Contrastive Study on Finite Element Models of High-Strength Pipelines Crossing Active Faults

Abstract:

There is a potential for major damage to the pipelines crossing faults, therefore the strain-based design method is essential for the design of buried pipelines. Finite element models based on soil springs which are able to accurately predict pipelines’ responses to such faulting are recommended by some international guidelines. In this paper, a comparative analysis was carried out among four widely used models (beam element model; shell element model with fixed boundary; shell element model with beam coupled; shell element model with equivalent boundary) in two aspects: differences of results and the efficiency of calculation. The results show that the maximum and minimum strains of models coincided with each other under allowable strain and the calculation efficiency of beam element model was the highest. Besides, the shell element model with beam coupled or equivalent boundary provided the reasonable results and the calculation efficiency of them were higher than the one with fixed boundary. In addition, shell element model with beam coupled had a broader applicability.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 850)
• Pages: 957-964
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.850.957
• Online since: March 2016
• Authors: Wei Zheng*, Hong Zhang, Xiao Ben Liu, Le Cai Liang, Yin Shan Han
• Keywords: Comparative Study, Fault, Finite Element Models, Soil Springs

References

[1] CSA-Z662, Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, (2007).

[2] ALA-ASCE, Guideline for the design of buried steel pipeline, (2001).

[3] China National Petroleum Corporation GB-50470, Seismic technical code for oil and gas transmission pipeline engineering, (2008).

[4] Zhang H., Cui H. S., The applicability of strain-based pipeline strength design method, Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation. 31 (2012) 952-954.

[5] Tohidi R. Z., Shakib H., Response of steel buried pipeline to the three-dimensional fault movements, J. Sci. Technol. 14 (2003) 1127-1135.

[6] Joshi S., Prashant A., Deb A., Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31 (2011) 930-940.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003

[7] Liu X. J., Sun S. P., Strain based design of buried pipelines crossing faults, Special Struct. 22 (2005) 81-85.

[8] Liu X. B., Chen Y. F., Zhang H., Prediction on the design strain of X80 steel pipelines across active faults under stress, Natur. Gas Ind. 34 (2014) 123-130.

[9] Liu X. B., Zhang H., Chen Y. F., Strain prediction of x80 steel pipeline at strike-slip fault under compression combined with bending, In: Proceedings of the 2015 ASME Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, Boston, (2015).

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2015-45173

[10] Takada S., Hassani N., Fukuda K., A new proposal for simplified design of buried steel pipes crossing active faults, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (2001) 1243-1257.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.62

[11] Liu M., Wang Y. Y., Yu Z. F., Response of pipelines under fault crossing, In: Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, 2008, pp.162-165.

[12] Liu A.W., Earthquake response analysis of buried pipeline based on shell model, Beijing Institute of Geophysics, CAE, (2002).

[13] Yan X.Z., Zhang L.S., Yang X.J., Strain response study of oil gas pipeline crossing earthquake fault based on pipeline-soil coupling and large deformation shell model, China Civ. Eng. J. 8 (2010) 132-139.

[14] Vazouras P., Karamanos S. A., Dakoulas P., Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30 (2010) 1361-1376.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011

[15] Bolvardi V., Bakhshi A., A study on seismic behavior of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/41138(386)1

[16] Trifonov O. V., Cherniy V. P., A semi-analytical approach to a nonlinear stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30 (2010) 1298-1308.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.002

[17] Xie X., Symans M. D., O'Rourke M. J., Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to strike-slip faulting, J. Earthq. Eng. 15(2011) 1273-1296.

DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2011.569052

[18] ABAQUS Inc, Abaqus analysis user's manual Volume IV: Element, ABAQUS Inc., Rhode Island, (2004).

[19] Petrochina Company Limited Q/SY GJX 0136-2008, Guideline for strain-based design in seismic area and active fault crossing of the second west-east natural gas transportation pipeline project, (2008).