Non-Destructive Residual Stress Analysis of Induction Hardened Components by Neutron and X-Ray Diffraction

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper the microstructural and residual-stress analysis of an induction hardened plate of medium carbon steel is described. The stress gradient was determined using laboratory X-ray diffraction (IWT, Bremen, Germany) and neutron strain scanning (ILL, Grenoble, France). Due to slight variations of chemical composition in the depth, matchstick like (cross section 2×2mm²) d0-reference samples were prepared from a similarly treated sample. The d0 shift induced by variation of chemical composition was measured by neutron and by X-ray diffraction along the strain free direction (sin²ψ*) and used for the evaluation of the neutron stress calculation. The d0 distribution obtained from the neutron measurement did not appear reliable while the method using X-ray diffraction seems to be an efficient and reliable method to determine d0 profiles in small samples. The evaluation of neutron measurements was then done using the X-ray diffraction d0 distribution. High compressive residual stresses were measured in the hardened layer followed by high tensile residual stresses in the core. A comparison of the neutron measurements with X-ray diffraction (XRD) depth profiles obtained after successive layer removal showed that both methods give similar results. However, these investigations opened the question about the direct comparison of the residual stresses obtained by neutron and XRD. Indeed, a correction of the neutron data regarding the residual stresses in thickness direction might be necessary as these are released in the case of X-ray diffraction measurements after layer removal.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Pages:

420-427

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Grum, J.: Induction Hardening, Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel, ASM International, p.220, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Braisch, P.; Rollmann, J.: Werkstoffkundliche Gesichtspunkte zur Beurteilung des Schwingfestigkeitsverhaltens induktiv randschichtgehärteter Bauteile. Mat. wiss. und Werkstofftech. 31 (2000) 1, 66-80.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4052(200001)31:1<66::aid-mawe66>3.0.co;2-9

Google Scholar

[3] Braisch, P.K.; Kloos, K.H.: Viewpoints and criteria concerning the design of surface induction hardened components. In: Surface Engineering, Ed.: P. Mayr, DGM (1993), 77-82.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90501-0

Google Scholar

[4] Epp, J.; Hirsch, T.; Hunkel, M.; Wimpory, R.: Combined neutron and x-ray diffraction for the characterization of a case hardened disc, Materials Science Forum, 652 (2010), S 37-43.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.652.37

Google Scholar

[5] Pirling, T., Bruno, G., Withers, P.J.: SALSA: Advances in residual stress measurement at ILL, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 524-525 (2006) p.217.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.524-525.217

Google Scholar

[6] Pirling, T., Hughes, D., G., Robinson, J. S.: Precise determination of residual stresses in large specimens by neutron diffraction, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 652 (2010) p.80.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.652.80

Google Scholar

[7] Noyan, I.C., Cohen, J. B.: Residual Stress, Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer, New York, (1987).

Google Scholar

[8] Bourke, M.A.M., Rangaswamy, P., Holdem, T.M. Leachman, R.: Complementary X-Ray and neutron strain measurements of a carburized surface, Materials Science and Engineering, A257 (1998), pp.333-340.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(98)00803-x

Google Scholar

[9] Moore, M. G., Evans, W. P.: SAE Transactions, 1958, Vol. 66, pp.340-345.

Google Scholar