The Relationship between Water Absorption and Porosity for Geopolymer Paste

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental study of the relationship between water absorption and porosity for geopolymer paste. In order to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to the environment, alternatively fly ash was used as binders in making concrete paste. Fly ash is a waste materials produced by combustion of coal at power plant. Geopolymer paste prepared from class F fly ash was obtained from coal power plant and mixed with an alkaline activator. The combination of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution were used as alkaline activator. The alkaline activator was prepared 24 hrs prior to use with the ratio of the mixture of Na2SiO3/NaOH is 2.5. Mixed fly ash and alkaline activator placed in moulds and compacted. The samples were kept at ambient temperature in the moulds until it hardened. All the samples were removed from the moulds after 24 hrs. Then, the samples were cured at 60 °C in the oven for 24 hrs. All twelve samples were prepared for water absorption and porosity measurement. The samples were examined after 7, 14, 28 and 90 days in terms of water absorption test and porosity test. It was observed that after day 90 the sample had the lowest water absorption of 3.81% and porosity 3.77%. The sample had the highest water absorption and porosity of 4.65% and 11.95% respectively at day 7. The pore size decreases and the structures became denser. The morphological structure of geopolymer paste pores can be observed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The porosity and permeability also decreased hence the durability potentially improved. Keywords: Water absorption, porosity, geopolymer, fly ash

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

166-172

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Neville AM. Properties of Concrete. 4th ed. Essex, England: Pearson Educational Limited; 2002. [ISBN: 978-0-582-23070-5].

Google Scholar

[2] T.Y. Lo, H. Z. Cui, A. Nadeem, and Z. G. Li. The Effects of Air Content on Permeability of Lightweight Concrete. Cem Concr Res, 36 (2006), pp.1874-1878.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.06.009

Google Scholar

[3] Jayeshkumar Pitroda and Dr F S Umrigar. Evaluation of Sorptivity and Water Absorption of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Thermal Industry Waste (Fly Ash). International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), Volume 2, Issue 7, January (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] Rafat Siddique. Compressive Strength, Water Absorption, Sorptivity, Abrasion Resistance and Permeability of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Coal Bottom Ash. Journal Construction and Building Materials, ELSEVIER, Volume 47 (2013) 1444-1450.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.081

Google Scholar

[5] Suresh Tokchom, Partha Ghosh and Somnath Ghosh. Effect of Water Absorption, Porosity, and Sorptivity on Durability of Geopolymer Mortars. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Volume 4 (2009) pp.28-32, ISSN 1819-6608.

Google Scholar

[6] Karthik H. Obla. What is Green Concrete?: Point of View. The Indian Concrete Journal. 2009, pp.26-28.

Google Scholar

[7] M. I. Abdul Aleem and P. D. Arumairaj. Geopolymer Concrete – A Review. International Journal Engineering Sciences & Emerging Technologies. Volume 1 (2012), Issue 2, pp.118-122.

Google Scholar

[8] J. G. S. Van Jaarsveld, J.S. J. Van Deventer and G. C. Lukey. The Characterisation of Source Materials in Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers. Materials Letters, Volume 57 (2003) No. 7, pp.1272-1280.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(02)00971-0

Google Scholar

[9] Bakharev T, Sanjayan J. G, and Chen B. Resistance of Alkali Activated Slag Concrete to Acid Attack. Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (2003) pp.1607-1611.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00125-x

Google Scholar

[10] J.T. Gourley and G. B. Johnson, Developments in Geopolymer Precast Concrete article, J. World Congress Geopolymer (2005) 139-143.

Google Scholar

[11] Designation C618-12a, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use in concrete, ASTM International, (2012).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-15

Google Scholar

[12] Boral Fly Ash, 2002. Boral Material Technologies. San Antonio, Texas.

Google Scholar

[13] B. V. Rangan. Low-Calcium Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. 2008. Pp. 1-19.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420007657.ch26

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C642-06, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, United States, (2006).

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM D7063/D7063M-11, Standard Test Method for Effective Porosity and Effective Air Voids of Compacted Bituminous Paving Mixture Samples, ASTM International, United States, (2011).

DOI: 10.1520/d7063_d7063m

Google Scholar