The Photocatalytic Degradation of Methomyl over TiO2 Nanopowder Prepared by the Low Temperature Solvothermal Route

Article Preview

Abstract:

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanopowder was prepared by the low temperature solvothermal route with starting chemicals containing titanium isopropoxide, ammonium hydroxide, nitric acid and ethanol in a PTFE–lined autoclave. The final pH of the mixed solution was 1 and treated at 100 °C for 2–6 h. The white precipitated was filtered and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The phase transition was characterized by X–ray diffractometer (XRD). Single phase anatase structure was obtained without calcination step. The morphology and particle size of TiO2 nanopowder was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The average of TiO2 nanopowder size was 80–120 nm. The average particle size increased with temperature and time increased. The photocatalytic degradation of methomyl in natural water was studied by high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC). The percentage of methomyl was decreased in the presence of 34, 23 and 24 over TiO2 nanopowder prepared by the low temperature solvothermal route at 100 °C for 2, 4 and 6 h, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

209-212

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Tamimi, S. Qourzal, N. Barka, A. Assabbane and Y. Ait–Ichou: Sep. Purif. Technol. Vol. 61 (2008), p.103.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Tomašević, J. Đaja, S. Petrović, E.E. Kiss and D. Mijin: Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Quart. Vol. 15 (2009), p.17.

Google Scholar

[3] Md.W. Aktar, S. Alam, D. Sengupta and A. Chowdhury: Orbital: Electron. J. Chem. Vol. 2 (2010), p.225.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Zhou, J. Deng, Y. Zhao, W. Liu, L. An and F. Chen: Mater. Chem. Phys. Vol. 117 (2009), p.522.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Xie, L. Jing, J. Zhou, J. Lin and H. Fu: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 176 (2010), p.139.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Šegota, L. Ćurković, D. Ljubas, V. Svetličić, I.F. Houra and N. Tomašić: Ceram. Int. Vol. 37 (2011), p.1153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.10.034

Google Scholar

[7] P. Pookmanee and S. Phanichphant: J. Ceram. Process. Res. Vol. 10 (2009), p.167.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Li, X. Qin, G. Wang, L. Qi, G. Du and Z. Hu: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 257 (2011), p.8006.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Jing, L. Li, Q. Zhang, P. Lu, P. Liu and X. Lü: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 189 (2011), p.40.

Google Scholar

[10] C. –S. Kim, B.K. Moon, J. –H. Park, S.T. Chung and S. –M. Son: J. Cryst. Growth Vol. 254 (2003), p.405.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Yáñez–Vilar, M. Sánchez–Andújar, C. Gómez–Aguirre, J. Mira, M.A. Señarís–Rodríguez and S. Castro–García: J. Solid State Chem. Vol. 182 (2009), p.2685.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2009.07.028

Google Scholar

[12] J. –S. Lee and S. –C. Choi: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 25 (2005), p.3307.

Google Scholar

[13] Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS). Powder Diffraction File, Card No. 21–1272, Swarthmore, PA.

Google Scholar

[14] T. Hirakawa, K. Yawata and Y. Nosaka: Appl. Catal. A–Gen. Vol. 325 (2007), p.105.

Google Scholar