Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of TA29 Titanium Alloy at Different Temperatures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The low cycle fatigue behaviour of TA29 titanium alloy blisk forging at 300°C, 400°C, 500°C, 600°C were studied. The cyclic stress response, the stress-strain behaviour, the fatigue life and the fractograph were observed and analyzed. Through the double logarithm linear regression, the Coffin-Manson model parameters of TA29 titanium alloy at different temperatures were obtained. The results showed that the fatigue life decreases as the strain amplitude increases. Also, the testing temperature has a significant effect on the low cycle fatigue properties of TA29 titanium alloy. At the same level of the strain amplitude, the fatigue life and the peak value of cyclic stress decrease, while the plastic strain component in total strain amplitude increases with the increase of testing temperature. On the basis of the fractograph of fatigue specimens, the initiation of crack is mainly on the surface of the specimen. Fatigue striations can be seen clearly at fatigue crack propagation area. The fatigue striations in stable fatigue crack propagation area were broadened, and the propagation area was reduced and the final rupture area was increased with the increase of testing temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

353-359

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. R. Winstone, A. Partridge, J. W. Brooks. The contribution of advanced high temperature materials to future aeroengine[C], Proc. Inst. Mech. Engs. 2001, 25(1): 63-73.

Google Scholar

[2] M. A. Hicks, M. C. Thomas. Advances in aeroengine materials: Proceedings of the 6th International Charles Parsons Turbine Conference[C]. Ireland: Trinity College Dublin, 2003: 43-56.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Li, J. M. Cai, R. Duan, X. Huang. High Cycle Fatigue of TG6 Alloy [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23(S1): 277-281.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Barussaud, Y. Desvallees, J. Y. Guedou. In: Titanium'95 Science and Technology, 1996: 1599.

Google Scholar

[5] J. M. Cai, H. Zhang, X. Huang, C. X. Cao, High temperature low cycle fatigue behavior and its micro-mechanism of titanium alloy at 600 ℃[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2010, 20(S1): 342-347.

Google Scholar

[6] X. Wang, M. Jahazi, S. Yue. Substructure of high temperature compressed titanium alloy IMI 834 [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2006, 434: 188−193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.119

Google Scholar

[7] L. J. Huang, X. Huang. Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Ti-1023 Titanium Alloy at Room Temperature [J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2006, 35(5): 703-706.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Z. Ma, H. L. Huang, Y. J. Hu. The Low Cycle Fatigue Properties of Ti-31 Alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 1997, 26(1): 27-30.

Google Scholar

[9] H. M. Fu. A Formula of Three-Parameter Power Function for e-N Curves[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1993, 14(3): 173-176.

Google Scholar

[10] Standard E606. In; Annual BCook of ASTM Stanard[S]. Philadelphia: ASTM, (1996).

Google Scholar

[11] H. C. Yu, S. C. Zhang, Y. Li. Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviors of Structural Steel 16Cr3NiWMoVNbE at Different Temperatures[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(2): 44-47.

Google Scholar