Influence of the Dry Turning Parameters on the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of UNS A92024 Samples

Álvaro Gómez-Parra; Francisco Javier Puerta-Morales; Edwing Isaac Rosales; Daniel García-Jurado; José Manuel Mainé; Mariano Marcos Bárcena

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.797.65

Paper Titles

Contribution of Surface Finish Monitoring Signals in CNC Taper Turning
p.41

Cutting Forces Prediction in the Dry Slotting of Aluminium Stacks
p.47

Evaluation of Cutting Tools Secondary Adhesion Wear Using 3D Optical Topography Techniques — Application to Dry Turning of Al-Cu Aerospace Alloy
p.53

Experimental Prediction Model for Roughness in the Turning of UNS A97075 Alloys
p.59

Influence of the Dry Turning Parameters on the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of UNS A92024 Samples
p.65

Real Time Diagnosis Charts of Thread Quality in Tapping Operations
p.71

Relationship of Pocket Geometry and Tool Path Strategy with 2 1/2-D Milling Parameters: Machining Time, Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness
p.78

Topography Prediction on Grinding of Emerging Aeronautical TiAl Intermetallic Alloys
p.84

An Upper Bound Approach of Ring Compression Test Solutions
p.93

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 797Influence of the Dry Turning Parameters on the...

Influence of the Dry Turning Parameters on the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of UNS A92024 Samples

Abstract:

The influence of the forming process in the response into service of the manufactured workpieces, in the first instance, through the surface integrity can be evaluated. The concept of surface integrity includes the assessment of geometrical aspects like shape and dimensions, and physicochemical properties like hardness and corrosion resistance. This work reports on the results of a study of the influence of the turning parameters on the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of turned bars of UNS A92024 Aluminium-Copper alloy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Materials Processing Technologies

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 797)

Pages:

65-70

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.797.65

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Álvaro Gómez-Parra*, Francisco Javier Puerta-Morales, Edwing Isaac Rosales, Daniel García-Jurado, José Manuel Mainé, Mariano Marcos Bárcena

Keywords:

Al-Cu Alloys, Dry Turning, Feed Rate, Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] E.M. Rubio, A.M. Camacho, J.M. Sanchez-Sola b, M. Marcos, Surface roughness of AA7050 alloy turned bars. Analysis of the influence of the length of machining, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 162–163 (2005) 682–689.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.096

Google Scholar

[2] V. S. Sharma, M. Dogra, N. M. Suri, Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 49 (2009) 435–453.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010

Google Scholar

[3] M. Suraratchai, J. Limido, C. Mabru , R. Chieragatti, Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy, International Journal of Fatigue. 30 (2008) 2119–2126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.003

Google Scholar

[4] A. Gómez-Parra, M. Álvarez-Alcón, J. Salguero, M. Batista, M. Marcos, Analysis of the evolution of the Built-Up Edge and Built-Up Layer formation mechanisms in the dry turning of aeronautical aluminium alloys. Wear. 302 (2013) 1209-1218.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.001

Google Scholar

[5] ISO 6892-1. Metallic materials -Tensile testing- Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. 1st Edition, (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] ISO 1143. Metallic materials -Rotating bar bending fatigue testing. 1st Edition, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] M.S. Carrilero, R. Bienvenido, J.M. Sánchez, M. Álvarez, A. González, M. Marcos, A SEM and EDS insight into the BUL and BUE differences in the turning processes of AA2024 Al–Cu alloy. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 (2002) 215-220.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00112-2

Google Scholar

[8] E.M. Trent, P.K. Wright, Metal Cutting, Third Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA, (1991).

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. El-Axir, A method of modeling residual stress distribution in turning for different materials, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 (2002) 1055-1063.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00031-7

Google Scholar

[10] I.S. Jawahir, E. Brinksmeier, R. M'Saoubi, D.K. Aspinwall, J.C. Outeiro, D. Meyer, D. Umbrello, A.D. Jayal, Surface integrity in material removal processes: Recent advances. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 60 (2011) 603-626.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002

Google Scholar

[11] A. Javidi, U. Rieger, W. Eichlseder, The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life, Int. J. Fatigue. 30 (2008) 2050-(2055).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.005

Google Scholar

[12] B. Griffiths, Manufacturing Surface Technology: Surface Integrity and Functional Performance, first ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, UK, (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] S. Jeelani, M. Musial, Effect of cutting speed and tool rake angle on the fatigue life of 2024-T351 aluminium alloy, Int. J. Fatigue. 6 (1984) 169-172.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(84)90034-3

Google Scholar