Crystallographic Features of the Relaxor State in the Mixed Ferroelectric System Ba(Ti_1-xZr_x)O₃

Abstract:

The relaxor state has been found in the mixed ferroelectric system Ba (Ti_1-xZr_x)O₃ around x = 0.35. To understand the nature of the relaxor state, the crystallographic features of the paraelectric (PC), ferroelectric, and relaxor states for 0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.40 have been investigated mainly by transmission electron microscopy. It was found that a microstructure of the ferroelectric state for 0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.28 consisted of banded structures with boundaries parallel to the {110}_PC and {100}_PC planes. Based on the Sapriel theory concerning ferroelastic transitions, it was understood that the banded structures were consistent with domain structures in the ferroelectric rhombohedral (FR) state having a polarization vector parallel to one of the <111>_PC directions. With the help of the failure of Friedel’s law in diffraction, furthermore, polar regions having <001>_PC and <110>_PC components of a <111>_PC polarization vector were also found to be separately observed in the PC and relaxor states as well as the FR state. Then, in-situ observation for 0.29 ≤ x ≤ 0.40 made in this study indicated that the PC and relaxor states consisted of polar nanometer-sized regions having these two components. Based on this, the relaxor state in BTZ can be identified as an assembly of polar nanometer-sized regions, which were produced by the suppression of the (PC→FR) ferroelectric transition on cooling.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)
• Pages: 2400-2405
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.783-786.2400
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Hirofumi Tsukasaki*, Yasuhide Inoue, Yasumasa Koyama
• Keywords: Ba(Ti_1-xZr_x)O₃, Domain Structure, Polar Nanometer-Sized Region, Relaxor Ferroelectrics, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

References

[1] G. A. Smolenskii, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 28, 26 (1970).

[2] L. E. Cross, Ferroelectrics 76, 241 (1987).

[3] D. Viehland, S. J. Jang, and L. E. Cross, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2916 (1990).

[4] V. Westphal, W. Kleemann, and M. D. Glinchuk, Phys. Rev. Lett, 68, 847 (1992).

[5] A. K. Tagantsev and A. E. Glazounov, Phys. Rev. B 57, 18 (1998).

[6] B. E. Vugmeister and H. Rabitz, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7581 (1998).

[7] R. Pirc and R. Blinc, Phys. Rev. B 60, 13470 (1999).

[8] A. E. Glazounov and A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2192 (2000).

[9] Z. Yu, C. Ang, R. Guo, and A. S. Bhalla, Mater. Lett. 61, 326 (2006).

[10] P. S. Dobal, A. Dixit, R. S. Katiyar, Z. yu, R. GuO, and A .S. Bhalla, J. Appl. Phys. 12, 89 (2000).

[11] C. Laulhe, F. Hippert, R. Bellissent, A. Simon, and G. J. Cuello, Phys. Rev. B 79, 064104 (2009).

[12] I. -K, Jeong, C. Y. Park, J. S. Ahn, S. Park, and D. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214119 (2010).

[13] H. Tsukasaki, Y. Inoue and Y. Koyama, Ferroelectrics, (2013). (in press).

[14] F. J. Fujimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 14, 1558 (1959).

[15] T. Asada and Y. Koyama, Phys. Rev. B 75, 214111 (2007).

[16] J. Sapriel, Phys. Rev. B 12, 5128 (1975).