Fatigue Behavior of High Manganese TWIP Steels and of Low Alloy Q&P Steels for Car-Body Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

The automotive TWIP steels are high-Mn austenitic steels, with a relevant C content, which exhibit a promising combination of strength and toughness, arising from the ductile austenitic structure, which is strengthened by C, and from the TWIP (TWinning Induced Plasticity) effect. The microstructure of the low-alloy Q&P steels consists of martensite and austenite and is obtained by the Quenching and Partitioning (Q&P) heat treatment, which consists of: austenitizing; quenching to the Tq temperature, comprised between Ms and Mf; soaking at the Tp partitioning temperature (Tp being equal to or slightly higher than Tq) to allow carbon to diffuse from martensite to austenite; and quenching to room temperature. The fatigue behavior of these steels is examined both in the as-fabricated condition and after pre-straining and welding operations, which are representative of the cold forming and assembling operations performed to fabricate the car-bodies. Moreover, the microscopic fracture mechanisms are assessed by means of fractographic examinations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)

Pages:

713-720

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Maggi, G. Scavino, Fatigue characterization of automotive steel sheets, 11th International Conference on Fracture, Torino, Italy, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] N.T. Williams, Resistance spot welding, in: D.L. Olson et al. (eds. ), ASM Handbook, Vol. 6, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 1993, 226 – 229.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Mazumder, Laser-beam welding, in: D.L. Olson et al. (eds. ), ASM Handbook, Vol. 6, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 1993, 262 – 268.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Zhang, Stress intensities at spot welds, International Journal of Fracture 88 (1997) 167 – 185.

Google Scholar

[5] D. Cornette, P. Cugy, A. Hildenbrand, M. Bouzekri, G. Lovato, Ultra high strength FeMn TWIP steels for automotive safety parts, Revue de Metallurgie 102 (2005), 905 – 918.

DOI: 10.1051/metal:2005151

Google Scholar

[6] L. Chen, H.S. Kim, S.K. Kim, B.C. De Cooman, Localized deformation due to Portevin–LeChatelier effect in 18Mn–0. 6C TWIP austenitic steel, ISIJ International 47 (2007), 1804 – 1812.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.47.1804

Google Scholar

[7] P.D. Zavattieri, V. Savic, L.G. Hector, J.R. Fekete, W. Tong, Y. Xuan, Spatio-temporal characteristics of the Portevin–Le Chatelier effect in austenitic steel with twinning induced plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, 25 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.008

Google Scholar

[8] G. Scavino, F. D'Aiuto, P. Matteis, P. Russo Spena, D. Firrao, Plastic localization phenomena in a Mn-alloyed austenitic steel, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 41 (2010), 1493 – 1501.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-010-0191-9

Google Scholar

[9] O. Bouaziz, S. Allain, C. P. Scott, P. Cugy, D. Barbier, High manganese austenitic twinning induced plasticity steels: a review of the microstructure properties relationships, Current opinion in solid state and materials science 15 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.002

Google Scholar

[10] G. Scavino, C. Di Salvo, P. Matteis, R. Sesana, D. Firrao, Portevin–Le Chatelier effects in a high-Mn austenitic steel, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 44 (2013), 787 – 792.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-012-1445-5

Google Scholar

[11] J. Speer, D.K. Matlock, B.C. De Cooman, J.G. Schroth, Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation, Acta materialia 51 (2003), 2611–2622.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00059-4

Google Scholar

[12] D. Edmonds, D. Matlock, J. Speer, The recent development of steels with carbide-free acicular microstructures containing retained austenite, La Metallurgia Italiana 103 (2011), n. 1, 41 – 49.

Google Scholar

[13] G.R. Speich, Dual-phase steels, in: J.R. Davis et al. (eds. ), ASM Handbook, Vol. 1, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 1990, 424 – 429.

Google Scholar

[14] CEN prEN 10338, Cold rolled flat products of multiphase steels for cold forming - technical delivery conditions, CEN, Bruxelles, (2010).

DOI: 10.3403/30280399u

Google Scholar

[15] P. Matteis, G. Scavino, F. D'Aiuto, D. Firrao, Fatigue behavior of dual-phase and TWIP steels for lightweight automotive structures, Steel Research International 83 (2012), 950 – 956.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201100329

Google Scholar

[16] O. Holovenko, M.G. Ienco, E. Pastore, M.R. Pinasco, P. Matteis, G. Scavino, D. Firrao (2013), Microstructural and mechanical characterization of welded joints on innovative high-strength steels, La Metallurgia Italiana 105 (2013), n. 3, 3-12.

Google Scholar

[17] W.J. Dixon, A.M. Mood, A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 43 (1948), 109-126.

DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254

Google Scholar

[18] UNI 3964: 1985 Italian National Standard, Mechanical testing of metallic materials - Fatigue testing at room temperature - General principles (in Italian).

Google Scholar

[19] W.D. Pilkey, D.F. Pilkey, Peterson's stress concentration factors, Wiley (2008).

Google Scholar

[20] D. Firrao, S. Anzalone, J.A. Begley, The influence of carbide morphology on the upper-shelf fracture toughness (JIc) of carbon steels, Metallurgical Science and Technology 2 (1984), 15-23.

Google Scholar