Fundamentals of Geopolymers and Related Alkali Activated Materials

Abstract:

With the increasing rate of depletion of natural raw materials for production of building materials, their sustainable usage is clearly an important topic for consideration. For instance, 1 tonne ordinary Portland cement (OPC) requires 1.7 tonnes of raw materials, 1.0 tonne of coal and 100 kWh of electricity. One tonne of cement emits 0.8 - 1 tonne of CO₂ into atmosphere globally contributing ~5% of total manmade carbon dioxide. Therefore, the development of new, sustainable, low carbon footprint construction materials is an important task for materials scientists and civil engineers. One type of binder that is attracting particular attention around the world is alkali-aluminosilicate chemistry based material the so-called geopolymers. In this presentation we will discuss the fundamentals of geopolymer chemistry and the similarities to and differences from conventional alkali activated materials chemistry. Particular attention will be given to our latest results on the preparation of geopolymer type paste and concrete from fly ash. Mechanical activation of fly ash caused a decrease in porosity with a partial amorphisation of the crystalline constituents. Geopolymer type paste prepared from 30 minute milled Darkhan pond ash showed increase in 7 day compressive strengths by 7 times reaching of 15.4 (4.6) MPa. Keywords: Geopolymer binder, alkali-activated materials, coal combustion by products

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 803)
• Pages: 144-147
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.144
• Online since: August 2014
• Authors: J. Temuujin*, A. Minjigmaa, U. Bayarzul, Ts. Zolzaya, B. Davaabal, J. Amgalan
• Keywords: Alkali Activated Material, Coal Combustion by Products, Geopolymer Binder

References

[1] de Quervain B. Resource Efficiency in Cement Production, Presented in Smart Energy Strategies Conference 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, 22 September 2011, http: /www. esc. ethz. ch/ses11/DeQuervain_presentation. pdf.

[2] E. Gartner, Industrially interesting approaches to 'low-CO2', cements, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (2004) 1489–1498.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021

[3] Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D. Geopolymerisation: a review and prospects for the minerals industry. Minerals Engineering, 20, (2007) 1261–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.07.011

[4] Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, Van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42 (2007) 2917–33.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

[5] Pacheco-Torgal F, Abdollahnejad Z, Camões AF, Jamshidi M, Ding Y, Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?, Construction and Building Materials, 30 (2012) 400–05.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017

[6] J. Davidovits and Sawyer, US Patent 4, 509, 985.

[7] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials, Journal of thermal analysis, 37 (1991) 1633-1656.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01912193

[8] V. Glukhovskii, Soil silicates, Gosstroiizdat, (1959).