Effect of Thermomechanical Processing on Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Conductor Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of different thermomechanical processes (hot extrusion and Properzi continuous rolling) on the electrical and mechanical properties of the Al-Fe aluminum conductor alloys was investigated. The microstructural evolution of the supply rods was characterized by an optical microscope, a transmission electron microscope and the electron backscatter diffraction technique (EBSD). Tensile tests and electrical conductivity measurements were carried out at room temperature on the supply rods. Results showed that, at the same Fe content, the continuously rolled rods demonstrated higher tensile strength but lower elongation and electrical conductivity compared with those of the extruded rods. A partially recrystallized structure along with a big subgrain size appeared in the extruded rods while only a dynamic recovery with a small subgrain size was found in the continuously rolled rods. The precipitation of iron-rich dispersoids was observed in the extruded rods and is associated with a depletion of the iron concentration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 794-796)

Pages:

1121-1126

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.J. Herbert, Aluminum as a conductor material for communication cables. Wire Journal, 2 (1969) 53-57.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Fox, G.J. Herbert, Aluminum-Alloy Conductor for Communication Cable with Superior Creep and Stress-Relaxation Properties. IEEE Transactions on Parts Hybrids and Packaging, 9(1) (1973) 22-30.

DOI: 10.1109/tphp.1973.1136709

Google Scholar

[3] V.M. Sizyakov, V.Y. Bazhin, A.A. Vlasov, Status and Prospects for Growth of the Aluminum Industry. Metallurgist, 54 (2010) 409-414.

DOI: 10.1007/s11015-010-9316-z

Google Scholar

[4] US3711339, Aluminum alloy conductor, Olin Corp, Jan. (1973).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Kalish, B.G. Lefevre, S.K. Varma, Effect of Alloying and Processing on Subgrain-Strength Relationship in Aluminum Conductor Alloys. Metallurgical Transactions A, 8 (1977) 204-206.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02677284

Google Scholar

[6] E.H. Chia, E.A. Starke, Application of Subgrain Control to Aluminum Wire Products. Metallurgical Transactions A, 8 (1977) 825-832.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02661563

Google Scholar

[7] D. Kalish, B. G. Lefevre, Subgrain strengthening of aluminum conductor wires. Metellurgical Transaction A, 6 (1975) 1319-1324.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02641923

Google Scholar

[8] D. Kalish, Nonferrous wire handbook. pp.155-176, (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] H.J. McQueen, in 15th International Conference on the Strength of Materials , p.240, (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] C.J. Shi, W.M. Mao, X.G. Chen, Evolution of activation energy during hot deformation of AA7150 aluminum alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A, 571 (2013) 83-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.080

Google Scholar

[11] F.J. Humphreys, Review-Grain and subgrain characterisation by electron backscatter diffraction. Journal of Materials Science, 36 (2001) 3833-3854.

Google Scholar

[12] O.D. Sherby, O.A. Ruano, Rate-controlling processes in creep of subgrain containing aluminum materials, Materials Science and Engineering A, 410-411 (2005) 8-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.077

Google Scholar