Temperature Induced Internal Stress in Carrara Marble

Article Preview

Abstract:

Stone physical weathering, deterioration and damage (e.g. bowing, cracking, microfracturing) represent a serious problem for preservation of sculptural and architectural heritage objects. Although different mechanisms of such degradation might be responsible (e.g. chemical or biogenic), there is an understanding in the geological community that physical reasons for stone degradation and role of stress are of primary importance. In this work Carrara marble was a chosen for investigation: a calcitic type with ~20% of dolomite. Neutron diffraction was used to investigate the phase composition, the texture, and the strain/stress in calcite and dolomite phases in a bulk marble sample. Evolution of the stress state was studied by measuring strains in calcite and dolomite at two temperatures with clear evidence of thermally induced microstresses. Results are discussed in connection to the theory of composite materials and a micro-mechanical explanation of the general problem of marble deterioration is suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

148-154

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.M. Logan, M. Hastedt, D. Lehnert, M. Denton, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30 (1993) 1531-1537.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(93)90152-4

Google Scholar

[2] A. Koch, S. Siegesmund, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 205 (2002) 299-314.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Siegesmund, K. Ullemeyer, T. Weiss, E.K. Tschegg, Int Journ Earth Sciences, 89 (2000) 170-182.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Zeisig, S. Siegesmund, T. Weiss, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 205 (2002) 65-80.

DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2002.205.01.06

Google Scholar

[5] J. Ruedrich, T. Weiss, S. Siegesmund, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 205 (2002) 255-271.

DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2002.205.01.19

Google Scholar

[6] C. Scheffzük, S. Siegesmund, D.I. Nikolayev, A. Hoffmann, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 271 (2007) 237-249.

DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2007.271.01.23

Google Scholar

[7] C. Scheffzük, S. Siegesmund, A. Koch, Environ. Geol., 46 (2004) 468-476.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Ullemeyer, P. Spalthoff, J. Heinitz, N.N. Isakov, A.N. Nikitin, K. Weber, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 412 (1998) 80-88.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(98)00340-4

Google Scholar

[9] K. Walther, C. Scheffzük, A. Frischbutter, Physica B: Condensed Matter, 276–278 (2000) 130-131.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(99)01378-2

Google Scholar

[10] R.J. Reeder, S.A. Markgraf, Am. Mineral., 71 (1986) 795-804.

Google Scholar

[11] J.D. Bass, Elasticity of minerals, glasses, and melts, in: Mineral Physics & Crystallography: A Handbook of Physical Constants, AGU, Washington, DC, 1995, pp.45-63.

DOI: 10.1029/rf002p0045

Google Scholar

[12] R. Hielscher, H. Schaeben, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 41 (2008) 1024-1037.

Google Scholar

[13] R.A. Winholtz, Separation of Microstresses and Macrostresses, in: M. Hutchings, A. Krawitz (Eds.) Measurement of Residual and Applied Stress Using Neutron Diffraction, Springer Netherlands, 1992, pp.131-145.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2797-4_8

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Hashin, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 29 (1962) 143-150.

Google Scholar