. Effect of carbon nanotubes on cellular functions in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2009; 91: 132–9.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32203

Google Scholar

[12] W.M.M. Heijnen and P. Hartman, Structural morphology of gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O), brushite (CaHPO4·2H2O) and pharmacolite (CaHAsO4·2H2O). J Cryst Growth, 108 (1991), p.290–300.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(91)90376-g

Google Scholar

[13] I. Khairoun, M.G. Boltong, F.C.M. Driessens and J.A. Planell, Some factors controlling the injectability of calcium phosphate bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 9 (1998), p.425–428.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00202-6

Google Scholar

[14] Song HY, Rahman A, Lee BT. Fabrication of calcium phosphatecalcium sulfate injectable bone substitute using chitosan and citric acid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 935–941.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-008-3642-8

Google Scholar

[15] M. Bohner, New hydraulic cements based on α-tricalcium phosphate–calcium sulfate dihydrate mixtures, Biomaterials, Volume 25, Issue 4, February 2004, Pages 741-749.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00573-8

Google Scholar

[16] M. Bohner and G. Baroud, Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials, 13 (2005), p.1553–1563.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.010

Google Scholar

[17] Lu WW, Bioactive bone cement as a principal fixture for spinal burst fracture: an in vitro biomechanical and morphologic study. Spine, 2001 Dec 15; 26(24): 2684-90; discussion 2690-1.

DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00010

Google Scholar

[18] Wilcox RK, A dynamic study of thoracolumbar burst fractures, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov; 85-A(11): 2184-9.

Google Scholar

[19] J.S. Temenoff, A.G. Mikos, Biomaterials 21, 2405 (2000). doi: 10. 1016/S0142-9612(00)00108-3.

Google Scholar

[20] Lazary A, Balla B, Kosa JP, Bacsi K, Nagy Z, Takacs I, Varga PP, Speer G, Lakatos P. Effect of gypsum on proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 393–399.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.002

Google Scholar

[21] B.S. Kim, D.J. Mooney, Trends Biotechnol 16, 224 (1998). doi: 10. 1016/S0167-7799 (98)01191-3.

Google Scholar

[22] W. W. Lu, PhD, Bioactive Bone Cement as a Principal Fixture for Spinal Burst Fracture, SPINE , 2001, Volume 26, Number 24, 2684–2691.

DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00010

Google Scholar

[23] Liu X, Injectable bone cement based on mineralized collagen, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Jul; 94(1): 72-9.

Google Scholar